Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Bugliosi's Conclusion of No Conspiracy 11 of 32 who is more likely to be correct  (Read 441 times)

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 988



11. As we’ve seen in this book, at the time of the assassination and Ruby’s killing of Oswald, those who knew Oswald and Ruby well, including family members, rejected the likelihood or notion that either had acted in concert with others to carry out their respective deeds. Yet years later, thousands of conspiracy theorists, not one of whom knew or had ever met either Oswald or Ruby, are convinced Oswald (in those cases where they don’t go further and say he was just a patsy) and Ruby were members of a conspiracy. On this one point alone of familiarity with the subject, who is more likely to be correct—those who knew the two men or those who did not?
RHVB




JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 573
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


11. As we’ve seen in this book, at the time of the assassination and Ruby’s killing of Oswald, those who knew Oswald and Ruby well, including family members, rejected the likelihood or notion that either had acted in concert with others to carry out their respective deeds. Yet years later, thousands of conspiracy theorists, not one of whom knew or had ever met either Oswald or Ruby, are convinced Oswald (in those cases where they don’t go further and say he was just a patsy) and Ruby were members of a conspiracy. On this one point alone of familiarity with the subject, who is more likely to be correct—those who knew the two men or those who did not?
RHVB




JohnM

Wow, the king of BS is on a roll….

First of all, how well can anybody truly know another person to make such a determination with any degree of certainty? Just how many families have been completely taken by surprise by the violent actions of a person they deemed to be peaceful?

Secondly, the same people who claimed to know Oswald said he had a secretive nature. Once you make that determination you need to wonder how well you can truly know a man who according to you is secretive!

I would actually like to know who these people are who knew Oswald "well"....

For instance, did Ruth Paine know him well? She had met him in March 1963. She saw him again in late September 63 when she picked up Marina in New Orleans and after that she saw Oswald during a few visits to her house in October and November. Does anybody really believe that under those circumstances you can know anybody "well"?

Online Richard Rubio

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 127
I appreciate the balance.

Mr. Capasse is a very good debater from what I've seen. On this though, I think he erred in saying what he did.

It's a downer if one opens up page one and every thread is a conspiracy thread, really... and I'd think it would be vice-versa as well.

Thanks to Mr. Mytton for the postings. Jusy my humble opinion.

Online Michael Capasse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 270
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I appreciate the balance.

Mr. Capasse is a very good debater from what I've seen. On this though, I think he erred in saying what he did.

It's a downer if one opens up page one and every thread is a conspiracy thread, really... and I'd think it would be vice-versa as well.

Thanks to Mr. Mytton for the postings. Jusy my humble opinion.

Thank you Richard - I have no problem with a fair and balanced board of topics
But it becomes quite mundane when it's same topic posted here again and before that and before that
it can all be done in one thread to make room for other subjects LN & CT - and that is not Mytton's motive

It is a game of spite; nothing more
« Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 05:06:49 AM by Michael Capasse »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 988
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
you started this little tantrum 6/10 - and like a baby have added one for each time Caprio did:D
check the dates & times




Quote
you started this little tantrum 6/10

If you can't stand the heat get out of the kitchen, it's all powerful and irrefutable and this feeble response proves it.

Quote
and like a baby have added one for each time Caprio did

This is supposed to be a debate between Adults yet you persist with calling me a "baby" and you talk about throwing feces?, be honest, you're a government plant trying to make the CT's look like they're completely off their rocker?

Quote
check the dates & times

What's to check, I post then he posts.



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 988
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Thank you Richard - I have no problem with a fair and balanced board of topics
But it becomes quite mundane when it's same topic posted here again and before that and before that
it can all be done in one thread to make room for other subjects LN & CT - and that is not Mytton's motive

It is a game of spite; nothing more




Quote
Thank you Richard - I have no problem with a fair and balanced board of topics

Yeah sure you do and this unwarranted attack by you, on me, is also fair and balanced?
My threads have a start and end that goes to 32 and yet Caprio is well over 200 and you don't say boo, fair and balanced, my ass!

Quote
But it becomes quite mundane when it's same topic posted here again and before that and before that
it can all be done in one thread to make room for other subjects LN & CT - and that is not Mytton's motive

It is a game of spite; nothing more

You can't be serious, the topics in the Bugliosi threads are hardly ever discussed because you lot are intellectually dishonest and always stay in your own self serving safe zones. Time to wake up!



JohnM

Online Michael Capasse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 270
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login


What's to check, I post then he posts.


JohnM

 :D...and you are FoS
« Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 10:37:53 AM by Michael Capasse »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2038
I see one difference:  Caprio writes his own posts.  Mytton cuts and pastes Bugliosi.

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Paul Ernst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 564
  • Semper peratus semper idem
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I see one difference:  Caprio writes his own posts.  Mytton cuts and pastes Bugliosi.

John it is called science LOL!
:D

JFK Assassination Forum