If a bullet didn't go through JFK, then exactly how did Connally get hit?

[John Iacoletti]

I would need to put IBM in quotations-- as you do, every time you mention them--to imply that he was lying or involved in something sinister.

Like you do.

I think you've finally lost the rest of your marbles.  I don't put "IBM men" in quotations every time I mention them, and if I do it's because I'm quoting Brewer or somebody else.  What you think I'm implying is just your overactive imagination.

[Allan Fritzke]

LNers don't ignore available images, including those modified or cropped by conspiracy buffs such as yourself.

You've cheated by cropping the motorcycle on the left.

Follow this link for further evidence of DPD motorcycles outfitted with antennae mounted exactly as seen in Dealey Plaza:

http://goo.gl/images/m37mPD

Those are pretty big statements you are making when you are ignoring my prior posts.  Look at my post #335.  Does it not come from an original posted on this site?   Do you as an LNer have any answer for why Zapruder Frames don't match the Willis original photograph?  You seem to think it is all about motorcycles and antennaes - a good LNer that keeps the blinders on a horse questioning nothing!   

From what I have posted in #335, it looks to me that someone has enlarged the Willis photo?  That is the only reason it has been cropped.   Everything I have seen from Jerry Organ or John Mytton is all cropped, none of the original full sized photos available are being used on this topic!  I am clearly pointing out the position of the umbrella man and asking the question why the Zapruder Frames ( including Jerry Organ's own lightbox frames) fail to match the Willis photograph found on this website.

You LNers fail to answer that and provide any answer.   You continue to ignore or come forward with a facetious comment about another CT kook!   If that is the best you can come up with is that I have modified or cropped photos, your ignorance surpasses your ability to look at prior posts and answer simple questions that are being asked.   Why attack the poster and not the argument they have put forward?   Argue facts, not opinions.

If you want to go back to the original Willis photo, go for it.  If you want to compare that to the Zapruder frames go for it.  I want to hear which one you believe is true!  Clearly there is a BIG difference in the umbrella location! Answer the obvious!   You can't have the cake and eat it too!   Which one do you see as true?   It seems LNers ignore logic at every turn possible!  These items are not a match.  Do you accept the Willis photograph as seen on this site as an absolute true photograph?


Or do you believe the Zapruder Frames where the umbrella and Cuban show up at the front of the sign?  You can see the tip of the umbrella starting to form in front of the sign at Z206 and it continues to grow from there.
https://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z206.jpg


These guys came out from where?

https://www.assassinationresearch.com/zfilm/z228.jpg

Answer that question as to why the Willis' photo  doesn't match the 20 frames or so where the umbrella is clearly at the front of the sign and not behind? Admit that you can't and won't.   I am waiting for your brilliant and scholarly answer.   My basis of logic is pictures and not in the written word.  The word, reports and testimony has to match the photographic evidence.   Each one of us can write a book, fact or fiction! I am waiting eagerly for your comment on this umbrella subject matter and these 21 photographs to compare to.

[John Iacoletti]

No, Kellerman didn't have time to turn around.

Didn't Greer supposedly turn his head 150 degrees between 316 and 317?

The first gif is Z198-Z219, just so you can get a good look at Kellerman.

You call that a good look? 

[John Iacoletti]

Answer that question as to why the Willis' photo  doesn't match the 20 frames or so where the umbrella is clearly at the front of the sign and not behind?

Allan, I'm not an "Oswald Did It" nut, but I'm not convinced that Willis shows the umbrella behind the sign.

[John Mytton]

Didn't Greer supposedly turn his head 150 degrees between 316 and 317?

Didn't Greer supposedly turn his head 150 degrees between 316 and 317?

We're talking about Kellerman, not Greer.

And we have footage of what it takes Kellerman to turn from the initial position to a point that looks behind.



Kellerman.



JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

We're talking about Kellerman, not Greer.

And we have footage of what it takes Kellerman to turn from the initial position to a point that looks behind.

Horse hockey.  If Greer can turn his head around in 1/18 of a second, then so could anyone else.

Note the big smile on Greer's mug.

[John Mytton]

Horse hockey.  If Greer can turn his head around in 1/18 of a second, then so could anyone else.

Sure and if Carl Lewis can run a hundred in 10 seconds then so can Al Bundy.

JohnM