Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro  (Read 1313 times)

Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 830
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2018, 09:24:59 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Go by your own eyes please.  I have an extremely graphic video that I could share with you on here that shows two men, taking a high-powered bullet to the back of the head and NEITHER of them are slinged backward. Taking away all of the scientific mumbo-jumbo (jet effect, acoustics, etc.) this is more than enough proof - at least for me - to me that someone taking a shot from the rear does not suddenly be slinged backward.  It doesn't make sense and if you're honest with yourself after seeing it, it should put doubt into even the most rabid LNer.

I would post it for educational purposes only here but I do not know if the admins would allow it and I don't know who to ask. When I posted it many months ago on EF, some people were shocked but nothing was reported.  Then months later a member there, Stancak, got xxxxxx because I kept rebutting his stupid PM long-leg theory. When he came across the video, he suddenly became ultra-sensitive ("oh my goodness") and reported it.  Then, irony of ironies, he posts Kennedy's graphic autopsy photos.

If you want to see for yourself, email me.

A bullet striking the head from the right-front would not throw the body back and to the left.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #10 on: June 10, 2018, 09:24:59 PM »


Offline Michael Walton

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #11 on: June 10, 2018, 09:31:09 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Please explain what conspiracy the "'78 conclusion" uncovered.

It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.


Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 830
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #12 on: June 10, 2018, 10:01:52 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.

Again, a shot from the right-front does not throw the head and body violently back and to the left.


The link you provided stated the following...

"The committee believes, on the basis of the evidence available to it, that President John F. Kennedy was probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy. The committee is unable to identify the other gunman or the extent of the conspiracy."

The HSCA had no idea what sort of conspiracy existed, if any at all.

This doesn't even mention their faulty conclusion based on the supposed rifle fire caught on the dictabelt recording, even though the impulses were recorded once the motorcade was on it's way to Parkland Hospital.

You wish to claim that the HSCA "got it right", yet you claim, based on your opinion on the way the body went back and to the left, that the President was struck by a shot from the knoll.  The HSCA stated that the President was struck twice, both from behind and both from above.  it sounds like you're contradicting yourself.
« Last Edit: June 10, 2018, 10:05:09 PM by Bill Brown »

Online Mitch Todd

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #13 on: June 10, 2018, 10:42:30 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Go by your own eyes please.  I have an extremely graphic video that I could share with you on here that shows two men, taking a high-powered bullet to the back of the head and NEITHER of them are slinged backward. Taking away all of the scientific mumbo-jumbo (jet effect, acoustics, etc.) this is more than enough proof - at least for me - to me that someone taking a shot from the rear does not suddenly be slinged backward.  It doesn't make sense and if you're honest with yourself after seeing it, it should put doubt into even the most rabid LNer.

I would post it for educational purposes only here but I do not know if the admins would allow it and I don't know who to ask. When I posted it many months ago on EF, some people were shocked but nothing was reported.  Then months later a member there, Stancak, got xxxxxx because I kept rebutting his stupid PM long-leg theory. When he came across the video, he suddenly became ultra-sensitive ("oh my goodness") and reported it.  Then, irony of ironies, he posts Kennedy's graphic autopsy photos.

If you want to see for yourself, email me.

It all pretty much ended right here: "Taking away all of the scientific mumbo-jumbo."  Because who needs all that pesky physics and physiology, anyway? We don't need that! We have a video from the internet! All one of it! Because nothing proves impossibility like a single data point.

And yes, I'm channeling the inner sarcast from deep within my soul. A great, dark hairy beast with sharp claws, big teeth, and the Helen Reddy Boxed Set.

 


Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2018, 11:00:49 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A bullet striking the head from the right-front would not throw the body back and to the left.

A bullet striking a head moving forward at approximately 11mph, (the speed of the limo), would/could stop

forward movement and create the appearance of being thrown backward. Add in the back brace that held

JFK upright after the throat wound and the probability of a shot from the right front buries the idea a LN

fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #14 on: June 10, 2018, 11:00:49 PM »


Online Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 830
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #15 on: June 10, 2018, 11:20:57 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
A bullet striking a head moving forward at approximately 11mph, (the speed of the limo), would/could stop

forward movement and create the appearance of being thrown backward. Add in the back brace that held

JFK upright after the throat wound and the probability of a shot from the right front buries the idea a LN

fired from the 6th floor SE corner TSBD.

Nobody cares about your opinion.

Support your statements.

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
  • JFK : Profile In Courage
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #16 on: June 10, 2018, 11:24:39 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.

"I choose to believe". That say's it all.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 369
  • The human mind is our fundamental resource. JFK
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2018, 11:25:32 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Nobody cares about your opinion.

Support your statements.


If you don't care about my statements, don't respond.

I believe there is a ignore button, use it.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #17 on: June 10, 2018, 11:25:32 PM »


Online Steve Howsley

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 64
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #18 on: June 10, 2018, 11:31:17 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
   Vincent Bugliosi's conclusion of no conspiracy should make you want to look at the JFK Assassination and dig in to the case . Reclaiming History and the Warren Report should be both in the Fiction section of the library. Now Dr. Cyril Wecht already told us that the Warren Report should be in the Fiction area of the Library and I think it is safe to say that Reclaiming History belongs in the fiction area also. I don't think there is one page in Vincent's book that does not refer to some disclaimer of conspiracy. I have the book & I have to make myself go back and pick up where I left off and read some more and then just set it down because it's a broken record . Have any of you tried to read this book? It's a mile long just like the Warren "26 volume" Report that Dr. Wecht says does not have an index.

I've read it cover to cover twice. I've tried to read Harvey & Lee several times but I burst into laughter by about the third page and have to put it aside.

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #19 on: June 10, 2018, 11:41:16 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
It's in the link, Bill.

**********

We simply do not know how a body reacts to shots to the head, Bill. I choose to believe that a frontal shot pushed his head backward and people down on the street ran up to the knoll area.  They didn't do that because they were sight seeing. *Something* made them run up there.

What you mean 'we', Sherlock? There's plenty of research describing what happens when a bullet strikes a head or body. It's called science. Of course you self-appointed experts don't need to do any research... just look at all those movies showing people flying all over the place from shots... pick up a book FFS.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Bugliosi's "Conclusion of No Conspiracy" Intro
« Reply #19 on: June 10, 2018, 11:41:16 PM »