Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?  (Read 41977 times)

Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #32 on: January 22, 2018, 10:32:35 PM »
Advertisement
Oswald himself probably couldn't recreate it. On the day he wasn't trying to recreate anything though. He battered 3 rounds rapid down the street and got lucky. It happens. 9/11 is proof it happens.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #32 on: January 22, 2018, 10:32:35 PM »


Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1656
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #33 on: January 23, 2018, 02:53:17 AM »

Zeon?s original post, with my additions:


                                                                                                         
http://alt.assassination.jfk.narkive.com/bp1QdGQL/1967-cbs-special-a-cbs-news-inquiry-the-warren-report

Below I show Zeon and my conclusions. It is true that the rifle often jammed. It appears to jam about half the time, at least with shooters who are unfamiliar with the rifle. And half the time it does not jam.

For the ?first attempt?, I refer to the first attempt that the rifle did not jam and all three shots were made.


                                                                                                       Zeon's conclusions:

1. Al Sherman, Maryland State Trooper                                                 = missed head shot
5.0 seconds - 2 hits in orange silouhette, 1 blue low
6.0 seconds - 2 hits, 1 blue high (1st 2 shots in 2.2 seconds)
NO TIME -- bolt jammed at third cartridge
5.2 seconds - 1 hit, two low
5.0 seconds - 1 hit, 2 upper left blue
       ; Zeon?s conclusion:  missed head shot
       ; Joe?s conclusion:  first attempt ? 2 hits


2. Ron George, Maryland State Trooper                                                   = missed all 3
NO TIME -- bolt jammed after 2nd shot; 3rd fired very late
NO TIME -- 3rd bullet jammed
4.9 seconds - 2 hits, 1 blue upper right
      ; Zeon?s conclusion:  missed all three
     ; Joe?s conclusion: first attempt ? 2 hits


3. John Concini, Maryland State Trooper                                                 = no comfirmed hits
6.3 seconds -- number of hits unreported
5.4 seconds -- 1 hit in silhouette, 2 blues "just low"
     ; Zeon?s conclusion: no confirmed hits
     ; Joe?s conclusion: first attempt: unknown


4. Howard Donahue, weapons engineer                                                   = missed all 3
NO TIME -- second bullet jammed
NO TIME -- jam after first shot
5.2 seconds - 3 hits in orange silhouette grouped in head area (best
target)
     ; Zeon?s conclusion: missed all three
     ; Joe?s conclusion: first attempt ? 3 hits


5. William Fitchett, sporting goods dealer                                              = missed all 3
6.5 seconds -- 3 borderline hits, low & left along silhouette border               
6.0 seconds -- 1 hit orange, 2 low blue
6.1 seconds -- number of hits unreported
     ; Zeon?s conclusion: all three missed
     ; Joe?s conclusion:  first attempt: all three hit


6. Somerset Fitchett, sportsman                                                             = missed head shot
NO TIME -- jammed at 3rd bullet
5.9 seconds -- 2 hits, 1 wide left
5.5 seconds -- 2 hits, 1 low
     Zeon?s conclusion: missed head shot
     Joe?s conclusion: first attempt: 2 hits


7. John Bollendorf, ballistics technician                                                    = no hits in orange
6.8 seconds - 2 hits in silhouette, 1 blue low left
NO TIME -- jam after 2nd shot
NO TIME -- jam again
6.5 seconds -- 1 orange hit, 2 near misses blue upper left                     
     ; Zeon?s conclusion: no hits in orange
     ; Joe?s conclusion: first attempt: 1 hit


8. Douglas Bazemore, ex-paratrooper (Viet vet)                                       = no hits
NO TIME -- stiff bolt action
NO TIME -- unable to work bolt fast enough
NO TIME -- just too stiff for him
NO TIME -- 2 shots in 5 seconds; 3 shots in 9 seconds; gives up
     ; Zeon?s conclusion: no hits
     ; Joe?s conclusion: had problems with the bolt, unrecorded where the shots went


