Roger Craig

[John Iacoletti]

The only possible explanation for the wound in JBC's back is for the bullet to first pass through JFK.

 

Only if you preassume where the bullet that wounded Connally came from.

[John Iacoletti]

Another case of incriminating evidence but the film was destroyed leaving the story as a case of I said, he said who do you want to believe.

Nice two-step. First it’s “Kritzberg misquoted him”. Now it’s “he’s not believable”.

[Jack Nessan]

Nice two-step. First it’s “Kritzberg misquoted him”. Now it’s “he’s not believable”.

Everyone but Alyea is lying or at least according to him.

What two step? First, Alyea is the one who stated Kritzberg misquoted him.

I guess there is a fist time for everything. Every piece of evidence is always dismissed for lack of proof. Now, and this is new, you accept Alyea's statements with nothing but his memory as proof. He is basically stating the DPD, FBI, and Dallas Sheriffs Office were all in on a giant conspiracy to deceive but he lacks any evidence at all. Is it because he is stating something you desperately want to believe and want to hear?

How about another view of Alyea, he did make the statements to Kritzberg and he then claims she misquoted him. He then claims DPD, Sheriffs Dept, and FBI all are lying about how they investigated the 6th floor but his evidence of this has been destroyed. The only person telling the truth, in the whole group of people investigating the assassination, was Alyea or at least in his mind. Alyea created quite a fantasy with himself at the center. I wonder if he is Rowland's real dad and maybe Craig's brother. Seems to be no shortage of these type of people in this assassination.

[Jack Nessan]

Only if you preassume where the bullet that wounded Connally came from.

Presume what you would like but with the position of the men and how close they were together the only way to explain it was JFK himself caused the wound.

[Jack Nessan]

“His rifle”. LOL.

Mr. McCLOY. Did you see the rifle explode? Did you see the flash of what was either the second or the third shot?
Mr. BRENNAN. No.
Mr. McCLOY. Could you see that he had discharged the rifle?
Mr. BRENNAN. No.

So LHO was just aiming his rifle at the president. For what reason?

There is not a muzzle flash that is true. Maybe McCloy should have asked Brennan did you see him fire his rifle. He said he saw him "fire" his rifle in both the Dallas Morning News story and his FBI 11/22 affidavit. Your assuming he knew that discharged meant fire the gun instead of eject the shell.

"he saw this person take "deliberate aim" and fire a shot."

Brennan sees LHO aim the rifle, he hears the shot, and he sees him put the gun down to his side, stand there and view the damage but he did not see him he fire the shot? He never took his eyes off of the assassin.

[Jack Nessan]

So no evidence then that they inflicted wounds in Kennedy.

No, they found the bullet and bullet fragments and they were matched to the rifle. LHO's rifle.

So the cause of the wounds was indeterminate? The fragments were found in the car. The bullet on a stretcher in the hospital.

[Bill Chapman]

So LHO was just aiming his rifle at the president. For what reason?

There is not a muzzle flash that is true. Maybe McCloy should have asked Brennan did you see him fire his rifle. He said he saw him "fire" his rifle in both the Dallas Morning News story and his FBI 11/22 affidavit. Your assuming he knew that discharged meant fire the gun instead of eject the shell.

"he saw this person take "deliberate aim" and fire a shot."

Brennan sees LHO aim the rifle, he hears the shot, and he sees him put the gun down to his side, stand there and view the damage but he did not see him he fire the shot? He never took his eyes off of the assassin.

Perhaps some eagle-eyed Oswald arse kisser can point us to some other location where one can observe a muzzle-flash licking its way out of a high powered rifle while pointed in the general direction of the presidential limo..