Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 465970 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #714 on: June 03, 2018, 04:23:50 AM »
This is good enough for most people (well, those who aren't in serious denial about Oswald being a cop-killer):

Translation from Bill-speak:  "people who don't agree with my unsupported conjectures are in serious denial"

Feel free to point out where in that video Burroughs says he saw Oswald come in the theater.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #715 on: June 03, 2018, 04:24:36 AM »
You're the king of straw man arguments.

Howard Gee did not say that Oswald was guilty of murder just because he entered the theater without paying for a ticket.

I never said he did.  Nice, you made a strawman argument about a strawman argument.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #716 on: June 03, 2018, 04:27:58 AM »
If you were truly interested in what really happened, at the very minimum you would accept that Oswald was wearing a jacket as he left that house.

I accept that Roberts thought he came into the house and left wearing a jacket.  Just like she thought a police car pulled up and honked its horn twice.  Why is it that you consider your opinion and the truth to be synonymous?
« Last Edit: June 03, 2018, 04:40:34 AM by John Iacoletti »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 11351
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #717 on: June 03, 2018, 04:30:38 AM »
Unrelated.

I'll ask again (since you avoided answering it the first time), Julia Postal left the booth and went out to the sidewalk.  Who do you suppose could have sold a ticket to Oswald?

Not unrelated at all.  You're assuming that Oswald entered the theater when Julia Postal left the booth and went out to the sidewalk, which you don't actually know because nobody saw him enter the theater.

Offline Michael Chambers

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 55
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #718 on: June 03, 2018, 04:32:44 AM »
A thing I see as a conundrum if you are saying the housekeeper saw him zipping a jacket is that you are
also saying Oswald couldn't be at the Tippit crime scene.


In that local TV started broadcasting JFK at 12.58pm. Sometime after this Earlene Roberts friend rings her to tell her of it.

Now we are at 12.59-1.00pm. Then or later Oswald/Unsub enters and spends 3-4 minutes in room. Then another 1 minute going to bus stop.

Oswald is at bus stop 1.05 -06pm when last seen, so possibly longer and Tippit is shot 1.08.30 latest.  8) ;) Walk: :) :)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2034
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #719 on: June 03, 2018, 04:35:03 AM »
No, they saw a gun in the hands of a person who they identified in an unfair, biased, and unreliable lineup or from a single photo months later.

But since when does having a gun in one's hands prove that the person just murdered somebody?  I guess Callaway was guilty of murder too.  He had a gun in his hands at the scene of the crime.

Do you really want to compare Oswald running from the scene immediately after the shots rang out with a gun in his hands... with Callaway taking Tippit's service revolver and recruiting Scoggins' cab to go look for the killer at a point in time when Tippit's body was already headed to Methodist Hospital?

You're nuttier than a port?a-?potty at a peanut festival.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2034
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #720 on: June 03, 2018, 04:36:46 AM »
Translation from Bill-speak:  "people who don't agree with my unsupported conjectures are in serious denial"

Feel free to point out where in that video Burroughs says he saw Oswald come in the theater.

And you like to constantly accuse me of being the one who plays word games.  What do you have against the police?  I'm curious.