JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion & Debate > JFK Assassination Plus General Discussion And Debate

Oswald put his package straight into Frazier's car, why?

<< < (34/37) > >>

Jack Trojan:

--- Quote from: Steve Howsley on June 16, 2018, 02:43:01 AM ---How about he wiped his prints? Ever considered that?
--- End quote ---

Oswald assassinates the POTUS, then takes the time to wipe his prints from the rifle, ditches it, then races down 4 floors and into the lunch room in 90 seconds? HAHAHAHA!!!


--- Quote ---The bag is only "suspicious" in hindsight.

--- End quote ---

The bag was used to sheep-dip the patsy and link him to the crime.


--- Quote ---There is no way he would have included a useless scope in the paper bag if he intended to use the iron sights instead.
Do you have some insight to Oswald's thinking that day? I haven't heard any such definitive statement on his thinking such as your "There is no way ... " comment.

--- End quote ---

I'm just using logic, which you LNers never seem to do. With LNers, it's all about denial, obfuscation and ad homs, which they somehow think advances their position. Fact is, the LNer position is untenable since they have no where to go when they run into a contradiction because it's all or nothing for a LNer. Either LHO was a lone nut or he wasn't. There is no in between. If only they allowed LHO to be part of a conspiracy then they could use logic to make their arguments instead of naively defending the WC and the LN narrative come hell or high water.

All it takes is 1 contradiction to sink the LN hypothesis, and there are dozens of them. The LNer response is to deny, obfuscate and/or insult, which is a losing debate strategy. And keep in mind, LNers are the fringe belief system here. Most of the world ascribes to a conspiracy and the vast majority are not CTs. It's just so damn obvious to those who apply logic and critical thinking.

Jerry Freeman:

--- Quote from: Steve Howsley on June 16, 2018, 02:43:01 AM --- 
How about he wiped his prints?   
The bag is only "suspicious" in hindsight.
--- End quote ---
So is a cleaning rag...did they find one? I didn't hear about it.

Steve Howsley:

--- Quote from: Jack Trojan on June 16, 2018, 04:48:54 AM ---Oswald assassinates the POTUS, then takes the time to wipe his prints from the rifle, ditches it, then races down 4 floors and into the lunch room in 90 seconds? HAHAHAHA!!!

Do you have trouble chewing gum and walking at the same time? Walking whilst wiping the stock and metal parts seems like a very easy task to me

The bag was used to sheep-dip the patsy and link him to the crime.

Yeah, sure it was

I'm just using logic

That's exactly what you're not doing but I understand that thinking logically might hurt your brain so it needs to be avoided

--- End quote ---

Jerry Freeman:

--- Quote from: Steve Howsley on June 16, 2018, 05:39:10 AM ---Walking whilst wiping the stock and metal parts seems like a very easy task to me.

--- End quote ---
Walking where? Downs the stairs?
Not in evidence that the shooter went on a merry little stroll. Again, where is the rifle cleaning cloth?
Something like that would have been found and placed in evidence.

Steve Howsley:

--- Quote from: Jerry Freeman on June 16, 2018, 05:49:02 AM ---Walking where? Downs the stairs?

Well he didn't head up to the roof.

Not in evidence that the shooter went on a merry little stroll.

It wasn't a merry little stroll. He'd have been spombleprofglidnoctobunsting in his pants.

Again, where is the rifle cleaning cloth?

He was wearing a tee shirt which can easily be used as a cleaning cloth even when still be worn. That would be simple, close to hand and reasonably effective.

Something like that would have been found and placed in evidence.

I suppose it was when his effects were bundled up but it would not have been labelled a rifle cleaning cloth     :D

--- End quote ---

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version