Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: A handful of Dallas authorities seemed like they were all over the place.  (Read 701 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 725
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
...and forgot to hand in "Oswald's" .38 pistol.

He never forgot to hand in Oswald's revolver.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 725
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
If I understand correctly Hill reported to Westbrook so that would put very few connected players from the DPD at crucial positions in the investigation Namely Westbrook Hill and Croy claims an unknown man handed him the wallet at the scene Similar to Westbrook's claim that he is not sure what officer told him to look for the grey jacket at the gas station These individual ambiguity of these key facts is pretty troubling

Pretty troubling? LOL! Hyperbole much? It's a jacket. Oswald merely wore it. He didn't use it to kill Tippit. The Jacket was readily identifiable and recording every little detail about it and it's handling at the time was not high priority.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Pretty troubling? LOL! Hyperbole much? It's a jacket. Oswald merely wore it. He didn't use it to kill Tippit. The Jacket was readily identifiable and recording every little detail about it and it's handling at the time was not high priority.

it's handling at the time was not high priority.

Really?

So, your position is that individual officers got to decide which pieces of evidence were "high priority" or not?

Online Matt Grantham

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Pretty troubling? LOL! Hyperbole much? It's a jacket. Oswald merely wore it. He didn't use it to kill Tippit. The Jacket was readily identifiable and recording every little detail about it and it's handling at the time was not high priority.

 Every little detail? The two most important events are the moments and circumstance in which the jacket and wallet are discover and I dare see they could not be much more ambiguity We are not discussing small details of some sort If we are to accept the notion that officials become disoriented when big events are happening then we certainly make it easier for said officials to lie and conspire
« Last Edit: April 13, 2018, 10:46:55 PM by Matt Grantham »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 725
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
it's handling at the time was not high priority.

Really?

So, your position is that individual officers got to decide which pieces of evidence were "high priority" or not?

Yes.

JFK Assassination Forum


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 725
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Every little detail The two most important events are the moments and circumstance in which the jacket and wallet are discover and I dare see they could not be much more ambiguous We are not discussing small details of some sort If we are to accept the notion that officials become disoriented when big events are happening then we certain make it easier for said officials to lie and conspire

They are not ambiguous at all. The jacket was readily identifiable. In fact, the detail that made it readily identifiable was called in to Radio Dispatch very shortly after the jacket was discovered. The officials weren't disoriented. It's just that the jacket itself was not a crime scene. It was a jacket. They had bigger things on their plate. They had a cop killer to apprehend.

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1365
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Pretty troubling? LOL! Hyperbole much? It's a jacket. Oswald merely wore it. He didn't use it to kill Tippit. The Jacket was readily identifiable and recording every little detail about it and it's handling at the time was not high priority.

There's no evidence that Oswald wore that particular jacket.

Online Martin Weidmann

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 475
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

it's handling at the time was not high priority.

Really?

So, your position is that individual officers got to decide which pieces of evidence were "high priority" or not?


You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

Yes.


Amazing.

So, how does this work exactly when a piece of evidence not deemed to be high priority suddenly becomes extremely significant? There is no chain of custody, so how do you make that piece of evidence "high priority" again?

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

They are not ambiguous at all. The jacket was readily identifiable. In fact, the detail that made it readily identifiable was called in to Radio Dispatch very shortly after the jacket was discovered. The officials weren't disoriented. It's just that the jacket itself was not a crime scene. It was a jacket. They had bigger things on their plate. They had a cop killer to apprehend.


Tim, a stapled on dry-cleaning label (which could not be linked to a dry-cleaner anywhere in the greater Dallas and New Orleans area) doesn't make the jacket it is stapled on to "readily identifiable". It just means that label was possibly attached to the white jacket found at the parking.

JFK Assassination Forum


Online Matt Grantham

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 95
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
They are not ambiguous at all. The jacket was readily identifiable. In fact, the detail that made it readily identifiable was called in to Radio Dispatch very shortly after the jacket was discovered. The officials weren't disoriented. It's just that the jacket itself was not a crime scene. It was a jacket. They had bigger things on their plate. They had a cop killer to apprehend.


 Details is in the context of by whom and through what circumstances was the jacket, and wallet found found rather than anything pertaining to the jacket and wallet as distinct items No one suggested they make reports in the middle of this rather that they would not remember the events and make them a priority after catching Oswald is what is being addressed Lets add on the fact that Westbrook was ever able to mention that he is the person who drove Oswald from the TT back to the police station according to the Dallas reporter that was with him
« Last Edit: April 13, 2018, 11:32:39 PM by Matt Grantham »

Online Brian Walker

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 52
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
There's no evidence that Oswald wore that particular jacket.


Translation..There is no picture of Oswald wearing the jacket on that day.

JFK Assassination Forum