1+1+1=6

[Bill Brown]

Bill I would think you would have the common sense to be embarrassed by this thread

If you really wish to waste the time, go ahead and point out anything I stated which you feel I should be embarrassed about.

You guys confused a "flurry of shells" with a flurry of shots.  That is nothing for me to be embarrassed over.

[Rob Caprio]

Although it's impossible to pin the drooling kooks down on the number of shots fired during the assassination, the general consensus seems to be....

JFK hit a minimum of 4 times.

Once in the back from behind.
Once in the throat from in front.
Twice in the head from the back and front.


JBC probably hit twice.

Once in the back.
Once in the wrist.

Wait.

We're not done yet counting up the kook bullets.

We also have the missed shots that were found in the plaza grass and picked up by an FBI agent as well as the shot(s) that damaged the sidewalk or was it a manhole cover, or both ?

OK, let's forget about the missed shots.

We'll make this easier for the kooks.

How do you explain that the overwhelming majority of assassination witnesses reported hearing just 3 shots ?

Even in a plaza where echoes and reverberations would be expected to cause people to think they heard more shots than were actually fired, most people still only heard three shots.

Yes, I realize a tiny minority of people thought as many as 4 shots might have been fired, but the number of people hearing more than 4 is virtually non-existent.

So drooling kooks, here's your latest dilemma and challenge:
Can you decide how many shots were fired ?

And after you've finished straining your kooky brains counting higher than 3, explain why less than your consensus 6 shots were heard.

So far you've failed miserably to explain what happened to the bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat in 'The Truly Magical Bullet' thread, so here's another chance to redeem yourselves.

How many shots, droolers ?

DEBUNKING THE DROOLERS STEP BY STEP

Isn't "kook" a pejorative term? I would think so. Then he actually expects discussion after this?

[Rob Caprio]

That is an excellent point.

Only IF your goal is to mislead people.

[Rob Caprio]

Again you avoid the question. A day ago you asked:

Can you explain how a cranky old bolt action carcano could be fired so rapidly that the incoming shots sounded like "flurry of shots".....

and I responded:

You failed to mention anything at all about the action taking place in the limo (including the shattering/breaking of the skull) that contributed to the perception of a flurry of shots. I assume you acknowledge that that was an understandable thing for Kellerman to have thought. Do you?

Now, to the point of this thread; how many shots were fired in DP on 11.22.63? I say three and you say ... ?

With the sound of the rifle shot then bullet fragments pinging around in the car, JC crying out right behind Kellerman saying that they were all doomed, the sound of the skull getting hit and the spray of the brain matter plus Jackie's cries of horror and devastation makes for a horror beyond imagination. So I answered your question and have twice now asked two simple questions of my own. Are you not prepared to answer them?

Nonsense.

[Rob Caprio]

A question for you ZM; how many shots were fired in DP on 11.22.63? I say three and you say ... ?

Why do you say three shots? Because the WC told you so. You weren't there so you have no way of knowing for sure, but you feel comfortable telling others that they are wrong as if you were.

[Jerry Freeman]

Isn't "kook" a pejorative term? 

"Droolers" "Kooks" ....a limited vocabulary for a limited mind.

The parrots riding the Warren Report Express.....
                           

[Rob Caprio]

How do you know?

Kellerman never said a "flurry of shots".

Aah, what's this?

Mr. KELLERMAN. But after the flurry of shots, I recall her saying, "What are they doing to you?" Now again, of course, my comparison of the voice of her speech--certainly, I have heard it many times, and in the car there was conversation she was carrying on through shock, I am sure.

Are you being dishonest again?

[Rob Caprio]

My point was that Kellerman said a "flurry of shells" as opposed to a flurry of shots.  Big difference.

It would be IF he never said "flurry of shots", but he did a number of times. Look how desperate the LNers are. 🚣

[Rob Caprio]

Point out an error of mine and I'll admit I made an error.  Fair enough?

Kellerman never says a flurry of shots; he said a "flurry of shells".  I'm not going to bother pointing out the difference.

Aah, you said that Kellerman never said "flurry of shots". What's this?

Mr. KELLERMAN. But after the flurry of shots...

Will you admit your mistake?

[Rob Caprio]

So, the error was yours and not mine.

You wish. 😂