JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate
Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?
Colin Crow:
--- Quote from: John Mytton on June 15, 2018, 07:54:00 AM ---
You're inventing a problem where none exists.
But the basic fundamental evidence of Oswald's lies while in custody seems to be a subject that you people simply won't debate!
JohnM
--- End quote ---
If it helps you, I think he lied. I know you are good with graphics.....can you show me something that indicates the bag was ever sealed at both ends? Or describe how it might have been?
Howard Gee:
--- Quote from: Colin Crow on June 15, 2018, 10:41:15 AM ---If it helps you, I think he lied. I know you are good with graphics.....can you show me something that indicates the bag was ever sealed at both ends? Or describe how it might have been?
--- End quote ---
Yeah, I think he lied too.
I'm guessing he didn't have his lunch in the bag.
Can't imagine what might have been in the bag.
Anyway, has anyone ever considered that if there was a rifle in the bag, that it might not have been in a completely north/south 180 degree vertical position ?
The bag appears wide enough to me, to accomodate a long straight object diagonally or at somewhat of a 45 degree angle.
Let's say the butt of the rifle was in the lower left of the bag and the muzzle was oriented to the top right.
I'm guessing that might add a few inches to the equation.
Just a thought.
Tim Nickerson:
--- Quote from: Jerry Freeman on June 15, 2018, 04:40:40 AM ---After reviewing the thread...and the idea that Oswald spirited a disassembled rifle to the car and to the building and through the building without getting quizzed -'Hey whatcha got there?'...by anybody....is comical at best.
Drivel?...Oh I'm guilty too maybe..occasionally
Did we not see the video I posted where Wes Frazier renounced his entire testimony [now that he feels safe to do so] ??
--- End quote ---
Renounced his entire testimony did he? Ever heard of Mary Hollies? She renounced her testimony as well. :D
Jack Trojan:
Sheep-dipping 101. Oswald was the designated patsy so they had him pose in the backyard with both murder weapons and carry a suspicious bag into the TSBD. But had he smuggled in the MC then he didn't reassemble or fire it because there were no prints on the stalk, barrel, clip, ammo, trigger or scope. How was that possible if he manhandled every part of the rifle disassembling and reassembling it?
Oswald obviously never fired the rifle before because he would have zeroed the wonky scope. Every military marksman knows a scope is useless unless it's sighted in beforehand. There is no way he would have included a useless scope in the paper bag if he intended to use the iron sights instead.
You LNers need to address all this before quibbling over whether the disassembled rifle would even fit in the bag. And even if Oswald did smuggle in the rifle, he didn't reassemble or fire it, otherwise, what happened to his latex gloves?
Steve Howsley:
--- Quote from: Jack Trojan on June 16, 2018, 12:20:44 AM ---Sheep-dipping 101. Oswald was the designated patsy so they had him pose in the backyard with both murder weapons and carry a suspicious bag into the TSBD. But had he smuggled in the MC then he didn't reassemble or fire it because there were no prints on the stalk, barrel, clip, ammo, trigger or scope. How was that possible if he manhandled every part of the rifle disassembling and reassembling it?
Oswald obviously never fired the rifle before because he would have zeroed the wonky scope. Every military marksman knows a scope is useless unless it's sighted in beforehand. There is no way he would have included a useless scope in the paper bag if he intended to use the iron sights instead.
You LNers need to address all this before quibbling over whether the disassembled rifle would even fit in the bag. And even if Oswald did smuggle in the rifle, he didn't reassemble or fire it, otherwise, what happened to his latex gloves?
--- End quote ---
How about he wiped his prints? Ever considered that?
The bag is only "suspicious" in hindsight.
There is no way he would have included a useless scope in the paper bag if he intended to use the iron sights instead.
Do you have some insight to Oswald's thinking that day? I haven't heard any such definitive statement on his thinking such as your "There is no way ... " comment.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version