Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer  (Read 342625 times)

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #176 on: May 24, 2018, 07:32:17 PM »
Advertisement
Benavides: Prime witness, missed the lineup. LOL

On the afternoon of the shooting, Benavides told the police that he wouldn't be able to identify the killer.  Therefore, he certainly is NOT a prime witness.

Why do you sink to such desperate measures?  I'm curious.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #176 on: May 24, 2018, 07:32:17 PM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #177 on: May 24, 2018, 07:45:12 PM »
LOL

Mr. Belin: Let me ask you now, I would like you to relate again the action of the man with the gun as you saw him now.

Mr. Benavides: As I saw him, I really--I mean really got a good view of the man after the bullets were fired he had just turned. He was just turning away........

Billy Bob Brown wrote:
By the way, Benavides felt that he could not positively identify the killer so he never went to City Hall.

No, Billy Bob.....You have your head stuck....   Domingo Benevides had seen Tippit's killer clearly ...( a direct face to face at about twenty feet)    And he saw Lee Oswald's photo on the TV that afternoon and KNEW that he could not Identify Lee as the killer that he'd seen who had his hair cut in a fashion that made the back of his head look flat.

He told the cops that he could not identify Lee Oswald as the man that he'd seen......

Benavides did NOT tell the police that he could not identify Lee Oswald as the killer.

He told the police that he felt he would not be able to positively identify the killer.

This is real simple.

If you guys don't like it, take it up with Benavides.  He is the one who told the police that he wouldn't be able to pick the man out of a lineup.  Your own witness destroys you.

« Last Edit: May 24, 2018, 07:47:14 PM by Bill Brown »

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #178 on: May 24, 2018, 09:19:32 PM »
Explain how Benavides, Markham and Scoggins managed to miss the 2nd killer that Acquilla Clemons supposedly saw.  Go on.  I'll wait.

Strawman.  Clemons never said she saw a killer.  Benavides and Scoggins didn't even see anybody kill anybody.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #178 on: May 24, 2018, 09:19:32 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #179 on: May 24, 2018, 09:20:12 PM »
Do you believe those shells were found near Tippit's patrol car?

I don't know where they were found and neither do you.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #180 on: May 24, 2018, 09:26:47 PM »
Paul Stombaugh.

That's not evidence, that's a person's name.  But I'll play.  Cite Stombaugh ever giving an opinion on the jacket fibers.

Quote
Straw man.

What good is it to even claim that the fibers were "identical" if they can't be shown to be from any specific shirt?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #180 on: May 24, 2018, 09:26:47 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #181 on: May 24, 2018, 09:31:00 PM »



Fact check: Helen Markham positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.
Fact check: William Scoggins positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.
Fact check: Ted Callaway positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.
Fact check: Virginia Davis positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.
Fact check: Barbara Davis positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.
Fact check: Sam Guinyard positively identified Lee Harvey Oswald.

Unfair and biased lineups are unreliable.

Quote
All these eyewitnesses picked out Lee Harvey Oswald in a lineup and as you pointed out the chances of this happening randomly is 1 in 4096,

Who ever claimed that they picked somebody randomly?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #182 on: May 24, 2018, 09:38:38 PM »
Somebody nudge the Richard Smith turntable stylus again.

Poor old Lee just couldn't catch a break that day.  First, he works in the very building from which shots are fired at the president.

So did dozens of other people.

Quote
  And has no alibi.

So did at least 5 other people in the TSBD alone.

Quote
  Then when he knocks off early for a movie,

All of the employees knocked off early.

Quote
he passes the scene of police murder

Says you.

Quote
And Oswald looks so much like the killer that multiple witnesses ID him as the killer.

Good trick since only one person saw anybody kill anybody.

Quote
  And he is carrying a pistol just like the killer.

Says you.

Quote
  And he has the same two brands of ammo just like the killer.held

You don't know what brands of ammo the killer had.  And you probably just believe that the cops held Oswald in a cell for hours before remembering to check his pockets.

Quote
  And he acts so suspiciously that he draws the attention of shoe salesman.

If that's not probable cause to search, beat up and arrest a man for double murder, I don't know what is. 

Quote
  And then he sneaks into the movies without buying a ticket

Nobody saw him sneak into the movies without buying a ticket.

Quote
and for some unknown reason cause a ruckus when approached by the police.

uh, I believe it was the police who caused a ruckus.

Quote
Everyone else is to blame for all of this.  Random citizens are apparently out to frame him for the crime.  Lunacy.

When are you going to get around to actually showing that Oswald killed somebody?  Ever?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #182 on: May 24, 2018, 09:38:38 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Lee Oswald The Cop Killer
« Reply #183 on: May 24, 2018, 09:40:47 PM »
LOL.  That is the best course of action when you have no substantive response.  Like a guilty man taking the 5th.  There is not a single assumption made.  All are documented facts.

Horse hockey.  All you do is make assumptions and call them facts, or outright lie about the evidence.  You wouldn't know a fact about this case if it smacked you in the azz.