Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.  (Read 47804 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #112 on: October 21, 2019, 03:24:00 PM »
Advertisement
Don't forget, she said she held the reflex camera up to her eye when she allegedly took the photos, despite the fact that the camera didn't have a viewfinder for taking photos that way.

I don't know that Marina's memory of how she held the camera is worth using as the basis to debate the authenticity of the photo......  She could easily have been recalling a camera that she had used in Russia.....   There are many photos that were taken when Lee Was in Russia.....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #112 on: October 21, 2019, 03:24:00 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #113 on: October 21, 2019, 05:03:27 PM »
He wanted to be someone of historical note and was willing to die for that purpose.

Then why did he deny shooting anyone?

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #114 on: October 21, 2019, 06:04:20 PM »
Then why did he deny shooting anyone?

Touche !  I'm not an expert on assassins... but I believe that they usually are proud of their deed, because they have assassinated a person whom they viewed as a evil person and a threat to society.    ( Which, BTW is exactly how the conspirators that assassinated JFK thought, but they also thought that JFK had abandoned them  at BOP and they wanted revenge)

Lee Oswald never ever showed any sign that he as happy that JFK had been assassinated.... In fact, he became choked up when the reporters enlightened him that JFK had been murdered....By asking him if he had shot the President.   He nearly lost his stoic composure and the police immediately hustled him out of the room.
« Last Edit: October 21, 2019, 08:58:42 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #114 on: October 21, 2019, 06:04:20 PM »


Offline Ted Shields

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 144
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #115 on: October 25, 2019, 10:15:58 AM »
How did they fake Oswalds signature?

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #116 on: October 25, 2019, 11:12:57 AM »
How would you have done it?

Why would the conspirators setup Oswald with the name "Hidell"?
The only person who would use an alias to buy weapons would be Oswald, any other scenario simply adds unnecessary complications and makes no sense.

JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #116 on: October 25, 2019, 11:12:57 AM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #117 on: October 25, 2019, 11:48:05 AM »
The only person who would use an alias to buy weapons would be Oswald, leaving a paper trail to his own P.O. box...

Even though the Dallas equivalent has never been seen/found, the New Orleans Post Office Application shows that Oswald already had your feeble objections worked out and it's reasonable to conclude that if Oswald was having stuff sent to Hidell while he was in Dallas, Oswald would have had Hidell's name on that form as well.



Quote
Time for another break from the forum?

You'd like that wouldn't you, but too bad I'm here for as long as I can stand the stink.

JohnM


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #118 on: October 25, 2019, 02:47:50 PM »
How did they fake Oswalds signature?

Who said anybody faked Oswald's signature?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #118 on: October 25, 2019, 02:47:50 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Oswald's lies proves his guilt.
« Reply #119 on: October 25, 2019, 02:58:34 PM »
Even though the Dallas equivalent has never been seen/found, the New Orleans Post Office Application shows that Oswald already had your feeble objections worked out and it's reasonable to conclude that if Oswald was having stuff sent to Hidell while he was in Dallas, Oswald would have had Hidell's name on that form as well.

CE2585, p. 4:

-----------
12. CLAIM: The Post Office Box in Dallas to which Oswald had the rifle mailed was kept under both his name and that of 'A. Hidell ." Page 111.

INVESTIGATION: Our investigation has revealed that Oswald did not indicate on his application that others, including an 'A . Hidell,' would receive mail through the box in question, which was Post Office Box 2915 in Dallas. This box was obtained by Oswald on October 9, 1962, and relinquished by him on May 14, 1963.
-----------

Besides, who said that "Oswald was having stuff sent to Hidell"?