Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !  (Read 28918 times)

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #56 on: April 26, 2018, 11:34:30 PM »
Advertisement
You haven't demonstrated that they were his rifle and pistol.  Or that that rifle and pistol killed anybody.

What "bullets"?  You mean the near pristine bullet allegedly found on an unrelated stretcher at Parkland Hospital?

His fingerprints where?  On book boxes where he worked getting books out of boxes?

You haven't demonstrated what rifle and pistol appear in the photos.

You haven't demonstrated that he shot Tippit.

You haven't demonstrated that he shot at Walker.

You haven't demonstrated that he was trying to hide and escape.

Care to try again?


You haven't demonstrated what rifle and pistol appear in the photos.

It would be a great leap forward if people would stop using the plural when referring to a BY photo....Because clearly as least ONE photo is the photo that Marina was familiar with, and the print that Lee Oswald autographed for George De Morhenschildt.....That photo is CE 133A.   

And the revolver on Lee's hip in that "carnival prop" photo , does NOT appear to be a Smith and Wesson ......The butt of the revolver looks more like a Colt....

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #56 on: April 26, 2018, 11:34:30 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #57 on: April 27, 2018, 12:12:28 AM »
Walt,

There is no doubt that BRW knew exactly where he had eaten his lunch. Who was going to question his "recollection"?

BRW was no fool either and he would of had an "interesting" time trying to explain to the DP what he was doing in the SE corner some 5 minutes prior to the shots being fired without hearing or seeing anyone else on the 6th floor.

Better to tow the line than being potentially labeled as a conspirator. Could you imagine the "fallout"?

Tony, I doubt that the bonnie lad was there on the sixth floor of his own volition ....  Someone sent him there....and I strongly suspect that he would have been killed and an accomplice of the arch villain if Lee Oswald hadn't inadvertently tossed a monkey's wrench into the machinery of the coup d e'tat   If Lee had been there on the sixth floor both he and BRW  would have been "caught in the act" and been killed.... Case closed.     

Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 894
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #58 on: April 27, 2018, 01:48:11 PM »
You haven't demonstrated that they were his rifle and pistol.  Or that that rifle and pistol killed anybody.

What "bullets"?  You mean the near pristine bullet allegedly found on an unrelated stretcher at Parkland Hospital?

His fingerprints where?  On book boxes where he worked getting books out of boxes?

You haven't demonstrated what rifle and pistol appear in the photos.

You haven't demonstrated that he shot Tippit.

You haven't demonstrated that he shot at Walker.

You haven't demonstrated that he was trying to hide and escape.

Care to try again?



The evidence was not presented based upon your satisfaction, approval, and/ or agreement. It is your turn, now it is time to show the evidence that exhonerates LHO and explains who was really responsible for the assassination. You have given a constant stream of posts as to why a piece evidence is not the answer now is the time to be either a contender or a pretender. The stage is all yours. If there was evidence of another person present it.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #58 on: April 27, 2018, 01:48:11 PM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #59 on: April 27, 2018, 02:03:41 PM »

The window in the SW Corner wide open is 2 and 1/2 feet tall and starts 14 inches above the floor. You obviously understand Rowland's description of the gunman in the window is fabricated. You presented Hess's freakishly small, 3 feet tall people animation as proof and completely ignored the real photos of BRW, Norman, Jarmin, and the agents measuring the window.  Actual people standing by the window prove how badly distorted was his description of the gunman in the window.



Rowland said that the man he saw was standing back from the window. not close to it. So Hess's animation is quite acceptable.

"We looked and at that time I noticed on the sixth floor of the building that there was a man back from the window, not hanging out the window."

Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #60 on: April 27, 2018, 08:23:53 PM »
Rowland said that the man he saw was standing back from the window. not close to it. So Hess's animation is quite acceptable.

"We looked and at that time I noticed on the sixth floor of the building that there was a man back from the window, not hanging out the window."

Rowland saw the man holding a sniper rifle ( A high power hunting rifle with a large scope) .....So (because of the angle from Rowland up to the window) the man could no have been very far back from the window.....
« Last Edit: April 27, 2018, 09:32:02 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #60 on: April 27, 2018, 08:23:53 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #61 on: April 27, 2018, 10:11:14 PM »
The evidence was not presented based upon your satisfaction, approval, and/ or agreement.

You didn't present any evidence at all -- just several unsupported claims.

Quote
It is your turn, now it is time to show the evidence that exhonerates LHO and explains who was really responsible for the assassination. You have given a constant stream of posts as to why a piece evidence is not the answer now is the time to be either a contender or a pretender. The stage is all yours. If there was evidence of another person present it.

Yet another "Oswald did it" devotee who doesn't understand burden of proof.  I never claimed that Oswald was innocent or that I knew who was really responsible for the assassination.  You, on the other hand, claimed that "LHO is the most likely candidate" and tried to justify that with statements that can't even withstand the slightest amount of scrutiny.

"His fingerprints".  How compelling.

Then you try to smear Arnold Rowland and completely ignore that Howard Brennan did all the same things you criticize Rowland for and more.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #62 on: April 27, 2018, 10:24:52 PM »
This whole train of thought is completely unbelievable. BRW supposedly freely interacts with an unknown assassin and wanders around the 6th floor eating chicken and drinking pop. He is not killed but instead allowed to leave and join his friends a floor below where he watches the motorcade knowing full well that the person in the SN is going to shoot JFK.

Must you misrepresent everything?  Who ever said that BRW freely interacted with an unknown assassin and wandered around the 6th floor eating chicken and drinking pop?  All he said was that BRW was known to be on the sixth floor by a window eating his lunch when Arnold Rowland saw a negro in the window.  Why the hell would Rowland make something like that up?

Quote
This can't possibly be even remotely a possible scenario. The only way BRW leaves the 6th floor alive is if the assassin does not feel BRW knows he is there.

You're forgetting that your assassin only had the foresight to bring 4 bullets.  He's going to waste one on BRW?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #62 on: April 27, 2018, 10:24:52 PM »


Offline Jack Nessan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 894
Re: There was No Roll Call at the TSBD !
« Reply #63 on: April 28, 2018, 02:37:24 AM »
You didn't present any evidence at all -- just several unsupported claims.

Yet another "Oswald did it" devotee who doesn't understand burden of proof.  I never claimed that Oswald was innocent or that I knew who was really responsible for the assassination.  You, on the other hand, claimed that "LHO is the most likely candidate" and tried to justify that with statements that can't even withstand the slightest amount of scrutiny.

"His fingerprints".  How compelling.

Then you try to smear Arnold Rowland and completely ignore that Howard Brennan did all the same things you criticize Rowland for and more.


Ok. No answer of any kind and same ole BS, Pretender it is.