Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)  (Read 69650 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #184 on: October 31, 2018, 10:44:31 PM »
Advertisement
BS:



 BS: yourself.




Quote
Abrasion.

Wrinkles.

Well, I see yellow arrows.  I don't see any indication of how what they point to are uniquely identical.  This is the magic gouge all over again.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #184 on: October 31, 2018, 10:44:31 PM »


Online Fred Litwin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #185 on: October 31, 2018, 10:45:27 PM »
When you or Fred show that the HSCA were provided with the X-rays and photographs that were taken on November 22-23, 1963, then this will mean something. The extant versions do NOT match the wounds seen by numerous trained eyewitnesses.

There is no such thing as a trained eyewitness.

Offline W. Tracy Parnell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 345
    • W. Tracy Parnell Debunking JFK Conspiracy Theories
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #186 on: October 31, 2018, 10:47:54 PM »
When you or Fred show that the HSCA were provided with the X-rays and photographs that were taken on November 22-23, 1963, then this will mean something. The extant versions do NOT match the wounds seen by numerous trained eyewitnesses.

There is an extensive discussion of the Dallas doctors by the HSCA and they dealt with it. The Dallas doctors certainly are "trained" but not to be eyewitnesses. Law enforcement personal are trained to make off the cuff observations but doctors are not.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #186 on: October 31, 2018, 10:47:54 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #187 on: October 31, 2018, 11:05:41 PM »

 BS: yourself.

Well, I see yellow arrows.  I don't see any indication of how what they point to are uniquely identical.  This is the magic gouge all over again.

Quote
BS: yourself.

Thanks for posting that they also looked at the black and white photos, you said "They looked only at color photos...".

Quote
I don't see any indication of how what they point to are uniquely identical.

I don't expect you to see anything.

Quote
This is the magic gouge all over again.

What, the gouge verified by photographic experts and refuted by an "Internet Warrior", that gouge?
In the following GIF, the squiggly yellow lines show the gouge in C2766.



Here's a larger section and we can see the pristine surface at 1 and 1a as compared to 2 and 2a.



JohnM


« Last Edit: November 01, 2018, 02:14:06 AM by John Mytton »

Online Fred Litwin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 315
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #188 on: October 31, 2018, 11:54:24 PM »
There is an extensive discussion of the Dallas doctors by the HSCA and they dealt with it. The Dallas doctors certainly are "trained" but not to be eyewitnesses. Law enforcement personal are trained to make off the cuff observations but doctors are not.

Here is what four doctors at Parkland told NOVA:

Richard Dulaney
"I don't see evidence of any alteration of his wound in these pictures from what I saw in the emergency room."

Marion Jenkins
"Nothing that I've seen would make me think it had been changed from what happened that day."

Robert McClelland
"I find no discrepancy between the wounds as they're shown very vividly in these photographs and what I remember very vividly . . . "

Paul Peters
"Looking at these photos, they're pretty much as I remember President Kennedy at the time." Peters then mentions one minor discrepancy -- a small incision that he believes the autopsy doctors made while removing the brain.



JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #188 on: October 31, 2018, 11:54:24 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #189 on: November 01, 2018, 12:03:12 AM »

Here is what four doctors at Parkland told NOVA:

Richard Dulaney
"I don't see evidence of any alteration of his wound in these pictures from what I saw in the emergency room."

Marion Jenkins
"Nothing that I've seen would make me think it had been changed from what happened that day."

Robert McClelland
"I find no discrepancy between the wounds as they're shown very vividly in these photographs and what I remember very vividly . . . "

Paul Peters
"Looking at these photos, they're pretty much as I remember President Kennedy at the time." Peters then mentions one minor discrepancy -- a small incision that he believes the autopsy doctors made while removing the brain.


 Thumb1:



The Back of Head eyewitnesses were not very consistent.



But the real eyewitnesses are all a lot more consistent.



JohnM


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7413
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #190 on: November 01, 2018, 12:41:11 AM »
Thumb1:



The Back of Head eyewitnesses were not very consistent.



But the real eyewitnesses are all a lot more consistent.



JohnM

the real eyewitnesses

Translation; the ones I can misrepresent and thus prefer

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #190 on: November 01, 2018, 12:41:11 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #191 on: November 01, 2018, 12:56:07 AM »
the real eyewitnesses

Translation; the ones I can misrepresent and thus prefer

No, all these consistent eyewitnesses describe what we see in the autopsy photos, the Xrays, the Zapruder film, and the Nix and Muchmore films from the other side of Zapruder show matter going forward, and none of these films show any evidence of any rear explosion.



JohnM