Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"  (Read 49920 times)

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4993
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #352 on: July 23, 2018, 04:51:58 PM »
Advertisement
So John, you are:

- a fence sitter?

- a contrarian?

I would suggest lazy, closet CTer.  The laziest position for a CTer is to suggest they are not a CTer at all but are merely taking issue with the evidence against Oswald which they then universally attribute as the product of fakery and intentional lies.  What the rest of us would consider a conspiracy position but without having to provide any explanation or evidence to support these baseless fantasies.  Like Inspector Clouseau, John apparently suspects everyone and no one to maintain his circle of lunacy.   

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #352 on: July 23, 2018, 04:51:58 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #353 on: July 23, 2018, 05:48:53 PM »
"Reclaiming History":  An exercise in arrogant verbosity and logical fallacies.


After over forty years of the most prodigiously intensive investigation and examination of a murder case in world history, certain powerful facts exist which cannot be challenged:

Of course your "facts" can be challenged, Vince.

Quote
Not one weapon other than Oswald?s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle has ever been found and linked in any way to the assassination.

"Oswald?s Mannlicher-Carcano rifle".  LOL.

Quote
Not one bullet other than the three fired from Oswald?s rifle has ever been found and linked to the assassination.

Not one bullet from ANY rifle has ever been found and linked to the assassination.

Quote
No person other than Oswald has ever been connected by evidence, in any way, to the assassination.

Other than Roscoe White, E. Howard Hunt, David Ferrie, Clay Shaw, James Files, Sam Giancana, Carlos Marcello, Santos Trafficante, Joseph Milteer, Gerry Hemming, Loran Hall, William Seymour, Lawrence Howard . . .

It's Bugliosi and his shameless sycophants who are engaging in "wild speculation, theorizing, and shameless dissembling about the facts of the case" and have been doing so since November 22, 1963.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #354 on: July 23, 2018, 06:25:35 PM »
I would suggest lazy, closet CTer.  The laziest position for a CTer is to suggest they are not a CTer at all but are merely taking issue with the evidence against Oswald which they then universally attribute as the product of fakery and intentional lies.  What the rest of us would consider a conspiracy position but without having to provide any explanation or evidence to support these baseless fantasies.  Like Inspector Clouseau, John apparently suspects everyone and no one to maintain his circle of lunacy.

Says the guy who has never provided a single scrap of evidence to support his baseless fantasy.  Just a repetitive litany of baseless claims about the evidence.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #354 on: July 23, 2018, 06:25:35 PM »


Offline Jerry Freeman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3725
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #355 on: July 30, 2018, 04:25:42 AM »
It was a political assassination.
Would it be said that the USA was just another Banana Republic?
So it was covered up from the top down.