I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)  (Read 197334 times)

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #133 on: October 29, 2018, 02:36:00 PM »
I've cited a lot of evidence. You just don't like it. Take the forensic pathology panel of the HSCA. The best forensic pathologists of the United States agreed that Kennedy was hit by two shots from behind. Or how about all the other forensic pathologists who have examined the autopsy x-rays and photographs. They also agree that Kennedy was hit by two shots from behind.

As a reporter and author you should understand what constitutes a cite. You have made vague references to things, but you have NOT cited any evidence. All LNers are allergic to the actual evidence since it doesn't support their claims.

Your points are very weak since no one on the HSCA panel saw JFK's body. Furthermore, the autopsy X-rays and photographs have never been shown to be authentic and a true depiction of the wounds seen on JFK's body. Moreover, they are in direct conflict to the wounds actually observed by those that did see JFK's body after the assassination.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #134 on: October 29, 2018, 05:08:31 PM »
I've cited a lot of evidence. You just don't like it. Take the forensic pathology panel of the HSCA. The best forensic pathologists of the United States agreed that Kennedy was hit by two shots from behind. Or how about all the other forensic pathologists who have examined the autopsy x-rays and photographs. They also agree that Kennedy was hit by two shots from behind.

How does that tell you who the shooter was?

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #135 on: October 29, 2018, 06:12:53 PM »
As a reporter and author you should understand what constitutes a cite. You have made vague references to things, but you have NOT cited any evidence. All LNers are allergic to the actual evidence since it doesn't support their claims.

Your points are very weak since no one on the HSCA panel saw JFK's body. Furthermore, the autopsy X-rays and photographs have never been shown to be authentic and a true depiction of the wounds seen on JFK's body. Moreover, they are in direct conflict to the wounds actually observed by those that did see JFK's body after the assassination.

The autopsy X-Rays and photographs were authenticated.

See:

HSCA Volume VI, page 232 - anthropological analysis
                          [age 239  - analysis of x-rays

Proves that the x-rays and photographs are those of JFK

Volume VII, page 43:  Report of Ellis Kerly, Phd, and Clyde Snow, Phd. anthopological consultants

Volume VII, page 63:  Report of Lowell Levine, DDS, on dential identification

Volume VII, page 69 - Report of Frank Scott, medical photographer on the authenticity of the color photographs.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #136 on: October 29, 2018, 07:14:00 PM »
The autopsy X-Rays and photographs were authenticated.

See:

HSCA Volume VI, page 232 - anthropological analysis
                          [age 239  - analysis of x-rays

Proves that the x-rays and photographs are those of JFK

Volume VII, page 43:  Report of Ellis Kerly, Phd, and Clyde Snow, Phd. anthopological consultants

Volume VII, page 63:  Report of Lowell Levine, DDS, on dential identification

Volume VII, page 69 - Report of Frank Scott, medical photographer on the authenticity of the color photographs.

If these experts weren't at Bethesda Naval Hospital on 11/22/63 to see the X-rays and photographs then, how can they authenticate the ones presented to them in the 1970s? Please explain that.

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #137 on: October 29, 2018, 08:09:25 PM »
If these experts weren't at Bethesda Naval Hospital on 11/22/63 to see the X-rays and photographs then, how can they authenticate the ones presented to them in the 1970s? Please explain that.

Perhaps you should read the sections I have cited, and then ask your questions. Have you read the HSCA volumes or not?

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #138 on: October 29, 2018, 10:36:13 PM »
Perhaps you should read the sections I have cited, and then ask your questions. Have you read the HSCA volumes or not?

You didn't answer my question. How did they know that these were X-rays and photographs taken during the JFK autopsy?

Online Fred Litwin

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 588
Re: I Was a Teenage JFK Conspiracy Freak (new book)
« Reply #139 on: October 29, 2018, 10:38:04 PM »
You didn't answer my question. How did they know that these were X-rays and photographs taken during the JFK autopsy?

I did, but you don't like my answer. Have you read the HSCA Volumes of evidence?  Why don't you read the authentication
reports that I referenced. You might find the answers you are looking for?