I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)

[Fred Litwin]

Whatever. It is clear that you cannot cite any supporting evidence for LHO being a shooter let alone the only shooter. There is no need to continue.

By the way, the HSCA said that it was very likely that a conspiracy killed JFK. Thanks for responding.

I can cite lots of evidence that Oswald was the only shooter. But, I don't think you should be lazy. Read the supporting volumes of HSCA evidence. There
are several volumes. It's all very, very conclusive.

Yes, the HSCA concluded conspiracy but that was based on the acoustics evidence, and that was found by the NAS tp be nothing of the sort.

[Micah Mileto]

I can cite lots of evidence that Oswald was the only shooter. But, I don't think you should be lazy. Read the supporting volumes of HSCA evidence. There
are several volumes. It's all very, very conclusive.

Yes, the HSCA concluded conspiracy but that was based on the acoustics evidence, and that was found by the NAS tp be nothing of the sort.

The HSCA's conclusions on the skull photographs is false because it necessitates the entire brain fitting through a skull cavity that is only 5 inches. Since the HSCA contends that both the entry and exit are visible in the same photo, yet the photos show the skull empty, after the brain had been removed.

[Larry Trotter]

As stated in a previous post: For me, the SecondFloorLunchRoomEncounter involving DPD Officer ML Baker and TSBD Bldg Superintendent RS Truly with LHO at about 12:31pm CST, indicates a timing problem for the LHO/LGA Theory.

Timing is used to refer to the time at which something happens or is planned to happen, or to the length of time something takes.

[Nicholas Turner]

Timing is used to refer to the time at which something happens or is planned to happen, or to the length of time something takes.

Yes. And?

[Rob Caprio]

I can cite lots of evidence that Oswald was the only shooter. But, I don't think you should be lazy. Read the supporting volumes of HSCA evidence. There
are several volumes. It's all very, very conclusive.

Yes, the HSCA concluded conspiracy but that was based on the acoustics evidence, and that was found by the NAS tp be nothing of the sort.

Lazy? I have a massive series on the WC and one on the HSCA. I am very familiar with the evidence in this case. I was not asking you to cite to save me research time, but rather to see what evidence turned you from believing in a conspiracy to believing that LHO did it alone. It is apparent that you cannot cite any and something else caused this change in all likelihood.

It wasn't based solely on the acoustics. Many aspects of the HSCA's work pointed to conspiracy. The acoustics were the reason given, but it wasn't the only one. The head of the HSCA thought that the mob was involved for goodness sake.

[Fred Litwin]

Lazy? I have a massive series on the WC and one on the HSCA. I am very familiar with the evidence in this case. I was not asking you to cite to save me research time, but rather to see what evidence turned you from believing in a conspiracy to believing that LHO did it alone. It is apparent that you cannot cite any and something else caused this change in all likelihood.

It wasn't bssed solely on the acoustics. Many aspects of the HSCA's work pointed to conspiracy. The acoustics were the reason given, but it wasn't the only one. The head of the HSCA thought that the mob was involved for goodness sake.

Blakey wrote a book saying the mob did it. But the HSCA did NOT conclude that it was the mob.

The draft report of the HSCA, written right before the acoustics, did not say there was a conspiracy.

If you want to see more of why I changed my mind, read my book. I am not going to post 272 pages here. But, if you don't want to read it, that is OK with me. I'd rather that certain people NOT read it.

fred

[John Iacoletti]

All you have to do is to read the HSCA supporting volumes of evidence. As Paul Hoch noted in one of his newsletters (I am paraphrasing here) - the HSCA did a lot of scientific
tests, and any one of them could have refuted the Warren Commission, and they didn't. Read the reports of the various panels on the HSCA - forensic, ballistics, photographic, etc. and
the evidence all supports Lee Harvey Oswald as the lone gunman.

This is fascinating.  What ballistics analysis could ever determine who did the shooting?  What forensic analysis?