Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: More Fake Pictures of Oswald  (Read 29907 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #88 on: August 15, 2018, 05:59:57 PM »
Advertisement
There is no better demonstration of the complete bankruptcy of the "Oswald is innocent' position than that its proponents have to lie, cherry pick, misrepresent, and misinterpret the evidence in a pathetic attempt to make their idiotic arguments.

How cute:  "I know you are but what am I?"

When did I ever make the claim that Oswald is innocent?  Your inability to show that he was guilty (even by lying about the evidence) is your problem, not mine.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #88 on: August 15, 2018, 05:59:57 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #89 on: August 15, 2018, 06:16:29 PM »
So that's what you fell into headfirst. OK.

Did you create the reverse image for that photo? If not where did you find it?
How many times did you have to edit that one? :-\
Just lift the rabbits tail ...it was there all the time.

Online Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #90 on: August 15, 2018, 10:01:40 PM »
How many times did you have to edit that one? :-\
Just lift the rabbits tail ...it was there all the time.

So should I put you down as someone knowingly trying to pass off fake photos as evidence or someone sucked in by a cheap transparent con? It's one or the other.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #90 on: August 15, 2018, 10:01:40 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #91 on: August 16, 2018, 12:33:56 AM »
....  pass off fake photos.. 
So you do admit that they are fakes Thumb1: I've been trying to show that all this time.
 
 

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #92 on: August 16, 2018, 12:45:28 AM »
So you do admit that they are fakes Thumb1: I've been trying to show that all this time.

You were caught posting a comparison that even a trained monkey could see was just a flipped image and you couldn't even tell the difference. Hilarious

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #92 on: August 16, 2018, 12:45:28 AM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #93 on: August 16, 2018, 01:53:49 AM »
.... even a trained monkey could see  ....
So you admit you are just another trained monkey Thumb1:
I know of course that the pictures are reversed ..that they are fake and BTW that Rodney Dangerfield had passed away. You seem to be just pulling your hair out sometimes ::) Ha Ha

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #94 on: August 16, 2018, 02:56:40 AM »
I know of course that the pictures are reversed ..that they are fake

Stop the BS, you didn't have a clue.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #94 on: August 16, 2018, 02:56:40 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: More Fake Pictures of Oswald
« Reply #95 on: August 16, 2018, 03:11:59 AM »
How cute:  "I know you are but what am I?"

When did I ever make the claim that Oswald is innocent?  Your inability to show that he was guilty (even by lying about the evidence) is your problem, not mine.

'lying'*

Says the guy who claimed Oswald's kids were too old to need a babysitter (and thereby falsely attaching a sinister motive to Ruth's presence)

And are you declaring this forum a court of law, barrister? It's seems more a forum of public opinion.

As I've said many times before, I've never said I could prove anything here. I've never gotten any further than 'probably'... just the same as the WC's 'probably' and the HSCA's 'likely'... despite your insistence that those bodies somehow had to prove Oswald guilty.

*According to your interpretation of the evidence, or the actual evidence? You, who tells us what witnesses really saw, or didn't see. We are not impressed.
« Last Edit: August 16, 2018, 03:25:50 AM by Bill Chapman »