I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)

[John Iacoletti]

Proof that Oswald killed Kennedy. Just read the volumes of evidence that the HSCA published. It's all pretty incriminating!

I have, and it isn't.  Care to try again?

[Fred Litwin]

I have, and it isn't.  Care to try again?

Not really. If that didn't convince you, I doubt there is ANYTHING I can say that will. And, I can
live with that.

[John Iacoletti]

Not really. If that didn't convince you, I doubt there is ANYTHING I can say that will. And, I can
live with that.

What is so convincing about "read the HSCA"?  There must be some reason you thought that their evidence pointed to Oswald as the murderer.  Or is it just a giant appeal to authority?  That's what they concluded, so it must be true?  Is your book just 272 pages of "the HSCA thought so"?

All one has to do is read the hearings and exhibits of the WC and the HSCA to realize that the conclusions are actually not supported by the underlying evidence.  They are just a bait and switch.

[Fred Litwin]

What is so convincing about "read the HSCA"?  There must be some reason you thought that their evidence pointed to Oswald as the murderer.  Or is it just a giant appeal to authority?  That's what they concluded, so it must be true?  Is your book just 272 pages of "the HSCA thought so"?

All one has to do is read the hearings and exhibits of the WC and the HSCA to realize that the conclusions are actually not supported by the underlying evidence.  They are just a bait and switch.

Read my book and you will see. I find it hard to just tell you a few things and debate them. There's a reason why I wrote an entire book. Look, just as one example, as Paul Hoch has written - the HSCA "took a stab at the tests the critics wanted - not completely, and not perfectly, but we expected that any one of the tests would demolish the WC reconstruction - neutron activation analysis, trajectory analysis. And they didn't."

That's an important sentence. And, yes, I know all about what has been said about neutron activation analysis. But, he's right. It's amazing at how all the tests support a lone gunman.

But, read my book. I challenge you (even though I know you won't).

[John Iacoletti]

That's an important sentence. And, yes, I know all about what has been said about neutron activation analysis. But, he's right. It's amazing at how all the tests support a lone gunman.

What's amazing is how you leap from neutron activation analysis and trajectory analysis to "Oswald did it".

But, read my book. I challenge you (even though I know you won't).

I realize you're just here to sell books, but I'm not going to waste $16.99 (or even $9.99) without knowing how you made that leap.  Sorry, there are plenty of books that go beyond "the HSCA said it, I believe it, and that settles it".

[Fred Litwin]

What's amazing is how you leap from neutron activation analysis and trajectory analysis to "Oswald did it".

I realize you're just here to sell books, but I'm not going to waste $16.99 (or even $9.99) without knowing how you made that leap.  Sorry, there are plenty of books that go beyond "the HSCA said it, I believe it, and that settles it".

Isn't it amazing. An author who wants people to read his book. Will miracles never cease?  Actually, I don't want you to read my book. It's clearly not for you. There's nothing I could write here that could persuade you to read it. And I am ok with that.

The HSCA didn't just "say it". They proved it. As Paul Hoch said, any one of their tests could have disproved the Warren Commission. And they didn't.

[Rob Caprio]

The WC never proved anything so it was impossible for the HSCA to disprove anything that they claimed.