Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: The Truly Magical Bullet  (Read 15141 times)

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
The Truly Magical Bullet
« on: May 28, 2018, 04:58:54 AM »
The CKs absolutely love to insist that JFK's back wound and throat wound are unrelated. They insist that JFK's throat wound was an entrance wound.

Just one little problem for the Kooks: ask them what happened to the bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat from the front - and they get a glazed over look on their faces and sit there mouths agape, stuttering and drooling.

So here's the challenge, drooling Kooks - explain what happened to the bullet that you insist entered JFK's throat from the front.

Sorry, rehashing for the billionth time why you think CE399 wounding both JFK and the Governor is an impossibilty, or any other subterfuge or diversion to avoid explaining what happened to the bullet that you insist entered JFK's throat from the front isn't an acceptable response.

Time to man up, Kooks.

JFK Assassination Forum

The Truly Magical Bullet
« on: May 28, 2018, 04:58:54 AM »

Offline Jim Brunsman

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 50
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2018, 06:54:46 AM »
  Mr. Gee insults those who believe the throat wound is an entrance wound.  Why ignore the sworn testimony of the Parkland witnesses? Please state how you explain their consistent sworn testimony? It's a logical question to ask what happened to this bullet. I don't have an answer for you. Some believe the shot through the windshield caused this wound which makes sense except it appears the windshield isn't hit until later. There's the same problem from the other direction.  The bullet that entered JFK's back DID NOT EXIT according to the autopsy witnesses. Sorry, but logic dictates you are wrong in both directions! Yes, it CERTAINLY means that the boneheaded SBT is once again easily debunked. Those are only two of the most obvious reasons the SBT is nonsense. So let's spell it out, because not everyone understands these issues. If the back shot didn't exit, how could JBC be hit with this bullet?

Let's say for a second that the back wound DID penetrate JFK's body. From the alleged patsy's perch, there's a steep downward angle. That shot would not have exited anywhere near JFK's throat. The SBT was Arlen Specter's creation. It was based on extremely false reasoning when faced with the timing problem posed by the Zapruder film.He then had the audacity to challenge and threaten witnesses who testified contrary to his bogus SBT fantasy. It was an embarrassingly bad theory in 1964. It's even more silly now.

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2018, 05:43:10 PM »

To believe that both the back and the neck wounds on JFK were entrance wounds requires:

** the shooters to have used low velocity, low power weapons

Even through the z312 shot fragmented, as a result of hitting bone, the skull, at near muzzle velocity, the fragments had no problem going all the way through the skull. One fragment cracked the windshield, another dented the windshield frame while a third flew on another 80 yards and nicked Mr. Tague. It was able to do this because of the high speed (2150 f/s). A similar round would surely go all the way through JFK?s neck, leaving both an entrance and exit wound. JFK?s neck simply would not stop such a bullet, leaving only an entrance wound.



So, to believe that both wounds are entrance wounds, I would have to accept:

** The shooters elected to use a frontal shooter, even though this will tend to make it apparent there were multiple shooters.

** The shooters elected to use lower velocity weapons, even though these are inherently less accurate, particularly with a moving target.

** The shooters elected to use lower velocity weapons, even though these are inherently less lethal than a regular rifle.

** The shooters elected to use lower velocity weapons, even through they would inherently tend to make it appear Oswald was not the shooter, since they would not leave an exit wound.

** And, most fantastically of all, by sheer luck, a frontal shooter and a rear shooter, hit on opposite sides of the neck, allowing the wounds to be explained by a shot from the rear. What a fantastic lucky break for the conspirators.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2018, 05:43:10 PM »

Online Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 837
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2018, 07:33:08 PM »
 The possibility has been raised that the wound was from glass from the windshield hole

 I assume it is generally agreed the angle from the snipers nest would have been 17 degrees downward and almost  7 degrees to the left?
« Last Edit: May 28, 2018, 07:46:53 PM by Matt Grantham »

Online Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 545
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2018, 07:40:03 PM »
The CKs absolutely love to insist that JFK's back wound and throat wound are unrelated. They insist that JFK's throat wound was an entrance wound.

