Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: 1+1+1=6  (Read 27333 times)

Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #72 on: June 14, 2018, 07:47:40 PM »
Advertisement
Perhaps you are competing with Howard Gee on the meaningless taunts category Since John I's seeming disappearance you are now the clear leader Congratulations

There you go sticking your nose in somebody else's posts. Quite a few of you new nuts don't have a grasp on the facts yet do you? YouTube is doing you harm. Reading is fundamental .

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #72 on: June 14, 2018, 07:47:40 PM »


Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #73 on: June 14, 2018, 07:51:57 PM »
There you go sticking your nose in somebody else's posts. Quite a few of you new nuts don't have a grasp on the facts yet do you? YouTube is doing you harm. Reading is fundamental .

 I am happy to ignore you Steve I even mentioned my regret earlier

Offline Stewart Hart

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #74 on: June 14, 2018, 09:11:49 PM »
No one who labels others as ?Drooling fools? is interested in intelligent, honest debate.
There is the interviews the day of the event
The FBI coercion interviews
The Warren commission printed testimony
The shock of many who testified that their testimony was changed
It is extremely difficult to determine the number of shots due to a evidence masking autopsy
There are many wild theories without evidence
The lack of evidence is intentional

Many disagree
Few resort to insults

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #74 on: June 14, 2018, 09:11:49 PM »


Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #75 on: June 14, 2018, 10:22:03 PM »
Why do you say three shots? Because the WC told you so. You weren't there so you have no way of knowing for sure, but you feel comfortable telling others that they are wrong as if you were.

If that's how you treat evidence i.e. you can only trust what your own senses tell you at the time of the incident then no one on this forum can contribute anything at all to the discussion as none of us was there in the plaza at 12.30pm on 11.22.63. Anyway, how many shots do you think were fired in DP that day?

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #76 on: June 14, 2018, 10:35:51 PM »
Whenever you misquote witness testimony you will be notified. Whenever you dodge and twist away from said misquote, you will be exposed as a mere buff.

I suggest you find a CT-only forum where you can backslap to your heart's content.

This is indeed very intimidating Bill Looks like i am going to shape up my act with new quote sheriff in town

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #76 on: June 14, 2018, 10:35:51 PM »


Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #77 on: June 14, 2018, 11:29:34 PM »
I wonder if you even know why the WC claimed that there were three shots.

Forensic evidence and witness statements. How many shots do you say were fired?

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #78 on: June 15, 2018, 12:35:45 AM »
Forensic evidence and witness statements. How many shots do you say were fired?


 We do know the number of shots fired is less than the number of times the LN'ers insist on a perfect accounting of how many shots were fired Conclusions have their place, but the premises they are based upon is primary

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #78 on: June 15, 2018, 12:35:45 AM »


Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: 1+1+1=6
« Reply #79 on: June 15, 2018, 12:45:08 AM »

 We do know the number of shots fired is less than the number of times the LN'ers insist on a perfect accounting of how many shots were fired Conclusions have their place, but the premises they are based upon is primary

What is meant by 'perfect accounting'? Do you mean three or four or some other number?

How many shots do you think were fired in DP on that day?