Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro  (Read 1791 times)

Offline Steve Howsley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2018, 11:42:06 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

If you don't care about my statements, don't respond.

I believe there is a ignore button, use it.

It'd be better if you would simply support your statements.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2018, 11:42:06 PM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 393
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #21 on: June 10, 2018, 11:44:22 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It'd be better if you would simply support your statements.

Point out what I didn't support.


Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 393
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #22 on: June 10, 2018, 11:46:08 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've read it cover to cover twice. I've tried to read Harvey & Lee several times but I burst into laughter by about the third page and have to put it aside.

I don't believe you.


Offline Ross Lidell

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 79
  • JFK : Profile In Courage
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2018, 11:48:12 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
   Vincent Bugliosi's conclusion of no conspiracy should make you want to look at the JFK Assassination and dig in to the case . Reclaiming History and the Warren Report should be both in the Fiction section of the library. Now Dr. Cyril Wecht already told us that the Warren Report should be in the Fiction area of the Library and I think it is safe to say that Reclaiming History belongs in the fiction area also. I don't think there is one page in Vincent's book that does not refer to some disclaimer of conspiracy. I have the book & I have to make myself go back and pick up where I left off and read some more and then just set it down because it's a broken record . Have any of you tried to read this book? It's a mile long just like the Warren "26 volume" Report that Dr. Wecht says does not have an index.

The "Warren Report" does have an Index.

"The Report of the President's Commission On The Assassination Of President Kennedy" became known as "The Warren Report".

There is a "Table Of Contents".

Here is the link:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The "Index" is on Pages 880 thru 888.

Dr Wecht is wrong and so are you.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2018, 11:49:59 PM by Ross Lidell »

Online Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1972
  • You only receive flak when you are over the target
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2018, 12:11:03 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
After 55 years still no credible replacement for Dirty Harvey as prime suspect. What, too soon?

After 54 years there still is no supporting evidence for the WC claim that LHO assassinated JFK and shot JDT. Pathetic.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2018, 12:11:03 AM »


Online Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1972
  • You only receive flak when you are over the target
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #25 on: June 11, 2018, 12:16:38 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Again, a shot from the right-front does not throw the head and body violently back and to the left.

But apparently according to Brown a shot from the right-rear does. 🤣

Offline Steve Howsley

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #26 on: June 11, 2018, 12:31:59 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I don't believe you.

What, that I burst out laughing when trying to read H&L.   :D

I have actually read RH twice but preceded that with a reading of Four Days In November which is the first section of RH up to the funerals on the Monday. It was that reading that caused me to purchase RH online. I haven't read all of the source notes on the CD though but I dip into it at random occasionally and at times when searching for a name or other reference and that too is an excellent read.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1152
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #27 on: June 11, 2018, 12:59:52 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A government committee hand-picked by LBJ got it wrong in 1964.

A government committee got it right in 1978.

I. FINDINGS OF THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON ASSASSINATIONS IN THE ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY IN DALLAS, TEX., NOVEMBER 22, 1963

ĽA. Lee Harvey Oswald fired three shots at President John F. Kennedy. The second and third shots he fired struck the President. The third shot he fired killed the President.
  • 1.President Kennedy was struck by two rifle shots fired from behind him.
    2.The shots that struck President Kennedy from behind him were fired from the sixth floor window of the southeast corner of the Texas School Book Depository building.
    3.Lee Harvey Oswald owned the rifle. that was used to fire the shots from the sixth floor window of the southeast comer of the Texas School Book Depository building.
    4.Lee Harvey Oswald, shortly before the assassination, had access to and was present on the sixth floor of the Texas School Book Depository building.
    5.Lee Harvey Oswald's other actions tend to support the conclusion that he assassinated President Kennedy.


Michael, If you believe that the government got it right with its report in 1978 , why do you argue against it?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #27 on: June 11, 2018, 12:59:52 AM »


Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #28 on: June 11, 2018, 03:30:20 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
"I choose to believe". That say's it all.

 Forming conclusions is not a deliberate process?

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 802
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #29 on: June 11, 2018, 03:32:34 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Again, a shot from the right-front does not throw the head and body violently back and to the left.



 What does it do?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #29 on: June 11, 2018, 03:32:34 AM »