Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar  (Read 111780 times)

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #252 on: June 27, 2022, 07:29:20 PM »
Yes, and correct me if I'm wrong, but the funniest thing of all is there's no record of Lee ever having bought the ammunition for this gun. You can't shoot the alleged murder weapon without the bullets. And wasn't there a dent in one of the shell's lip found in the building? I mean, you'd think there was a defect with the gun and it would have made all three with a dent upon ejection, right?

There is a record of his purchase of the rifle, but you apparently don't accept that.  What difference would a record of his purchase of the ammunition make to you?  Maybe there was such a record somewhere, but it was never found because Oswald used a different alias or it wasn't kept for months by whoever sold it to him.  Do you even know if they kept any records of ammunition purchases in 1963?  Are you really suggesting that the absence of such evidence somehow casts doubt on the mountain of evidence that links Oswald to the crime? 

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #253 on: June 27, 2022, 09:53:33 PM »
A picture of Oswald holding the rifle outside his own apartment is pretty good evidence of his ownership of the rifle.  Particularly given the circumstances.  The rifle in the picture was one that he kept in his apartment in Neely St.  The picture was taken just outside that apartment.  He was not on safari or at some place where it might be possible that he was using someone else's rifle but at his residence.  Whose rifle do you think he might be holding outside his own apartment?  No one else was even present except Marina.  There is zippo evidence that anyone else gave him a rifle to hold in that picture.  How would a "signed receipt" - whatever that is supposed to mean in the context of a mail order rifle - change your view since you believe the Klein's documentation is forged etc?  Oswald had ID in the Hidell name.  How do you know that he didn't present that?  He would have had the card from his PO Box informing him of the package.  Most likely presenting that to the clerk would suffice.  Only someone with access to his PO Box could obtain the package notification card.  This was 1963.

A picture of Oswald holding the rifle outside his own apartment is pretty good evidence of his ownership of the rifle.

Yes, a simple mind would accept that idea but a more inquisitive mind would ask:.... That seems to be a photo of Lee Oswald holding a carcano,....BUT ...is it the same carcano that was found in the TSBD after the assassination?   And simply because Lee Oswald has possession at the moment the photo was taken doesn't prove he owned the rifle.  The photo is obviously a "POSED"  photo like a carnival photo that is intend as a gag, to deceive the viewer ....  It's so blatantly a staged photo ( ( the inclusion of the communist publications is "over the top" ) that is obviously intended to deceive the viewer into accepting the unspoken message.... " Look at me . I'm a hard core communist revolutionary who is armed and ready to fight for the revolution.

What a CROCK!!...   Why would anybody scrutinize and examine the photo under a magnifying glas??

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #254 on: June 28, 2022, 05:38:36 AM »

But that's not the end of the story....There are now 4 BY photos....so even  if Marina had taken CE 133A  and 133B WHERE DID THE OTHER TWO PHOTOS COME FROM???
Also...What ever happened to the rest of that roll of film?
 No picture of Marina [maybe with the kiddo]? A family shot or so? Just very strange.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6506
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #255 on: June 28, 2022, 12:21:55 PM »

billchapman

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #256 on: June 30, 2022, 03:22:53 AM »
Why did Michael Paine leave work and head to Irving before he had even heard about the shooting?
He lived in Grand Prairie.
Also, the police stated that "he didn't seem all that surprised at what had happened"."

Offline Paul J Cummings

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 169
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #257 on: June 30, 2022, 09:46:32 PM »
Even Kennedy said to Jackie where heading to nutsville. Given the atmosphere in Dallas in the fall of 1963 I believe that's why Michael Paine wasn't surprised.

Why did Michael Paine leave work and head to Irving before he had even heard about the shooting?
He lived in Grand Prairie.
Also, the police stated that "he didn't seem all that surprised at what had happened"."

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #258 on: June 30, 2022, 09:55:37 PM »
Even Kennedy said to Jackie where heading to nutsville. Given the atmosphere in Dallas in the fall of 1963 I believe that's why Michael Paine wasn't surprised.

Kennedy said to Jackie where heading to nutsville.

Yes, they were heading into LBJ country.... JFK knew the atmosphere was unstable and vile....  But he didn't appreciate just how corrupt and vile .....