Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar  (Read 111778 times)

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #21 on: June 05, 2022, 04:06:38 PM »
The burning question to me is not "Did Mrs Paine write "the rifle was purchased" on the calendar before Nov 22?
The question I have is why did she even write something like that on her calendar at all?
It seems really like such a senseless thing to do.

What difference does it make unless you are suggesting Paine was involved in a conspiracy?  Something I recall that you deny despite being fixated on her and suspicious of her every action for some unspecified reason!  LOL.  Maybe check her WC testimony.  She noted this information after seeing it reported on television meaning to note the date she learned of it as Nov. 23 instead of Oct. 23.  Obviously, she was acquainted with Oswald and Marina and was interested in understanding the timeline of events.  Placing the purchase date of the rifle in her calendar gave her some means of reference to her memory of events.

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #22 on: June 05, 2022, 11:57:17 PM »
It seems like Ruth was up to her eyeballs in the goings-on of this plot to kill JFK . She was CIA . No doubt !

Ruthie not tell truthie ....   Ruthie may have been affiliated with the both the CIA, and FBI....

I'm quite sure she was an informer for the FBI.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #23 on: June 06, 2022, 03:42:22 AM »
What difference does it make ....?
Apparently it depends upon how much fat you have between your ears.
Quote
Placing the purchase date of the rifle in her calendar gave her some means of reference to her memory of events.
Really? Why would she need that? I would think a copy of the newspapers would be enough.
With you there's naive or absolutely nothing at all. Mostly the latter.
Why not quit while you're still behind?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #24 on: June 06, 2022, 05:04:04 AM »
Apparently it depends upon how much fat you have between your ears. Really? Why would she need that? I would think a copy of the newspapers would be enough.
With you there's naive or absolutely nothing at all. Mostly the latter.
Why not quit while you're still behind?
Why not quit while you're still behind?

What??  Quit and lose that nice addition to his bank account every month......  You silly boy.

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #25 on: June 06, 2022, 05:49:21 AM »

I'm quite sure she was an informer for the FBI.
Here is a snippet of pickled red herring for you...


