Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound  (Read 11315 times)

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2018, 06:19:30 PM »
Advertisement
Some of the conspiracy nutbags think O'Donnell was in on the plot. :D

If he gave into intimidation he was

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #8 on: May 25, 2018, 06:19:30 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #9 on: May 25, 2018, 08:55:09 PM »
That's according to Tip O'Neill. He made a similar claim about Dave Powers. Powers denied it.

Add Tip O'Neill to the LN Cavalcade of Liars.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2018, 01:20:06 AM »
If he gave into intimidation he was

He didn't give into intimidation. In a June 15, 1975 article in the Chicago Tribune, headlined "Probe of agency raises new questions in slaying of JFK", O'Donnell was quoted responding to the charge that he and Dave Powers had been pressured by the FBI to change or omit anything from their testimonies: "The story is an absolute lie,... whoever gave that story is lying. It's an absolute, outright lie.... I spent four hours before the commission and my testimony is quite clear. I told them exactly what I saw. I was in charge of the whole operation so I know what happened. I arranged the whole trip...I testified under oath and I stand by it."

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2018, 01:20:06 AM »


Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #11 on: May 26, 2018, 02:42:47 AM »
He didn't give into intimidation. In a June 15, 1975 article in the Chicago Tribune, headlined "Probe of agency raises new questions in slaying of JFK", O'Donnell was quoted responding to the charge that he and Dave Powers had been pressured by the FBI to change or omit anything from their testimonies: "The story is an absolute lie,... whoever gave that story is lying. It's an absolute, outright lie.... I spent four hours before the commission and my testimony is quite clear. I told them exactly what I saw. I was in charge of the whole operation so I know what happened. I arranged the whole trip...I testified under oath and I stand by it."

These new nuts are a different strain of nutty.

Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 128
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2018, 02:51:20 AM »
I'm aware of what the told Ted White ("I was trying to hold his head on") but her testimony ABOUT THE HEAD WOUND before the Warren Commission is hidden away for I forget how many more years.

And, if her WC testimony was similar to what she told Ted White (for the kids in the audience this was during the same conversation where the 2 of them created the whole Camelot myth out of thin air) that means her testimony differed from Clint Hill's as much as could be possible. 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #12 on: May 26, 2018, 02:51:20 AM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #13 on: May 26, 2018, 02:58:13 AM »
These new nuts are a different strain of nutty.

Hi Steve. How are things in the Boston States?

Offline Steve Logan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 286
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2018, 03:41:47 AM »
Hi Steve. How are things in the Boston States?

Hot as hell today.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #14 on: May 26, 2018, 03:41:47 AM »


Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Dr. Malcolm Perry and the JFK head wound
« Reply #15 on: May 26, 2018, 03:47:52 AM »
 Are we suggesting that no one was intimidated in one way or another Robert O Canada and Stringer come to mind,