Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lame LN excuses  (Read 52050 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1771
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #288 on: April 21, 2022, 12:09:45 AM »
Advertisement
When did Otto say this? Surely he can't be serious?
Where does this latest theory go and what does is it supposed to prove?
It seems with every breath this conspiracy exponentially expands.

Btw Otto hasn't been doing this for very long so he still doesn't understand the basics.

JohnM

Agreed.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #288 on: April 21, 2022, 12:09:45 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #289 on: April 21, 2022, 12:19:01 AM »
What makes you think he did? Oh yeah, the Warren Commission said so.

Oswald initially told Fritz that he went to Beckley by bus and got his pistol.

Mr. BALL. What did he say?
Mr. FRITZ. He told me he went over and caught a bus and rode the bus to North Beckley near where he lived and went by home and changed clothes and got his pistol and went to the show. I asked him why he took his pistol and he said, "Well, you know about a pistol; I just carried it." Let's see if I asked him anything else right that minute. That is just about it.


After Oswald was caught out, he admitted catching a cab.

Mr. BALL. I don't want you to say he admitted the transfer. I want you to tell me what he said about the transfer.
Mr. FRITZ. He told he that was the transfer the busdriver had given him when he caught the bus to go home. But he had told me if you will remember in our previous conversation that he rode the bus or on North Beckley and had walked home but in the meantime, sometime had told me about him riding a cab.
So, when I asked him about a cab ride if he had ridden in a cab he said yes, he had, he told me wrong about the bus, he had rode a cab. He said the reason he changed, that he rode the bus for a short distance, and the crowd was so heavy and traffic was so bad that he got out and caught a cab, and I asked him some other questions about the cab and I asked him what happened there when he caught the cab and he said there was a lady trying to catch a cab and he told the busdriver, the busdriver told him to tell the lady to catch the cab behind him and he said he rode that cab over near his home, he rode home in a cab.


JohnM

Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3041
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #290 on: April 21, 2022, 12:23:08 AM »
This evidently went over your head even though Iacoletti also pointed out the best you had was as weak as evidence comes.

What are you on about?

Quote
And no, I haven't got any problem admitting an actual mistake.

Sure thing  ;)

Quote
I asked for the very best and you give me this mess?

So let's simplify and go straight to what you indicate is the very best and easily checkable detail:

Mr. Ball: He would watch television sometimes?
Mrs. Johnson: Yes,. sir watch television, with the other men renters...

So what did your check reveal?

There were eleven other occupants, all male.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #290 on: April 21, 2022, 12:23:08 AM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #291 on: April 21, 2022, 12:31:03 AM »
As soon as she says this she has introduced the eleven other occupants into the fantasy. Why would she introduce such an easily checkable detail? Why would she drag eleven other men into the conspiracy?

Don’t you find it kind of odd then that they didn’t check?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #292 on: April 21, 2022, 12:34:39 AM »
Oswald initially told Fritz that he went to Beckley by bus and got his pistol.

You don’t know what Oswald told Fritz. And anyway, I thought you considered Oswald a “liar”. Or is that only about the stuff you don’t already believe?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #292 on: April 21, 2022, 12:34:39 AM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3041
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #293 on: April 21, 2022, 12:35:52 AM »
Let's simplify further: How did you check if there were eleven other occupants, all male?

Mary Ferrell's website

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #294 on: April 21, 2022, 12:48:33 AM »
You don’t know what Oswald told Fritz. And anyway, I thought you considered Oswald a “liar”. Or is that only about the stuff you don’t already believe?

Quote
And anyway, I thought you considered Oswald a “liar”.

That's an awfully broad generalization, everyone's lies and that's why Jesus died for our sins.

I examine each statement in context of the overall picture.

For example Oswald lied every time the rifle was brought up;

The Backyard photo is fake.
Neeley Street is omitted when he gives his previous addresses.
Oswald denies owning a rifle.
Frazier describes Oswald putting the bag on the back seat.
Oswald tells Fritz he carried the bag on his lap.
Frazier says Oswald told him the bag contained curtain rods.
Oswald tells Fritz the bag contained his lunch

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #294 on: April 21, 2022, 12:48:33 AM »


Online Dan O'meara

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3041
Re: Lame LN excuses
« Reply #295 on: April 21, 2022, 12:48:51 AM »
Sounds familiar and it's huge!

Do you plan to reveal what you found?

Any time soon?

Do your own research.

Do you have evidence that there were no tenants at the rooming house?
If so, let's see it.
Remember, this is your fantasy. You're the one who has to justify it.
So let's have your evidence that Oswald was never at 1026 and we'll go from there.  Thumb1: