Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Autopsy proves SBT impossible  (Read 56970 times)

Offline Bernd Werner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #88 on: April 30, 2018, 09:03:19 PM »
Advertisement
Doctors who saw the wound pre-tracheotomy said it was an entrance wound. Their reasoning: The shock

wave from a rifle bullet would have created more damage and left a much larger exit wound in the front of

JFK's throat.

Unfortunately these doctors had no experience with wound ballistics, so there reasoning was just the guess of laymen.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #88 on: April 30, 2018, 09:03:19 PM »


Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #89 on: April 30, 2018, 09:34:28 PM »
Which is at best a wild speculation by Sibert an O'Neill, or is there any evidence supporting this path?

Do you think Sibert and O'Neill just made this up?  Or were they reporting what they heard the autopsy doctors saying?

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #90 on: April 30, 2018, 09:55:30 PM »
I know, that there was no analysis of the bullet path of the non lethal wound. If this path was not analysed, no definite assertion about the angle of the entering bullet could be made.

Then why did the autopsy doctors make that assertion?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #90 on: April 30, 2018, 09:55:30 PM »


Offline Bernd Werner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #91 on: April 30, 2018, 10:02:54 PM »
Then why did the autopsy doctors make that assertion?

I don't know, I don't even know, if they even stated it. All I know is, that the bullet path was not probed, and that guys, that refuse the single bullet theory use this as an argument, if it matches their believes. It is quite funny, that you ignore this now, as it doesn't fit!

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10810
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #92 on: April 30, 2018, 10:04:26 PM »
I don't know, I don't even know, if they even stated it. All I know is, that the bullet path was not probed, and that guys, that refuse the single bullet theory use this as an argument, if it matches their believes. It is quite funny, that you ignore this now, as it doesn't fit!

So if your point is that the autopsy doctors didn't know what they were doing, I'll go along with that.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #92 on: April 30, 2018, 10:04:26 PM »


Offline Matt Grantham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 902
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #93 on: April 30, 2018, 10:22:56 PM »
 Bernard  said

I know, that there was no analysis of the bullet path of the non lethal wound. If this path was not analysed, no definite assertion about the angle of the entering bullet could be made. If anyone cites this angle as evidence against the single bullet theory, I'd call this person disingenuous! I for myself try to relate on actual evidence.


 Matt replies  Who has ever asserted this? Folks cite that most of them thought it was an entrance wound, but the angle? I don't get it

Offline Mike Orr

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #94 on: May 01, 2018, 06:36:23 PM »
 Specter asked Pierre Finck, " Could CE 399 have been the bullet which inflicted the wound on Governor Connally's right wrist?"

 "No," Finck replied, " for the reason that there are too many fragments described in that wrist," the problem being as Finck put it, " there was practically no loss of this bullet."

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #94 on: May 01, 2018, 06:36:23 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1824
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #95 on: May 01, 2018, 07:53:53 PM »
Specter asked Pierre Finck, " Could CE 399 have been the bullet which inflicted the wound on Governor Connally's right wrist?"

 "No," Finck replied, " for the reason that there are too many fragments described in that wrist," the problem being as Finck put it, " there was practically no loss of this bullet."

Finck was wrong. There were five fragments in the wrist. One of the five was considerably larger than the other four. If all five fragments had been the size of the largest, their combined mass would still not exceed the amount of mass missing from CE-399.