Z Film & Other Evidence Makes Conspiracy VERY CLEAR

[John Kozlowski]

    You agree the image we are seeing between the sprocket holes was Not added to the Z Film after the assassination. Then what are we seeing? There is nothing remotely close to this on the Bell Film.  The images between the sprocket holes on the Bell Film are 11/22/63 Reality.  If what we are seeing between the sprocket holes on the Current Zapruder Film are Not showing us reality inside Dealey Plaza on 11/22/63, what does this possibly say about other images reproduced on that same film?

I'm not sure what  it is to be honest . I just don't believe anything he puts out. I'd like to see his work independently verified.

[John Kozlowski]

This video here shows the image of the supposed shooter pretty clear and he doesn't seem to move at all. I don't see the shooter moving to fire or a muzzle flash. Same position all the way to the underpass when the video cuts off

[Royell Storing]

This video here shows the image of the supposed shooter pretty clear and he doesn't seem to move at all. I don't see the shooter moving to fire or a muzzle flash.

       If you think the image between the sprocket holes is contrived, and the image was visible on the Z Film long Before Blevins got involved in the JFK Assassination, what does this tell you about the bona fides of the Z Film?

[John Kozlowski]

I think there was alot of work done to the z film before it was shown by Geraldo and I believe Richard DellaRosa about him seeing an unedited version of the film.

[John Kozlowski]

Yeah...I pointed that one out back on page 2.
We know that isn't the reflection and there was no shooter by it anyway.

 
Posted by: Royell Storing
? on: Today at 04:54:27 PM ? No the image is not photo shopped but at 5:00 in his film the image 'turns and fires' and who sees this in the actual slow motion version?
It's a photo shopped fraud.......
And so is the guy in the window ...photo trickery!!
Also, that someone can see a car from the 6th floor at that angle? Laughable.

 

I agree with you 100%. Ive watched the z film close to 100 times today and I cannot see the man move into position and fire one bit.

[Mitch Todd]

I agree with you 100%. Ive watched the z film close to 100 times today and I cannot see the man move into position and fire one bit.

Blevins' "rifleman"  is in the same spot in each frame on most frames in the Z film. And it doesn't change. It's an artifact caused by a piece of gunk in Zapruder's camera.

[John Kozlowski]

Blevins' "rifleman"  is in the same spot in each frame on most frames in the Z film. And it doesn't change. It's an artifact caused by a piece of gunk in Zapruder's camera.

I might go as far as to say maybe someone was watching from the roof, MAYBE a lookout.  But I'm leaning more towards your explanation. Whatever it is it's not a shooter.