Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Gary Mack and the about face !  (Read 41954 times)

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #40 on: July 17, 2018, 10:51:47 PM »
Advertisement


- Why do you pick that particular spot on the back?

- Why do you think you can line up two photos taken at different distances, angles, etc and get meaningful measurements?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #40 on: July 17, 2018, 10:51:47 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #41 on: July 17, 2018, 11:28:00 PM »
Notice how none of "Mytton"'s jumping dots correspond to the official head wound location.  None.




Well duh, they're your pathetic eyewitnesses, live with it!



JohnM
« Last Edit: July 17, 2018, 11:50:46 PM by John Mytton »

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #42 on: July 18, 2018, 12:11:44 AM »
Do you actually think that Thomas Robinson would have been wrong about what he had to do to make JFK presentable for his funeral . Robinson worked on those wounds to close them up as any mortician would do. So Thomas Robinson was wrong about what he saw along with the Parkland Hospital Drs. & Nurses who worked on JFK & the photographers who took pictures of the wounds before Dr. Humes added some wounds that nobody saw at Parkland . If Parkland had seen the HUMES WOUNDS ( throat gash ) , top of the head, side of the head but mysteriously miss this baseball size blowout in the BACK of the head (which is what Parkland saw) along with a frontal bullet hole in the throat which had a small incision ( not a gash ) for a tracheostomy then we would not be having this conversation . As Robinson said about the wounds ," That's what the Drs.  did ". Who orchestrated HUMES and the others to do what they did ??????????

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #42 on: July 18, 2018, 12:11:44 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #43 on: July 18, 2018, 12:21:45 AM »
Do you actually think that Thomas Robinson would have been wrong about what he had to do to make JFK presentable for his funeral . Robinson worked on those wounds to close them up as any mortician would do. So Thomas Robinson was wrong about what he saw along with the Parkland Hospital Drs. & Nurses who worked on JFK & the photographers who took pictures of the wounds before Dr. Humes added some wounds that nobody saw at Parkland . If Parkland had seen the HUMES WOUNDS ( throat gash ) , top of the head, side of the head but mysteriously miss this baseball size blowout in the BACK of the head (which is what Parkland saw) along with a frontal bullet hole in the throat which had a small incision ( not a gash ) for a tracheostomy then we would not be having this conversation . As Robinson said about the wounds ," That's what the Drs.  did ". Who orchestrated HUMES and the others to do what they did ??????????





Quote
Dr. Humes added some wounds that nobody saw at Parkland

When flesh is cut there is a huge difference between the results of a live and dead person and according to your witness Cyril Wecht would be instantly noticeable..

Btw the fatal flaw in your argument is why would they drop the ball in the final seconds and idiotically give the body to someone who wasn't clued in to your deception? Doh!



JohnM




Online Mitch Todd

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #44 on: July 18, 2018, 12:25:27 AM »
I suppose you could find a local Dallas mortician to mix up some plaster of paris
then stretch a piece of rubber over the gaping hole at the back of the President's head -- :D


                                                                                                                                      author Joe West notes

Thomas Robinson
Gawler's Funeral Home

testimony before the Assassination Records Review Board

Purdy: Could you tell how large the opening had been caused by the BULLETS?

Robinson: Not really, well, I guess I can because a good bit of the bone had been blown away.
There was nothing there to piece together, so I would probably say about (the size of) a small orange.

Purdy: Could you give us an estimate of inches and the nature of the shape?
Robinson: Three.

Purdy: And the shape?
Robinson: Circular.

Purdy: Was it fairly smooth or fairly ragged?
Robinson: Ragged.

Purdy: Approximately where was this wound located?
Robinson: Directly behind the back of the head.
(ARRB, MD-63, pp. 1-2)

Not to be a pest or anything, but Andy Purdy worked for the HSCA, not the ARRB.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #44 on: July 18, 2018, 12:25:27 AM »


Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #45 on: July 18, 2018, 02:52:36 PM »
Is this the Robinson that was present and when Kennedy's body was turned over saw no other wounds below the back of the head?
That Robinson?
Oh he's credible.
 :-\

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2621
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #46 on: July 18, 2018, 03:02:45 PM »
Is this the Robinson that was present and when Kennedy's body was turned over saw no other wounds below the back of the head?
That Robinson?
Oh he's credible.
 :-\

          If you have a "quote" from Tom Robinson to present as evidence, please provide the "quote" and the source from which it was obtained. What you have posted above is nothing more than a question.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #46 on: July 18, 2018, 03:02:45 PM »


Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Gary Mack and the about face !
« Reply #47 on: July 18, 2018, 06:47:28 PM »
          If you have a "quote" from Tom Robinson to present as evidence, please provide the "quote" and the source from which it was obtained. What you have posted above is nothing more than a question.

You want me to do your work?
I'm retired.
Find it yourself.