Roger Craig

[Paul J Cummings]

Brennan is an unreliable witness. He's been so inconsistent with the description of the person he saw to the rifle. If you're relying on Brennan to nail Oswald then I suggest you read all his statements. You will find out he's over all the place about what he saw. 

So LHO was just aiming his rifle at the president. For what reason?

There is not a muzzle flash that is true. Maybe McCloy should have asked Brennan did you see him fire his rifle. He said he saw him "fire" his rifle in both the Dallas Morning News story and his FBI 11/22 affidavit. Your assuming he knew that discharged meant fire the gun instead of eject the shell.

"he saw this person take "deliberate aim" and fire a shot."

Brennan sees LHO aim the rifle, he hears the shot, and he sees him put the gun down to his side, stand there and view the damage but he did not see him he fire the shot? He never took his eyes off of the assassin.

[John Iacoletti]

Alyea created quite a fantasy with himself at the center. I wonder if he is Rowland's real dad and maybe Craig's brother. Seems to be no shortage of these type of people in this assassination.

Seems like anybody whose account differs from the narrative gets their character assassinated by Jack Nessan. Talk about desperately believing what you want to hear.

[John Iacoletti]

So LHO was just aiming his rifle at the president. For what reason?

LHO. LOL.

Brennan sees LHO aim the rifle, he hears the shot, and he sees him put the gun down to his side, stand there and view the damage but he did not see him he fire the shot? He never took his eyes off of the assassin.

How do you know a shot was fired if you see no discharge, muzzle blast, or recoil?

[John Iacoletti]

No, they found the bullet and bullet fragments and they were matched to the rifle.

That’s a circular argument. I asked you what evidence there was to show that the bullet and fragments in question caused Kennedy’s wounds.

[Dan O'meara]

Those videos showed nothing. They recreated that scene for the cameras just like in Iwo Jima.

Could you just run us through the timeline of when the "original rifle" was found, and by whom, and when the "recreation" took place.

[Paul J Cummings]

I did but apparently you chose to ignore it.

Could you just run us through the timeline of when the "original rifle" was found, and by whom, and when the "recreation" took place.

[Dan O'meara]

I did but apparently you chose to ignore it.

No, you didn't.
You've mentioned assassination teams firing from the 5th floor (obviously you provide no evidence for this tinfoil claim).
You seem to believe that everyone involved in the discovery of the rifle was part of a "recreation" but that they originally "recreated" a Mauser then decided to "recreate" a Carcano.
Were they all in it together or were there two "teams" recreating different rifle discoveries?
It's very difficult to know what scenario you are actually putting forward as it seems to change as each point you make is shot down in flames.
Just sayin'