9. Carl Holden, H.P. White employee
NO TIME -- bolt jammed after 1st shot                                                        = no hits
NO TIME -- jammed again
5.4 seconds -- tight group of 3 hits in blue high right
     ; Zeon?s conclusion: no hits
     ; Joe?s conclusion on first attempt: no hits


10. Sid Price, H.P. White employee
5.9 seconds -- 1 hit orange, 1 blue, 1 nowhere (missed target completely)
4.3 seconds -- no hits reported
NO TIME -- jam after 2nd shot
4.1 seconds -- 1 hit orange, 2 complete misses (off blue)
       ; Zeon?s conclusion: not specified
       ; Joe conclusion on first attempt: 1 hit


11. Charles Hamby, H.P. White employee                                                       = no hits
NO TIME -- jammed
NO TIME -- jammed
6.5 seconds -- 2 blues close to silhouette, 1 completely missed target
     ; Zeon?s conclusion: no hits
     ; Joe?s conclusion on first attempt: no hits








I can see why you were reluctant to show the source of your claims, that all shooters missed all their shots on their first attempt.



There is one big problem with your scoring.

It is standard for shooters to receive instructions that any hit within the silhouette is a hit. Not that only a hit in the head area is a hit, but that any hit, anywhere in the silhouette is a hit. So, naturally, the shooters would aim at the ?fattest? part of the target, the chest area, to maximize their chances of getting a hit. Not at the head.

In contrast, someone trying to kill someone, and is shooting at short ranges, like under 100 yards, may chose to aim at the head, to maximize the odds of a fatal hit, even though they are shooting at a smaller target than the upper torso.


Questions:

Do you have any evidence that the CBS shooters were instructed to aim at the ?head? and not at the ?torso? part of the silhouette? And that any shot not on the ?head?, even one on the ?torso?, would be considered a miss?

Can you give any example, EVER, in any shooting test, that shooters where presented with a silhouette of a head and torso, but were instructed that any hit on the torso would be considered a ?Miss? and only a hit on the ?Head? would be considered a ?Hit?.




I anticipate that you will dodge this question.




Joe?s Points:

** The 11 CBS shooters were all volunteers. I do not know if there was a single expert in the group. I doubt it. Several were Maryland State troopers, who would have some experience with firearms. I don?t know about all the H. P. White employees.

** The shooters were rushed more than Oswald. It appears they were trying to get off their shots in under 6 seconds. The best evidence, unknown in 1967, is that the shots were probably spaced over 8.7 seconds, and possibly longer.

** We have testimony from his wife that Oswald did not go target practicing with his rifle at lot, but did do so on at least one occasion, that she knows of.

** We have testimony from his wife that Oswald did practice a lot working the bolt. He may have been better at avoiding jams than any of the 11 CBS shooters.



Of the 11 CBS shooters:

** Counting unreported results as:  0 hits

** Defining the ?First attempt? as the first time the rifle successfully fired 3 shots


I find that:

** 4 shooters missed all the shots

** 2 shooters got 1 hit, 2 misses

** 3 shooters got 2 hits, 1 miss

** 2 shooters got 3 hits, no misses

For an average of 1.64 hits per shooter, on a moving target.


Basically, these shooters had a 50/50 chance of getting off three shots and if they did get off three shots, they got an average of 1.64 hits.


Joe?s Conclusions:

** Even if Oswald, with all the practice he had with the rifle bolt, was no better at avoiding rifle jams than the 11 CBS shooters, he had a 50 / 50 chance of getting off three shots.

** The Shooting tests imply that Oswald should get 1.64 hits. This is close to the 2 hits he did get.


The rifle was not ideal. Its biggest problem was its tendency to jam. But there is a good chance it would not jam. Perhaps a very good change for a shooter with proficiency working the bolt. Oswald may have been such a shooter, with his opportunity to practice over the course of several months.