Quote
Mr. JENNER - When was the first time that you heard, or had any notice of the fact that this man had been in Mexico, or possibly may have been in Mexico?
Mrs. PAINE - They are two different questions. I will answer the first one. I heard that he had been in Mexico after the assassination in one of the papers.
You don't "hear" from reading a newspaper.
Quote
Mr. JENNER - Was that the first time?
Mrs. PAINE - Yes; that was the first time. Looking back then, with that knowledge, I could see that I might have guessed this from two other things, that had happened.
Mr. JENNER - All right, give us them in sequence, please.
Mrs. PAINE - One was, I can describe by an incident that took place at our home, I am not certain which weekend, one of the times that Lee was out. He wanted to drill a hole in a silver coin for Marina so she could wear it around her neck, and presumed to use my husband's drill press, which is one of the many things in the garage, and I complained. But he convinced me that he knew how to operate it and knew just what he was doing.
So I said, all right, and he proceeded to drill a hole in this coin, and then Marina showed it to me later. I didn't look closely at it. It wasn't until--although I could have perfectly well in this situation. I did see that it was a foreign coin.
Mr. JENNER - It was a what?
Mrs. PAINE - It was a foreign coin. It was not a coin I recognized. It was about the size of a silver dollar, but not as thick, as I remember it. And it was not then until perhaps a week or something less after the assassination when an, FBI agent asked me was there anything left in the house that would be pertinent, and he and I went together and looked in the drawer in the room where Marina had been staying, and found there this drilled coin, looked at it closely, and it was a peso, the Republic of Mexico. This is the first I had looked at it closely. Also, with this peso was a Spanish-English Dictionary.
My tendency to be very hesitant to look into other people's things was rather put aside at this point, and I was very curious to see what this book was, and I observed that the price of it, or what I took to be the price was in a corner at the front was not in English money, and at the back in his hand or somebody's hand in small scribble was the notation, "Buy tickets for bull fight, get silver bracelet for Marina" and there in the drawer also was a silver bracelet with the name Marina on it, which I took to be associated with this notation.
Mr. JENNER - Was it inscribed on the bracelet?
Mrs. PAINE - It was inscribed, the name Marina. And some picture post-cards with no message, just a picture of Mexico City in this dictionary, and these I gave to the FBI agent.
Mr. JENNER - Had you seen any of these items in your home at anytime prior to this occasion that you have now described?
Mrs. PAINE - None of these items except the peso which I had not noticed to be that, seen it, of course.
Mr. JENNER - Now, that is one incident.
Mrs. PAINE - That is one incident. Another refers to a rough draft of a letter that Lee wrote and left this rough draft on my secretary desk.
Mr. JENNER - Would you describe the incident? In the meantime, I will obtain the rough draft here among my notes.
Mrs. PAINE - All right. This was on the morning of November 9, Saturday. He asked to use my typewriter, and I said he might.
Mr. JENNER - Excuse me. Would you please. state to the Commission why you are reasonably firm that it was the morning of November 9? What arrests your attention to that particular date?
Mrs. PAINE - Because I remember the weekend that this note or rough draft remained on my secretary desk. He spent the weekend on it. And the weekend was close and its residence on that desk was stopped also on the evening of Sunday, the 10th, when I moved everything in the living room around; the whole arrangement of the furniture was changed, so that I am very clear in my mind as to what weekend this was.
Mr. JENNER - All right, go ahead.
Mrs. PAINE - He was using the typewriter. I came and put June in her high-chair near him at the table where he was typing, and he moved something over what he was typing from, which aroused my curiosity.
Mr. JENNER - Why did that arouse your curiosity?
Mrs. PAINE - It appeared he didn't want me to see what he was writing or to whom he was writing. I didn't know why he had covered it. If I had peered around him, I could have looked at the typewriter and the page in it, but I didn't.
Mr. JENNER - It did make you curious?
Mrs. PAINE - It did make me curious. Then, later that day, I noticed a scrawling handwriting on a piece of paper on the corner at the top of my secretary desk in the living room. It remained there.
Sunday morning I was the first one up. I took a closer look at this, a folded sheet of paper folded at the middle. The first sentence arrested me because I knew it to be false. And for this reason I then proceeded--
Mr. JENNER - Would you just hold it at that moment. This is for purposes of identification....

Jenner failed to allow Paine to complete her statement "For this reason I then proceeded". Why did he do that?
To shorten the post somewhat Mrs Paine stated that she first "heard" of Oswald's Mexico trip when she read it in the newspapers AFTER the assassination. Yet she saw the letter that Oswald was working on referring to the same incident BEFORE the assassination.
Can someone clarify that?
Who typed that final draft [above] of the letter?

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #26 on: June 06, 2022, 07:33:09 AM »

Who typed that final draft [above] of the letter?
OK yes I know the FBI typed it but who exactly was not identified and then again...why retype it anyway?
There was this---
Screenshot-2022-06-05-at-23-41-44-show-Doc-html" border="0
 
And this 'draft' [which Mrs Paine claimed she saw] and by all means revealed a certain recent travel to Mexico.



Why would Oswald write...."the birth of a daughter to my wife" instead of 'the birth of my daughter'?

Offline Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6008
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #27 on: June 06, 2022, 05:42:30 PM »
Apparently it depends upon how much fat you have between your ears. Really? Why would she need that? I would think a copy of the newspapers would be enough.
With you there's naive or absolutely nothing at all. Mostly the latter.
Why not quit while you're still behind?

Again, why does it matter if you don't believe she was involved in any conspiracy?  What point are you trying to make by understanding her subjective motivation for this action (whether you think it makes sense or not)?  Can you tell us that much instead of personal commentary and insults?   By noting the date in her calendar, it provides her a context to remember the timeframe by associating it with other events going on in her life.  Most people can't remember daily details of events that took place months beforehand without some prompting like a calendar.  She was likely curious if there was anything she could remember about Oswald's conduct that was noteworthy around that timeframe.