Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Where is Dan Rather?  (Read 15179 times)

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2018, 11:43:06 PM »
Advertisement
Condescending to an entire state now.  Nice going, Bill.

https://sofrep.com/36086/truth-jesse-venturas-navy-seal-status

Why is that ironic?

Jesse Ventura is a known JFK conspiracy theorist. Virtually all theories say that Oswald is innocent... and never fired the shots that killed JFK. The ballistic evidence is ignored and instead the "time constraint" defense is invoked. This is subjective because the time for the shooting sequence is not known with absolute certainty. The shortest possible time frame is selected for tests. This was demonstrated in the 1967 CBS tests in Maryland.

When a person "tries" to achieve something in a particular time span--to prove it cannot be done--there's always the possibility that:

(a.) He (or she) is not trying hard enough "to" achieve the task.

(b.) He (or she) is actually trying "not to" achieve the task.

Jesse Ventura had trouble working the bolt-action of the rifle and (supposedly) gave up in disgust. It looked like a stunt.

Irony? Jesse Ventura was a professional wrestler. Persuasive "deception" is the prime skill of a "wrassler". The conclusion to most matches could be described as stunts.

Incredible coincidence? Ventura wrestled Backlund!!!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2018, 11:43:06 PM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7394
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #9 on: April 20, 2018, 12:31:18 AM »
Jesse Ventura is a known JFK conspiracy theorist. Virtually all theories say that Oswald is innocent... and never fired the shots that killed JFK. The ballistic evidence is ignored and instead the "time constraint" defense is invoked. This is subjective because the time for the shooting sequence is not known with absolute certainty. The shortest possible time frame is selected for tests. This was demonstrated in the 1967 CBS tests in Maryland.

When a person "tries" to achieve something in a particular time span--to prove it cannot be done--there's always the possibility that:

(a.) He (or she) is not trying hard enough "to" achieve the task.

(b.) He (or she) is actually trying "not to" achieve the task.

Jesse Ventura had trouble working the bolt-action of the rifle and (supposedly) gave up in disgust. It looked like a stunt.

Irony? Jesse Ventura was a professional wrestler. Persuasive "deception" is the prime skill of a "wrassler". The conclusion to most matches could be described as stunts.

Incredible coincidence? Ventura wrestled Backlund!!!

The ballistic evidence is ignored

What exactly is the ballistic evidence?

Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2018, 02:00:24 AM »
 The CBS demonstration only showed one person able to accomplish the feat so not much of confirmation Yes you do not want people with a bias if you can avoid it, but surely you are not going to suggest the CBS folks weren't trying  It seems the LN's only like experiments with melons, questionable recreations of simulated tissue etc , are the only preferable kinds of demonstration that are supposed to prove something hopefully scientist will not begin to go with your theorem of just because it has never been done doesn't mean it cannot happen someday

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #10 on: April 20, 2018, 02:00:24 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #11 on: April 20, 2018, 02:12:00 AM »
Condescending to an entire state now.  Nice going, Bill.

https://sofrep.com/36086/truth-jesse-venturas-navy-seal-status

Why is that ironic?

Add the States that voted Trump. Some have reversed that; more to come... thus gaining back their 'Sanity Card' status.

Your Special Ops seal site shelters their own of course. Others have differing views of the UD component.

You know what 8.3 refers to.
« Last Edit: April 20, 2018, 04:45:30 AM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Joe Elliott

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1656
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2018, 05:02:00 AM »

That's "Governor Ventura" to you.


Not to me. I?m not from Minnesota, ?The Land of More than Ten Thousand Bad Voters?.

I?m not certain that this recent trend in America, electing non-politicians to high office, is a good trend. It?s good to see how someone handles himself in other elected offices for many years to see how they do before electing them to a higher office. ?All politicians are scoundrels?. And Ventura and Trump are not?
« Last Edit: April 20, 2018, 05:15:48 AM by Joe Elliott »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #12 on: April 20, 2018, 05:02:00 AM »


Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #13 on: April 20, 2018, 07:00:05 AM »
The ballistic evidence is ignored

What exactly is the ballistic evidence?

CE399 matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

The Limo bullet fragments matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

We are off topic. But why not: Backlund has abandoned his own "subject".

Offline Ross Lidell

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 451
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2018, 07:08:54 AM »
The CBS demonstration only showed one person able to accomplish the feat so not much of confirmation Yes you do not want people with a bias if you can avoid it, but surely you are not going to suggest the CBS folks weren't trying  It seems the LN's only like experiments with melons, questionable recreations of simulated tissue etc , are the only preferable kinds of demonstration that are supposed to prove something hopefully scientist will not begin to go with your theorem of just because it has never been done doesn't mean it cannot happen someday

Yes... I believe the CBS "shooters" were trying. Trying to replicate the shooting sequence in less time than Oswald took to fire three shots.

It seems the LN's only like experiments with melons, questionable recreations of simulated tissue etc , are the only preferable kinds of demonstration that are supposed to prove something

You willing to be a live target?

hopefully scientist will not begin to go with your theorem of just because it has never been done doesn't mean it cannot happen someday

You've got me wrong. I think it (3 shots from the TSBD with a Carcano) can be done and think that it was done by Oswald.

I think Jesse Ventura (who wrestled Backlund) deliberately screwed up his attempt to fire 3 shots with a Carcano in less than 6 seconds.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #14 on: April 20, 2018, 07:08:54 AM »


Online Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7394
Re: Where is Dan Rather?
« Reply #15 on: April 20, 2018, 01:07:21 PM »
CE399 matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

The Limo bullet fragments matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

We are off topic. But why not: Backlund has abandoned his own "subject".

CE399 matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

Great, now all you have to do is prove that the bullet now in evidence is the same one that Tomlinson found on a stretcher at Parkland.


The Limo bullet fragments matched to Oswald's Carcano to the exclusion of any other weapon ever made.

Are you sure about that? But it doesn't really matter, just like the bullet now in evidence as CE 399, the fragments allegedly found in the limousine were given to the FBI by the Secret Service, who allegedly collected them from the limo before the FBI team that was supposed to search the car arrived. So, you really need to prove that the fragments now in evidence were indeed found in the limo.

I think you are going to have a problem in proving either which means that the ballastics are worthless as well.