Parkland Confusions

[Rob Caprio]

I'm defending the truth.  If the best argument you have for Oswald's guilt is "hey, look how kooky conspiracy theories are", then you have no argument.

Meanwhile, they fully support the most ridiculous theory of all -- the SBT. 🤣

[Rob Caprio]

Let's not forget, or act like, Dallas was the only place the conspirators had in mind as there is evidence for places like Chicago, Miami, Tampa and Los Angeles as well.

A pliable police force was important.

[Dillon Rankine]

I'm defending the truth.

LOL.

What?s the truth? By which I hope you mean the closest thing we can know, as any other definition of truth isn?t liable to be obtained by anything.   

[Gary Craig]

Your conspirators could have killed Kennedy anywhere in America and patsy's were apparently a dime a dozen, so if this was planned with an ounce of competency they would have done the crime where they had control you know like in Washington and maybe near Bethesda, so they could at least have control of the body and evidence but instead they did it on the other side of the country and then on top of that went to a lot of trouble to get the body and evidence out of there. Where does that make sense besides on Planet Kook?

But the reality is that Mohammed didn't have to go to the Mountain, the mountain came to Mohammed.

JohnM

Photos of the entrance wound at the EOP, observed and photographed at autopsy, and problematic with a

bullet fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD, disappeared.

Photos of JFK's right lung/chest, which would have shown the direction and path of the magic bullet also

disappeared.

The location of both those wounds were changed to fit the official narrative, courtesy of Jerry Ford and the

Clark Panel.

[Howard Gee]

Was JFK shot in the temple?

Malcolm Kilduff famously pointed to his right temple when describing JFK?s wound. He also clarified to reporters that he had somehow cane upon the knowledge of a right temporal injury. Dr. Malcolm Perry, as per a WOR radio broadcast, apparently agreed, as did Dr. Kemp Clark in the NBC log. JFK was apparently shot ?in the front as he faced the assailant.?

I think the 'shot in the front as he faced the assailant' quote stems from the initial belief that the trachestomy incision was made over an entrance wound to the throat.

Of course, using common sense we know that the throat wound couldn't have possibly been an entrance wound, as there is no exit wound and no bullet was found in JFK's neck.

And unless you believe the Zapruder film has been altered it's pretty clear JFK was hit in the head once, and one time only. From the rear.

All this talk of perfectly synchronized head shots, entry wounds to the throat and/or right or left temple is a bunch of rubbish.

[Dillon Rankine]

I think the 'shot in the front as he faced the assailant' quote stems from the initial belief that the trachestomy incision was made over an entrance wound to the throat.

Of course, using common sense we know that the throat wound couldn't have possibly been an entrance wound, as there is no exit wound and no bullet was found in JFK's neck.

And unless you believe the Zapruder film has been altered it's pretty clear JFK was hit in the head once, and one time only. From the rear.

All this talk of perfectly synchronized head shots, entry wounds to the throat and/or right or left temple is a bunch of rubbish.

The Z-film gives little indication as to the directionality of the gunshot.

The point of this post was to highlight that the ER staff aren?t quite the trustworthy ?expert witnesses? they?re often portrayed as, and to point out that we can?t judge the veracity of any perception based on the qualifications of the observer.

[Howard Gee]

The Z-film gives little indication as to the directionality of the gunshot.

The point of this post was to highlight that the ER staff aren?t quite the trustworthy ?expert witnesses? they?re often portrayed as, and to point out that we can?t judge the veracity of any perception based on the qualifications of the observer.

Completely disagree that the Zapruder film gives little indication of directionality.

The forward movement of JFK's head at the moment of impact and the splatter is conclusive proof of a shot from the rear.