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4236
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2018, 03:03:35 AM »
                                                                                                         
http://alt.assassination.jfk.narkive.com/bp1QdGQL/1967-cbs-special-a-cbs-news-inquiry-the-warren-report

                                                                                                       Zeon's conclusions:

1. Al Sherman, Maryland State Trooper                                                 = missed head shot
5.0 seconds - 2 hits in orange silouhette, 1 blue low
6.0 seconds - 2 hits, 1 blue high (1st 2 shots in 2.2 seconds)
NO TIME -- bolt jammed at third cartridge
5.2 seconds - 1 hit, two low
5.0 seconds - 1 hit, 2 upper left blue

2. Ron George, Maryland State Trooper                                                   = missed all 3
NO TIME -- bolt jammed after 2nd shot; 3rd fired very late
NO TIME -- 3rd bullet jammed
4.9 seconds - 2 hits, 1 blue upper right

3. John Concini, Maryland State Trooper                                                 = no comfirmed hits
6.3 seconds -- number of hits unreported
5.4 seconds -- 1 hit in silhouette, 2 blues "just low"

4. Howard Donahue, weapons engineer                                                   = missed all 3
NO TIME -- second bullet jammed
NO TIME -- jam after first shot
5.2 seconds - 3 hits in orange silhouette grouped in head area (best
target)

5. William Fitchett, sporting goods dealder                                              = missed all 3
6.5 seconds -- 3 borderline hits, low & left along silhouette border               
6.0 seconds -- 1 hit orange, 2 low blue
6.1 seconds -- number of hits unreported

6. Somerset Fitchett, sportsman                                                             = missed head shot
NO TIME -- jammed at 3rd bullet
5.9 seconds -- 2 hits, 1 wide left
5.5 seconds -- 2 hits, 1 low

7. John Bollendorf, ballistics technician                                                    = no hits in orange
6.8 seconds - 2 hits in silhouette, 1 blue low left
NO TIME -- jam after 2nd shot
NO TIME -- jam again
6.5 seconds -- 1 orange hit, 2 near misses blue upper left                     

8. Douglas Bazemore, ex-paratrooper (Viet vet)                                       = no hits
NO TIME -- stiff bolt action
NO TIME -- unable to work bolt fast enough
NO TIME -- just too stiff for him
NO TIME -- 2 shots in 5 seconds; 3 shots in 9 seconds; gives up

9. Carl Holden, H.P. White employee
NO TIME -- bolt jammed after 1st shot                                                        = no hits
NO TIME -- jammed again
5.4 seconds -- tight group of 3 hits in blue high right

10. Sid Price, H.P. White employee
5.9 seconds -- 1 hit orange, 1 blue, 1 nowhere (missed target completely)
4.3 seconds -- no hits reported
NO TIME -- jam after 2nd shot
4.1 seconds -- 1 hit orange, 2 complete misses (off blue)

11. Charles Hamby, H.P. White employee                                                       = no hits
NO TIME -- jammed
NO TIME -- jammed
6.5 seconds -- 2 blues close to silhouette, 1 completely missed target



Hey Zeon, did they use Oswald's actual rifle? and if not then all problems with the actual rifle mechanism is not applicable, sorry about that.
So all we are left with is average riflemen who were as mostly as accurate as Oswald. Nice!

Btw the CBS doco was using the 4.6 second timespan.



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #34 on: January 23, 2018, 03:03:35 AM »


Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 921
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #35 on: January 23, 2018, 03:56:11 PM »
5+ seconds is the correct time to use. The idea there was an early missed shot is unsupported complete nonsense. JFK reacted to the first shot which is exactly what the eyewitnesses stated happened. An early missed shot is nothing more than an attempt to try to explain away the 2.3 second cycle time of LHO's carcano.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2018, 09:17:18 PM »
Skeptics don?t trust witnesses,

Then why do LN "skeptics" trust Howard Brennan?

Quote
And it appears that Oswald got two out of three hits. And he was lucky with one, the neck shot, that missed the most likely target, the center of the head, by about 8 inches, which will probably cause a total miss, except he happened to miss downward.

There you go again, taking your unsupported opinion and calling it "likely".

