Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Richard Smith]

   Has a chronic case of Belin-itus or Posner's Syndrome
 

To recap: 1) Freeman presented a demonstrably false premise (i.e. an individual must have a prior history as a homicidal maniac to be an assassin); 2) then he even screws up his facts by using the example of Charles Whitman who had no prior history of violence prior to the day of his rampage in contrast to Oswald who had a laundry list of red flags.  Well done!  You were 100% wrong on everything.  A perfect score.  And then the CTer defense of last resort when all else fails.  Oswald was framed for the attempt on Walker!  After he is already dead and the authorities are satisfied of his guilt they then have to pile on for some inexplicable reason and coerce Marina to lie, fabricate the note and photos of Walker's home etc.   If you want to play the Alice-in-Wonderland kook card that Oswald was framed and all the evidence is fake, then use that same standard to prove to us that Whitman murdered his wife and mother.   

[Gary Craig]

Key word 'yet' which eventually became 'cannot rule out' if memory serves

STEEL JACKET

[Gary Craig]

[Sean Kneringer]

JW Booth killed a President at his workplace as well. It's convenient. Why kill POTUS somewhere else when POTUS comes to you?

[Jerry Freeman]

   Oswald was framed for the attempt on Walker!   

Accurate statement. A dead guy is the easiest person to frame.
So far all these guys have is ...Oswald killed Kennedy because he was a homicidal maniac. How do they know he was a homicidal maniac?...Well, because after all-he killed Kennedy.
 

You didn't know Oswald was a trained USM, REALLY!?! 

  Recent events demonstrate you don't have to be trained to kill...to kill someone. However, Kennedy was indeed shot by professionally trained hitmen. Done clean and quickly.

[John Iacoletti]

Accurate statement. A dead guy is the easiest person to frame.
So far all these guys have is ...Oswald killed Kennedy because he was a homicidal maniac. How do they know he was a homicidal maniac?...Well, because after all-he killed Kennedy.

Yes, they're the masters of the circular argument.  Here's another one.

Oswald must have shot Kennedy because he lied in his interrogations.

What did he lie about?

He said he didn't shoot Kennedy.

[Jerry Freeman]

To recap: 1) Freeman presented a demonstrably false premise (i.e. an individual must have a prior history as a homicidal maniac to be an assassin);

Stop right there. Cite the actual reply number where I state exactly that an individual must have a prior history as a homicidal maniac to be an assassin); You can't because it doesn't exist. Post what you want but do not fabricate mine.