Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[Bill Brown]

...in biased and unfair lineups or from a single photo months later.

But is this supposed to prove who shot Tippit?

All of the witnesses saw a gun in Oswald's hands.  You made the ill-advised attempt to imply that these witnesses saw nothing more than Oswald as being "a person near or some distance away from the scene of the shooting".  You conveniently left out the part where each witness stated he was running with a gun.

[Bill Brown]

Highly dishonest.  Burroughs never claimed even in 1988 to have seen Oswald come in the theater.  There's no contradiction here.

This is good enough for most people (well, those who aren't in serious denial about Oswald being a cop-killer):

[Bill Brown]

If that's not evidence of murder then I don't know what is.

 

You're the king of straw man arguments.

Howard Gee did not say that Oswald was guilty of murder just because he entered the theater without paying for a ticket. 

[Howard Gee]

Come to think of it, how do we know Tim Nickerson didn't photoshop the pictures he posted to make the jacket appear white ??

Attention all kooks: Tim Nickerson is now officially a suspect in the frame Saint Oz conspiracy !

[Bill Brown]

Mrs. ROBERTS. Well, you know, I can't see too good how to read. I'm completely blind in my right eye.


It is extreme desperation to claim that Buell Wesley Frazier, who had 20/20 vision and saw Oswald for much longer that Earlene Roberts was mistaken about what he saw.... Oswald carrying the package in the cup of his hand and tucked under his armpit!

It is nothing more than a lame (and desperate) Brown argument.  Pathetic really.

Another straw man.

The bottom line is that Roberts saw enough to know that Oswald was wearing a jacket as he left the house, specifically noticing that he was zipping it up as he went out the door.  You have to live with that.

One can believe in a conspiracy all they wish.  One can even believe that someone other than Oswald murdered J.D. Tippit.  But, to argue that Roberts couldn't have really seen Oswald as he left the house is dishonest.

You claim that you don't defend Oswald, that you're only interested in the truth.  If you were truly interested in what really happened, at the very minimum you would accept that Oswald was wearing a jacket as he left that house.  Only a true Kook would really attempt to argue that Roberts really could not have seen Oswald well enough to see him leave the house.

The bottom line is that you clearly are not interested in the truth, whatever it may be.

[John Iacoletti]

You're right again, Johnboi.

By itself, Brewer witnessing someone acting suspiciously and taking action which led to your hero being apprehended isn't evidence of murder.

Thank you.  You've just inadvertently admitted that the cops had no probable cause to search, beat up, and arrest Oswald for murder in the theater.  Nice job.

However, it does destroy your narrative that Brewer just saw 'a person' walking towards the theater. There's no doubt that the person Brewer saw, entered the theater, and that person's name was Lee Harvey Oswald, AKA Saint Oz.

BS.  Brewer saw a guy who looked funny in front of his shop and by the time he got around his counter and out on the sidewalk he spotted a guy from the back down the street in front of the Furniture Mart who he just assumed was the same guy.  And he didn't even see that guy enter the theater.

The same Saint Oz who wasn't wearing a jacket when arrested but whose shirt fibers were found in the jacket ditched under a car in a lot through which JDT's assailent fled.

BS again.  The best they could say was that those fibers could have come from the shirt.  But the jacket in the parking lot doesn't prove anybody shot anybody anyway, so it's not evidence.

Poor Saint Oz was having a really, really bad day.

Not nearly as bad as the day you're having.

Next up: Hairless goofball says Oswald's shirt fibers in a jacket aren't evidence of murder.

You finally got something right.  Feel free to explain how they are.  Maybe you can do it without re-defining the word "disappeared" this time.

[John Iacoletti]

He said the jacket was white for the same reason that people would say the the jacket seen in the pics below is white.

A parking lot is still not a museum.