9/11/MLK/RFK

[Matt Grantham]

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/conspiracy/q0265.shtml

 It seems odd that the reinforced perimeter walls are not able to break off any visible portion of the engines but the interior walls break them down to small pieces or should I say just one identifiable piece

[Mike Orr]

All they saw at Shanksville Pennsylvania was a hole in the ground. The Coroner of that county left after 20 minutes . No bodies , no blood , no plane.
 
The only "energy" that could have caused the damage that was done at the Twin Towers was massive "High Heat Energy" that could cause such damage to these buildings that over "200,000 Tons of construction steel could be turned into shrapnel, that thousands of tons of concrete could be pulverized into powder, that thousands of tons of metal office equipment could be shredded into small pieces of metal and that "3,000" human bodies could disappear or be turned into Microscopic body parts, such that both buildings looked like they went through a " Shredding Machine."


profjoeval.wordpress.com/tag/raging-fires-did-not-cause-the-collapse-of-the-twin-towers

[Richard Rubio]

As said, Popular Mechanics and Quora debunks most of this rather extensively,

When the Russians murdered hundreds of people over Ukraine who were in a commercial airliner a few years ago, little evidence was there a plane crashed as well because of the impact.

https://www.quora.com/Why-was-there-no-plane-wreckage-in-9-11-terrorist-attacks-on-the-Pentagon

[Richard Rubio]

 Yes I was aware that flight 77 recorder was found, but then I googled some link titled by Forbes that said why were none of the Black Boxes found on the four planes and somehow imagined there was a difference in term flight recorder and black box A faux pas for sure

The destruction at ground zero was beyond belief and is shown very well in Oliver Stone's "911", fine movie:



Black boxes were not made to withstand some amounts of great destruction.

[Matt Grantham]

As said, Popular Mechanics and Quora debunks most of this rather extensively,

 My experience here is that individuals here need to make arguments for themselves rather than quoting the opinions of someone else who you believe is some final authority If you can quote them in an effective manner great, but just saying Popular Mechanics, while typical of most people, is meaningless

[Richard Rubio]

What the "Truthers" say is can be widely seen on the internet and what the debunkers say, likewise, can be found.  So, it is an interesting argument but one can find the questions and responses pretty easily, it's just an exercise in searching the web.

[Richard Rubio]

My experience here is that individuals here need to make arguments for themselves rather than quoting the opinions of someone else who you believe is some final authority If you can quote them in an effective manner great, but just saying Popular Mechanics, while typical of most people, is meaningless

So, you are saying you are an expert in aviation crashes?

If your answer is no, then, perhaps, you can examine your statement about "meaningless"!

[Richard Rubio]

Again, what we are being fed is just "truther" stuff that has been around for more than 15 years, expounded by people like Alex Jones. It's not as if the Truthers are telling us things they came up with.