Just one little problem for the Kooks: ask them what happened to the bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat from the front - and they get a glazed over look on their faces and sit there mouths agape, stuttering and drooling.

So here's the challenge, drooling Kooks - explain what happened to the bullet that you insist entered JFK's throat from the front.

Sorry, rehashing for the billionth time why you think CE399 wounding both JFK and the Governor is an impossibilty, or any other subterfuge or diversion to avoid explaining what happened to the bullet that you insist entered JFK's throat from the front isn't an acceptable response.

Time to man up, Kooks.

Everyone, including the LNers know who the kook is here. It is not up to CTs to guess how the conspirators covered their tracks. It is up to dufuses like you to defend the WC with facts supporting the LNer narrative. Like the good little shill/sucker that you are.
« Last Edit: May 28, 2018, 07:41:53 PM by Jack Trojan »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2018, 07:40:03 PM »

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2018, 09:07:52 PM »
Just as I suspected, the drooling kooks are unable to answer the most basic and obvious question relating to their insistence that JFK was hit in the throat by a bullet fired from the front - where did this bullet go ?

Well, so far it's only been a day, so we'll have to give you glazed droolers some more time to come up with an even remotely plausible answer.

Perhaps 55 years will be enough time.

Just kidding Kooks, obviously nothing will deter you from insisting JFK was struck in the throat from the front even though you are completely baffled by the most obvious and mundane question relating to your absurd insistence.

Where did the bullet that entered JFK's throat go ?

THE TRULY MAGICAL DISAPPEARING FRONTAL ENTRY BULLET

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2018, 09:15:08 PM »


        Humes Rejected the SBT and he ran the so called autopsy.  Case Closed

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2018, 09:15:08 PM »

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2018, 09:35:12 PM »


        Humes Rejected the SBT and he ran the so called autopsy.  Case Closed



How could Humes accept or reject the SBT just from taking part in the autopsy?



Did he examine the wounds to Connally?

Did he study the Zapruder film to find out the time (or times) JFK and Connally received their initial wounds?

Did he study the Zapruder film to check the locations of JFK and Connally at the time of the initial wounding?



What a meager argument a CTer needs to convince themselves that the SBT is false. Case Closed.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2018, 09:35:12 PM »

Online Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2018, 09:45:51 PM »

How could Humes accept or reject the SBT just from taking part in the autopsy?



Did he examine the wounds to Connally?

Did he study the Zapruder film to find out the time (or times) JFK and Connally received their initial wounds?

Did he study the Zapruder film to check the locations of JFK and Connally at the time of the initial wounding?



What a meager argument a CTer needs to convince themselves that the SBT is false. Case Closed.

  There's a reason the SBT is a Theory. Try doing some actual research with regard to Humes. You obviously have no idea as to why he Rejected the SBT.

Online Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1408
Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2018, 09:52:23 PM »
The CKs absolutely love to insist that JFK's back wound and throat wound are unrelated. They insist that JFK's throat wound was an entrance wound.

Just one little problem for the Kooks: ask them what happened to the bullet that supposedly entered JFK's throat from the front - and they get a glazed over look on their faces and sit there mouths agape, stuttering and drooling.

So here's the challenge, drooling Kooks - explain what happened to the bullet that you insist entered JFK's throat from the front.

Sorry, rehashing for the billionth time why you think CE399 wounding both JFK and the Governor is an impossibilty, or any other subterfuge or diversion to avoid explaining what happened to the bullet that you insist entered JFK's throat from the front isn't an acceptable response.

Time to man up, Kooks.

Howard,

Why are you limiting the challenge to Kooks only? I think that you may be overusing that term. Not all CTs are Kooks.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The Truly Magical Bullet
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2018, 09:52:23 PM »

 

Mobile View