Up close shot to Tippit's head and no spatter detected on shoes or pants?

Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Up close shot to Tippit's head and no spatter detected on shoes or pants?  (Read 88043 times)

Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Because of the  autopsy was so poorly conducted.

The reason why no bullet was found was because it blew the back of the President's head off.
It seems it was never recovered.

 Tippet was shot by a revolver...JFK by a high powered rifle. that's the reason for the difference.

Ray we are starting off on a different direction from this thread. But you are wrong. The back of the president's head was not blown off. The Zapruder film clearly shows the right side of the president's head blow out. I'll just ask ahead of time because I know you will come back and say the film was altered. Zapruder had three copies made, he gave one to the FBI and one to the Secret Service and he sold one to Life Magazine. So, when, where, how and by whom were all 3 films altered? Zapruder never said his film was altered. 

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178
Ray we are starting off on a different direction from this thread. But you are wrong. The back of the president's head was not blown off. The Zapruder film clearly shows the right side of the president's head blow out. I'll just ask ahead of time because I know you will come back and say the film was altered. Zapruder had three copies made, he gave one to the FBI and one to the Secret Service and he sold one to Life Magazine. So, when, where, how and by whom were all 3 films altered? Zapruder never said his film was altered.

Tom Robinson was part of the funeral home team who prepared JFK's body for burial. He worked on Kennedy's head for several hours and he saw the wound up close and placed it clearly at the back of the head. There is a video interview with him on YouTube where he shows the exact location of the wound.

Could it be this guy worked on a wound that really wasn't there? What do you think?

Offline Wesley Johnson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
Tom Robinson was part of the funeral home team who prepared JFK's body for burial. He worked on Kennedy's head for several hours and he saw the wound up close and placed it clearly at the back of the head. There is a video interview with him on YouTube where he shows the exact location of the wound.

Could it be this guy worked on a wound that really wasn't there? What do you think?


Okay Martin, first do you believe the Zapruder film was altered? Because if you do then I ask you to explain by saying, When, where, how and by whom, altered it. Now as to the head wound. I would believe Dr. Marion "Pepper" Jenkins, and Dr. Kemp Clark, and Dr. Humes, and the autopsy team, over a funeral home guy that was looking for his 15 minutes of fame. Dr. Jenkins was the anesthesiologist that was right at the president's head. I think I will believe him over Robinson any day. 

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2029
Tom Robinson was part of the funeral home team who prepared JFK's body for burial. He worked on Kennedy's head for several hours and he saw the wound up close and placed it clearly at the back of the head. There is a video interview with him on YouTube where he shows the exact location of the wound.

Could it be this guy worked on a wound that really wasn't there? What do you think?

Did Robinson work on the skull?  Are you sure about that?

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8178

Okay Martin, first do you believe the Zapruder film was altered? Because if you do then I ask you to explain by saying, When, where, how and by whom, altered it. Now as to the head wound. I would believe Dr. Marion "Pepper" Jenkins, and Dr. Kemp Clark, and Dr. Humes, and the autopsy team, over a funeral home guy that was looking for his 15 minutes of fame. Dr. Jenkins was the anesthesiologist that was right at the president's head. I think I will believe him over Robinson any day.

All I see is all sorts of questions, but no answer to my very simple question, except for "he's a liar". Why is that?

over a funeral home guy that was looking for his 15 minutes of fame.

What guy would that be? Certainly not Robinson, because he refused to give interviews and stayed well clear of publicity for most of his life. The video I talked about earlier was one of the rare occassions that he talked about it.

I think I will believe him over Robinson any day.

Sure you do... no surprise there.

Just add him to the long list of people (who had nothing to gain and gained nothing from telling his story) who you don't want to believe because what he says doesn't fit with your pre-determined conclusion. You haven't seen the video (for Dutch TV btw) and you don't know the first thing about Robinson, yet you instantly have a baseless negative opinion about him.

The problem is that Robinson isn't the only person who was in the autopsy room and saw the wound at the back of the head. But they are all liars looking for 15 minutes of fame as well, right?
« Last Edit: March 12, 2018, 10:40:03 PM by Martin Weidmann »

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2029
The problem is that Robinson isn't the only person who was in the autopsy room and saw the wound at the back of the head. But they are all liars looking for 15 minutes of fame as well, right?

I realize your above comments were directed at Wesley Johnson, but me personally, I am not calling Robinson a liar as much as I am calling you wrong.  Cite for your claim that Robinson "worked on the head for several hours".

Online John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5120
All I see is all sorts of questions, but no answer to my very simple question, except for "he's a liar". Why is that?

over a funeral home guy that was looking for his 15 minutes of fame.

What guy would that be? Certainly not Robinson, because he refused to give interviews and stayed well clear of publicity for most of his life. The video I talked about earlier was one of the rare occassions that he talked about it.

I think I will believe him over Robinson any day.

Sure you do... no surprise there.

Just add him to the long list of people (who had nothing to gain and gained nothing from telling his story) who you don't want to believe because what he says doesn't fit with your pre-determined conclusion. You haven't seen the video (for Dutch TV btw) and you don't know the first thing about Robinson, yet you instantly have a baseless negative opinion about him.

The problem is that Robinson isn't the only person who was in the autopsy room and saw the wound at the back of the head. But they are all liars looking for 15 minutes of fame as well, right?



It only happened one way.







JohnM