Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"

[Michael Chambers]

1, Oswald went home on a Thursday, instead of his usual Friday ride with BWF. There could be ONE and ONLY ONE reason for this: Oswald needed to get his rifle from the Paines garage 


2, Oswald left $170 and his ring for Marina and HIS CHILDREN, after the bad news she wanted a divorce. There could be ONE and ONLY ONE reason for this: Oswald was going to shoot JFK   

3.A light was left on the in Paines garage. There is ONE and ONLY one reason for this: Oswald went into the garage to get his rifle and left the light on.


Soon the Bugliiosi mole hill of "evidence" will grow even larger into a MOUNTAIN of 

2, Oswald left $170 and his ring for Marina and HIS CHILDREN, after the bad news she wanted a divorce. There could be ONE and ONLY ONE reason for this: Oswald was going to shoot JFK   



Oswald did this to throw suspicion away from Marina who is obviously involved to the eyeteeth.

As in if what he believed was his theatre rendezvous for his next step out of town and away with the cash had happened.

[Michael Walton]

Michael, If you believe that the government got it right with its report in 1978 , why do you argue against it?

Wow, Tim.  You left this out:

The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy.

[Bill Brown]

Uhh, yes it does Bill. I have another video showing someone taking a shot to the front of their head and their head is blown backwards like Kennedy's.  We simply do not know how any gunshot wound to the head is going to cause movement to it but there is visual evidence that it can happen.

And as for the HSCA, you can make all the excuses you want to but they did say there were shots from the front.  That's a  conclusion written by a government body, the same type of body as the Warren report was.  And don't forget Bill, THEY didn't know what the hell to say either except for one thing - that it was going to be all Oswald, all of the time.  They had a preordained conclusion from on up high. So they massaged the photographic and other evidence to reach that conclusion. Seriously, Bill, do you know how many witnesses alone that were not even interviewed for the Warren report? One that a simple massage of what they said would be too obvious to be dishonest?

If you ask me, the HSCA, despite all of their own faults, were a little more interested in the real truth of what happened than the Warren gang ever was.

And as for the HSCA, you can make all the excuses you want to but they did say there were shots from the front.

Did the HSCA really say there were shots (plural) from the front, or are you misquoting their findings?

Secondly, they concluded, unlike yourself (even though you are relying on them as if they're confirming your belief) that the shot from the right-front was a miss.

And don't forget Bill, THEY didn't know what the hell to say either except for one thing - that it was going to be all Oswald, all of the time.  They had a preordained conclusion from on up high.

Sorry Michael, but I'm not interested in your opinion on that... and make no mistake, it is merely your opinion.

[Richard Rubio]

HSCA stated that one shot must have come from the knoll area, it didn't hit anything.

The Committee further concluded that it was probable that:

    four shots were fired
    the fourth shot came from a second assassin located on the grassy knoll, but missed. The HSCA concluded the existence and location of this alleged fourth shot based on the later discredited Dallas Police Department Dictabelt recording analysis.[20]


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_House_Select_Committee_on_Assassinations

Would a grassy knoll shot be sort of from the side? That's what it seems like to me.

[Mike Orr]

Ross , you are right about the  Warren Report ( Main report that he handed LBJ ) having an index but I don't think the 26 volumes of testimonies and diagrams and pictures has an index. If you find out about the 26 volumes of the Warren Commission Report having an index , I would appreciate it if you let me know. Thanks Ross

[Bill Brown]

So you do NOT support the WC's claim afterall. Good to know. They may revoke your LNer card though.

What "WC claim" are you referring to?

[John Mytton]

2. Not only is there no credible evidence that organized crime, the CIA, Castro, LBJ, and so on, conspired with Oswald to murder the president, but such a plan would be incredibly reckless, irrational, and dangerous for any of these persons or groups to even entertain, and hence, unlikely and far-fetched
RHVB



JohnM

[Mitch Todd]

[...]
And as for the HSCA, you can make all the excuses you want to but they did say there were shots from the front. 

The HSCA said that there was ONE shot from the front, and that it missed. And that was based on a novel scientific approach that was later shown to be untenable, given the data.