Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"  (Read 17770 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 781
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2018, 11:20:57 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A bullet striking a head moving forward at approximately 11mph, (the speed of the limo), would/could stop

forward movement and create the appearance of being thrown backward. Add in the back brace that held

JFK upright after the throat wound and the probability of a shot from the right front buries the idea a LN

fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD.

Nobody cares about your opinion.

Support your statements.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #20 on: June 10, 2018, 11:20:57 PM »


Online Ross Lidell

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • JFK : Profile In Courage
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #21 on: June 10, 2018, 11:24:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.

"I choose to believe". That say's it all.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #22 on: June 10, 2018, 11:25:32 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Nobody cares about your opinion.

Support your statements.


If you don't care about my statements, don't respond.

I believe there is a ignore button, use it.

Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #23 on: June 10, 2018, 11:28:10 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Anybody know about whether anyone has challenged Bugloisi to a debate other than Wecht?

You might want to change that to the past tense 'had challenged' as VB died three years ago.

Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2018, 11:31:17 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
   Vincent Bugliosi's conclusion of no conspiracy should make you want to look at the JFK Assassination and dig in to the case . Reclaiming History and the Warren Report should be both in the Fiction section of the library. Now Dr. Cyril Wecht already told us that the Warren Report should be in the Fiction area of the Library and I think it is safe to say that Reclaiming History belongs in the fiction area also. I don't think there is one page in Vincent's book that does not refer to some disclaimer of conspiracy. I have the book & I have to make myself go back and pick up where I left off and read some more and then just set it down because it's a broken record . Have any of you tried to read this book? It's a mile long just like the Warren "26 volume" Report that Dr. Wecht says does not have an index.

I've read it cover to cover twice. I've tried to read Harvey & Lee several times but I burst into laughter by about the third page and have to put it aside.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #24 on: June 10, 2018, 11:31:17 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1070
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #25 on: June 10, 2018, 11:41:16 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.

What you mean 'we', Sherlock? There's plenty of research describing what happens when a bullet strikes a head or body. It's called science. Of course you self-appointed experts don't need to do any research... just look at all those movies showing people flying all over the place from shots... pick up a book FFS.

Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 297
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #26 on: June 10, 2018, 11:42:06 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

If you don't care about my statements, don't respond.

I believe there is a ignore button, use it.

It'd be better if you would simply support your statements.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #27 on: June 10, 2018, 11:44:22 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It'd be better if you would simply support your statements.

Point out what I didn't support.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #27 on: June 10, 2018, 11:44:22 PM »


Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 382
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #28 on: June 10, 2018, 11:46:08 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
I've read it cover to cover twice. I've tried to read Harvey & Lee several times but I burst into laughter by about the third page and have to put it aside.

I don't believe you.


Online Ross Lidell

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 99
  • JFK : Profile In Courage
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #29 on: June 10, 2018, 11:48:12 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
   Vincent Bugliosi's conclusion of no conspiracy should make you want to look at the JFK Assassination and dig in to the case . Reclaiming History and the Warren Report should be both in the Fiction section of the library. Now Dr. Cyril Wecht already told us that the Warren Report should be in the Fiction area of the Library and I think it is safe to say that Reclaiming History belongs in the fiction area also. I don't think there is one page in Vincent's book that does not refer to some disclaimer of conspiracy. I have the book & I have to make myself go back and pick up where I left off and read some more and then just set it down because it's a broken record . Have any of you tried to read this book? It's a mile long just like the Warren "26 volume" Report that Dr. Wecht says does not have an index.

The "Warren Report" does have an Index.

"The Report of the President's Commission On The Assassination Of President Kennedy" became known as "The Warren Report".

There is a "Table Of Contents".

Here is the link:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

The "Index" is on Pages 880 thru 888.

Dr Wecht is wrong and so are you.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2018, 11:49:59 PM by Ross Lidell »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy"
« Reply #29 on: June 10, 2018, 11:48:12 PM »