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #36 on: January 23, 2018, 09:17:18 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10812
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #37 on: January 23, 2018, 09:19:23 PM »
Our best ?witness?, whose ?memory? never changes over the years, whose ?memory? is not influenced by what it hears from other people, shows:

** A probable shot at z153

**** strong camera jiggle at frames z158-z159
**** Kennedy, Connally and Rosemary Willis seemingly reacting to something by the z160?s

** Almost certainly a shot at z222

**** strong camera jiggle at frame 227
**** Connally?s coat movement at frame z224
**** Connally and Kennedy both jerking their right arm up at z226
**** The other reactions Connally and Kennedy make during the z220?s

** An absolutely certain shot at z312

**** strong camera jiggle at frame 318
**** Obvious explosive head wound that is first visible in frame z313

No, the film shows what it shows.  What you are describing is what you as somebody witnessing the film thinks he is seeing.  And as you said, skeptics don't trust witnesses.

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1656
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #38 on: January 24, 2018, 02:14:43 AM »


and the 2 military combat vet snipers:

Craig Roberts was a former Marine sniper who later wrote a book on the JFK assassination called ?Kill Zone.? Roberts visited the 6th floor window of the Texas School Book Depository and instantly realized that Oswald could not have performed the shooting feat because he knew that he himself could not. And he was a professional.

Roberts interviewed Sergeant Carlos Hathcock, the former senior instructor at the Marines Corps Sniper Instruction School at Quantico, Virginia. Roberts asked Hathcock if he thought Oswald could have done what the Warren Commission said he did. Hathcock said no.
Hathcock reconstructed the assassination at Quantico: the angle, moving target, time limit etc. he told Roberts, ?I don?t know how many times we tried it, but we couldn?t duplicate what the Warren Commission said Oswald did.

http://www.plaintruth.com/the_plain_truth/2013/11/jfk-how-good-of-a-shot-was-oswald.html



No. The CTers do not have two former Marines who claim Oswald could not have made those shots. Instead, they have:

1.   Craig Roberts

and:

2.   Craig Roberts claiming that Carlos Hathcock said that those shots could not be made.


I am skeptical that Carlos Hathcock said that those shots could not be made. And that Carlos Hathcock said that he and other top Marines tried to recreate those shots and couldn?t. I am skeptical because it doesn?t make since that no one could make those shots, all at under 100 yards.

And I saw a Discover Channel program where a CTer, Michael Yardley, using a Carcano, shot 16 times at a melon size target, moving at 10 mph, at the similar speeds and angles as the LN alleged shots, and hit the melon 16 times in all 16 hots. He talks about these subjects the following video:



Now, which is the more logical conclusion:

1.   Michael Yardley, basically an expert with shotguns, was a better shot with a rifle than Carlos Hathcock or any Marine that Hathcock knew.

Or:

2.   Craig Roberts is lying.

I find the second possibility; Craig Roberts is simply a liar much more plausible. I believe that Craig Roberts claims first surfaced after Carlos Hathcock became seriously ill and not in a good condition to refute Roberts claims. And Carlos Hathcock passed away shortly after these claims were first made.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #38 on: January 24, 2018, 02:14:43 AM »


Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1656
Re: The shot sequence, bang......bang......bang?
« Reply #39 on: January 24, 2018, 02:25:02 AM »


No, the film shows what it shows.  What you are describing is what you as somebody witnessing the film thinks he is seeing.  And as you said, skeptics don't trust witnesses.



Scientific knowledge, it could be said, is based on eyewitness observation. But these are observations that can be made repeatedly, over and over. If one scientist makes an observation, he could repeat the experiment. And other scientists can repeat the experiment. Under these circumstances, eyewitness observation is reliable.



If we had a time machine where witnesses could travel back in time, to confirmed their observations, I would be a lot more confident in witnesses. Particularly if I and anyone else could also travel back in time over and over again to confirm and reconfirm what happened.

But witnesses only witness something once. And their impressions can be false. Or change over time. Or be influenced by what others tell them, possibly within a few minutes of the event. That makes them unreliable.


But we do have a time machine, of sorts. It is the Zapruder film. We can observe it over and over again. We can see the movements of Rosemary Willis, Connally and JFK. We can see the film over and over again to confirm when they move and how they move. And conclude the forward spray seen in frame 313 implies a shot from behind and is not the result of me misremembering what I saw, that the spray when backwards or there was no spray at all.