Oswald's lies proves his guilt.

[John Iacoletti]

This is how the LN "logic" process goes:

"Oswald must have been the one who killed JFK because he lied"

"What was the lie?"

"He said he didn't kill JFK"

[Denis Pointing]

  Take fingertips press onto rifle

Mat, to put it crudely fingerprints are basically perspiration marks...dead people don't tend to perspire too much. Unlike in the movies, you can't just cover a dead person's fingers with some kind of artificial sweat such as oil or grease, all you end up with is a smudgy mess. Nor can you coat a dead person's fingers with fingerprint ink and then press them on an object, all that gives you is an inkprint, not a fingerprint.

[John Iacoletti]

[Martin Weidmann]

You have to ask them that. Your response doesn't address my point.

How would they explain claiming (in reports after his death) that Oswald admitted his guilt, when they told the media, while Oswald was being interrogated, that he denied any involvement?

[Matt Grantham]

Mat, to put it crudely fingerprints are basically perspiration marks...dead people don't tend to perspire too much. Unlike in the movies, you can't just cover a dead person's fingers with some kind of artificial sweat such as oil or grease, all you end up with is a smudgy mess. Nor can you coat a dead person's fingers with fingerprint ink and then press them on an object, all that gives you is an inkprint, not a fingerprint.

https://careertrend.com/how-8593322-fingerprint-dead-person.html

[John Iacoletti]

https://careertrend.com/how-8593322-fingerprint-dead-person.html

Sprinkle powder on the fingers of the corpse and brush off excess powder with the camel hair brush.

Take a piece of tape and press the sticky side against the finger; apply pressure first in the center and then work out from there.

Remove the tape from the finger.

Stick the tape flat against the index card to get a clean, legible fingerprint.

Then claim a week later that you lifted that index card print from a rifle and forgot to tell anybody about it.

[Mike Orr]

Matt -- I liked the References 
     
     " Science of fingerprints : Classification and Uses "; U.S. Department of Justice; 1993

   This just seems like another case where someone of power thinks that you will accept whatever you are told . I don't think there were a lot of people who would stand up and object to what they had been told by an authoritative figure back in 1963. Today those figures don't carry as much clout as they used to !

Good posting , Matt

[John Mytton]

Then claim a week later that you lifted that index card print from a rifle and forgot to tell anybody about it.

Wow what a surprise, another liar! Yawn.
This basically encapsulates the CT case, whoever from whatever walk of life all these seemingly unconnected people collaborated in some way to convict poor little Oswald, from waitresses, to cab drivers, to fellow employees, to rooming house staff, to ticket sellers, to shoe salesman, to policeman, to the CIA, to the FBI and all the way up to LBJ, it looks like nobody wanted Kennedy alive.
So what this amounts to is that I would supply a Mountain of evidence and credible eyewitnesses in a long long line in court and Iacoletti would simply be reduced to claiming that alot of these innocent people for reasons only known to Iacoletti all got together in some massive stadium and decided to lie? But where does this go who benefitted and why, Oswald was insane whereas the alternative is simply unbelievable.



JohnM