Whose Target was General Edwin Walker?

[Jerry Freeman]

  take a look at his position on the so called palm print ....alleged "palm Print" ( CE 639 ).

Have a glance at CE 640
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1134#relPageId=318&tab=page
That's about as clear as something that may have been flushed down the toilet this morning! 

Strange that in his letter, Hoover tells Rankin that no statements concerning the palmprint had been made to the press. Why not? Henry Wade had no problem lying to the press about non-existant fingerprints being found on the rifle on 11/23/63!
CE 2584 - Letter dated July 27, 1964, from FBI to Commission concerning palmprint taken from assassination rifle (CD 1308).
https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html?docId=1141#relPageId=887&tab=page

[Jerry Freeman]

No one would think that obviously.

If however you have two or more in a pocket grabbing them in one go would require an action not dissimilar to grabbing a few coins from a pocket. That's when a partial palm print could result.

I might suppose so...if your hand is the size of a tic-tac
Fingerprint guys are good....but not that good.

[Steve Howsley]

I might suppose so...if your hand is the size of a tic-tac
Fingerprint guys are good....but not that good.

So you think the print is of a complete adult palm? Weird.

[Walt Cakebread]

I might suppose so...if your hand is the size of a tic-tac
Fingerprint guys are good....but not that good.

It does seem highly unlikely that a palm print of an adult man could be deposited on a .38 caliber shell casing....
little Organ ( the one between his ears) posted that just to draw the debate away from the smudge that the "experts" called  "the right palm print of Lee Harrrrrrvey Osssssswald "

[Rob Caprio]

Pssst Robbie... Have you ever heard the old axiom.....  "A single picture is worth a thousand words."  ?

Well if one picture is worth a thousand words.... and there are dozens of photos that show the rifle and PROVE that it was a model 91/38 Mannlicher Carcano, why would you want a written report??    Clearly you are irrational.

Psst....Those photos show a Carcano, but so what? That doesn't preclude another rifle from being found also. You are playing games

You can't cite any report. You know it and I know it.

[Rob Caprio]

Well, with people like you (and Wecht, Fetzer, Cinque, Prudhomme, Groden, Waldon and Marsh) as "expert witnesses", we see how that turned out.

It's not surprising that you couldn't care less about Constitutional rights since you live in Canada.

[Walt Cakebread]

Psst....Those photos show a Carcano, but so what? That doesn't preclude another rifle from being found also. You are playing games

You can't cite any report. You know it and I know it.

On page 40, Sept 27,  reply #392      Robbie wrote:

Wally is still ignoring the evidence. Cite a report that says it was a 6.5 Carcano.

But now Robbie acknowledges that the rifle that was found buried beneath the pallets of books was a model 91/38 Mannlicher  Carcano.

Robbie wrote:...Those photos show a Carcano, but so what?

So you do know the rifle was a carcano.....(because your eyes told you that)   So why do you need a report?   Just gouge your lying eyes out .....