Z-317 shows no rearward blowout

[John Iacoletti]

Craig Lamson's graphic showing a 7? tilt when the perspective is corrected. True-verticals were found by Craig on the house, the post behind the left shoulder and the vertical on the far-right of the shed.

Interesting.  I know Craig still lurks here.  How was it determined that these are true verticals?  PM is fine.

[Ray Mitcham]

Glad to see that Lamson agrees with me  that Farid was wrong when he said Oswald was leaning at 5˚. If he was wrong in this, then why take his word on his comments on the nose shadows?

[Ray Mitcham]

As far as I know, Lamson never said he disagreed with Farid. He has told me he disagrees with 10˚, which was your figure and for which you have yet to provide a graphic justification.

Let's not forget that in 133A, Oswald's left side is closer to the camera than the right. This would contribute, I would think, some perspective distortion to an angle of tilt.



Farid's model (when shown more true-on) seems to show a 5˚ tilt.

The world's greatest photographer (IHOO) says that Oswald was leaning at a greater angle the  Farid said, so by default he is disagreeing with Farid. Whether ia m correct or not is immaterial. A lone nutter has agreed  that the so called expert, Farid, was wrong, which is  what I have said all along.

[Ray Mitcham]

Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

Farid says that Oswald was leaning at an angle of 5˚. Lamson says 7˚. Only to a lone nutter would this mean that they don't disagree about the angle of lean.

And bask in the self-illusion that you're smarter than them all.

Not at all. Just pointing out that Farid was not infallible. Maybe you believe you are.

[John Iacoletti]

Rather than check out what I said in my previous post about perspective possibly being a factor, you would rather promote a false narrative that Lamson and Craig are in disagreement.

Lamson and Craig are the same person.

[Ray Mitcham]

Lamson and Craig are the same person.

Lamson and Craig regularly disagree with each other. They are both very disagreeable.

[Ray Mitcham]

Hey, Ray. How's that Mitcham fellow -- who talked something about 10˚ -- doing these days?

He's fine Jerry. How's that guy, Organ, who believes in the daft single bullet theory doing?