Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar  (Read 111797 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #35 on: June 07, 2022, 08:27:57 PM »
What’s with the childish “Jimbo” stuff, David? And he’s not even here. So why are you regaling us with conversations you saved that caused you to get kicked out of the other forum?

Do you honestly not find it odd as to why Ruth needed to make an annotation in her calendar about this at all, much less on the October page? And where does March 20 come from anyway, when the alleged purchase was on March 12?

And if suspicions about someone do not equal facts, then there goes your entire case against Oswald. Nice job!
« Last Edit: June 07, 2022, 08:29:58 PM by John Iacoletti »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #36 on: June 07, 2022, 09:58:13 PM »
And where does March 20 come from anyway.....?
Quote
March 20, 1963: The rifle and the revolver are shipped.
https://www.jfk-assassination.net/parnell/chrono.htm
Let's all mark this on our calendars  :-\

Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 589
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #37 on: June 07, 2022, 10:24:41 PM »
What’s with the childish “Jimbo” stuff, David?

That's due to the fact that DiEugenio was constantly referring to me as "Davy". So I would often reciprocate with Jimbo or Jimmy. Fair is fair, right?

And why don't you ask Jim about his childish way of referring to Ruth Paine. He would regularly attempt to demean her by calling her "Ruthy" and even "Ruthy baby". I just want to slap him silly when he does that.

I sure do wish Ruth would sue some of these crackpot CTers for slander before she leaves this Earth.


Quote
And he [DiEugenio] is not even here. So why are you regaling us with conversations you saved that caused you to get kicked out of the other forum?

Why not? Seemed fitting for this topic.

Why do you care anyway?


Quote
Do you honestly not find it odd as to why Ruth needed to make an annotation in her calendar about this at all, much less on the October page?

She didn't do it on the October calendar page. It was on her March page, which was the appropriate page for such a notation.

https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh17/html/WH_Vol17_0041b.htm

Was it odd? Well, I think it's even odder for CTers to think Ruth could be as stupid as they apparently do think she was. (See my last post for my thoughts on this.)


Quote
And where does March 20 come from anyway, when the alleged purchase was on March 12?

Again, see my last post. Ruth got the March 20 date from the news media (from Jesse Curry's Nov. 23rd hallway press gatherings).

Yes, the purchase date was March 12th, but Curry was referring to the shipping date, which was March 20th (which is the date that is shown on the "Waldman No. 7" internal Klein's form). Nothing sinister about that at all. But CTers think otherwise (naturally).


Quote
And if suspicions about someone do not equal facts, then there goes your entire case against Oswald. Nice job!

Attaboy, John! Just keep pretending that I have nothing at all to go on but "suspicions" and a gut feeling that Oswald was guilty, as you totally ignore (or deem as all fake) all of this stuff which hangs your favorite patsy twenty times over.
« Last Edit: June 07, 2022, 10:55:43 PM by David Von Pein »

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #38 on: June 07, 2022, 11:57:34 PM »

And why don't you ask Jim about his childish way of referring to Ruth Paine. He would regularly attempt to demean her by calling her "Ruthy" and even "Ruthy baby". I just want to slap him silly when he does that.
I sure do wish Ruth would sue some of these crackpot CTers for slander before she leaves this Earth.
I did not wish to demean. Apologies for any abject references....BTW I spelled it RUTHIE in the subject title. Can't change that [please don't slap]
Doubtful that she reads this forum anyway.
Ms Paine is 90 this year... is it feasible for her to sue now?
She was asked over 5000 questions in WC testimony. More even than Marina!
Why so ridiculously many? What an ordeal.... She witnessed absolutely no criminal activity at all concerning the events [as she testified] 

Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3723
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #39 on: June 08, 2022, 05:50:34 AM »

Yes, the purchase date was March 12th, but Curry was referring to the shipping date, which was March 20th (which is the date that is shown on the "Waldman No. 7" internal Klein's form). Nothing sinister about that at all. But CTers think otherwise (naturally).
Quote
March 20, 1963: The rifle and the revolver are shipped.
March 25, 1963: LHO picks up the weapons.
Am I the only one who wonders how it is that the weapons [though ordered supposedly around 8-9 weeks apart] could have been shipped on the same exact day from seemingly opposite ends of the country?
Was it so Harvey Hidell could conveniently pick them up together?
Might as well save him a trip huh?

Online David Von Pein

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 589
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #40 on: June 08, 2022, 11:34:50 AM »
Am I the only one who wonders how it is that the weapons [though ordered supposedly around 8-9 weeks apart] could have been shipped on the same exact day from seemingly opposite ends of the country?

Oswald very likely mailed both of the forms (for the rifle and the revolver) at the same time on March 12th, even though he wrote "January 27" on the Seaport Traders order form.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2022, 11:35:20 AM by David Von Pein »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Ruthie Paine's Confusing Calendar
« Reply #41 on: June 08, 2022, 02:24:43 PM »
Why not? Seemed fitting for this topic.

Seems fitting to try to drive more traffic to your website.

Quote
Attaboy, John! Just keep pretending that I have nothing at all to go on but "suspicions" and a gut feeling that Oswald was guilty, as you totally ignore (or deem as all fake) all of this stuff which hangs your favorite patsy twenty times over.

“All this stuff” which is mostly a series of suspicions and gut feelings. Like a wedding ring in a cup.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2022, 02:27:12 PM by John Iacoletti »