Autopsy proves SBT impossible

[Matt Grantham]

Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC? Should everyone who observed the autopsy have been called before the Commission?

 Probably Yes but especially FBI

[Tim Nickerson]

Probably Yes but especially FBI

Why would the two FBI agents, who were there as observers, be more important than John Stringer(photographer) and John Ebersole(Radiologist)?

[Gary Craig]

Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC? Should everyone who observed the autopsy have been called before the Commission?

"Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC?"

They took notes and filed a report. And they didn't burn them and rewrite it after Ozzie was murdered by

Ruby.

The relevant question is; "Why weren't they called before the commission?"

The answer is, what they saw and put in their report was in direct conflict with the WCR, especially

Spector's "Magic Bullet".

They were called before the HSCA. They drew the illustrations below depicting JFK's wounds for that

committee.

Sibert


O'Neil




INTERVIEW WITH FORMER FBI AGENT JAMES SIBERT (JUNE 30, 2005)

[Royell Storing]

Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC? Should everyone who observed the autopsy have been called before the Commission?

      FBI Agents that viewed the JFK Autopsy and filed a report citing "surgery to the head area" being present when JFK's body was initially removed from his coffin, should have been questioned by the WC.

[Ray Mitcham]

"Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC?"

They took notes and filed a report. And they didn't burn them and rewrite it after Ozzie was murdered by

Ruby.

The relevant question is; "Why weren't they called before the commission?"

The answer is, what they saw and put in their report was in direct conflict with the WCR, especially

Spector's "Magic Bullet".

They were called before the HSCA. They drew the illustrations below depicting JFK's wounds for that

committee.

Sibert


O'Neil




INTERVIEW WITH FORMER FBI AGENT JAMES SIBERT (JUNE 30, 2005)

Oops, their sketches seem to destroy Tim's sketch of the entry point. They MUST have been mistaken or are LYING.

Thanks for posting these, Gary.

[Ken Jacobs]

Why don't you ask the man who stood at JFK's shoulder, helping move the body for photos, xrays, etc.? If he tells you he saw, from inches away, a small entry wound in JFK's temple, exactly where the Press Secretary pointed to as he announced JFK's death, how would this have occurred?

[Tim Nickerson]

"Why should Sibert and O'Neill have been called before the WC?"

They took notes and filed a report. And they didn't burn them and rewrite it after Ozzie was murdered by

Ruby.

The relevant question is; "Why weren't they called before the commission?"

The answer is, what they saw and put in their report was in direct conflict with the WCR, especially

Spector's "Magic Bullet".

They were called before the HSCA. They drew the illustrations below depicting JFK's wounds for that

committee.

Sibert


O'Neil



INTERVIEW WITH FORMER FBI AGENT JAMES SIBERT (JUNE 30, 2005)

"Examination of photographs of anterior and posterior views of thorax, and anterior, posterior and lateral views of neck (Photographs 3, 4, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 17, 18, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 38, 39, 40, 41). There is an elliptical penetrating wound of the skin of the back located approximately 15 cm. medial to the right acromial process, 5 cm. lateral to the mid-dorsal line and 14 cm. below the right mastoid process. This wound lies approximately 5.5 cm. below a transverse fold in the skin of the neck. This fold can also be seen in a lateral view of the neck which shows an anterior tracheotomy wound. This view makes it possible to compare the levels of these two wounds in relation to that of the horizontal plane of the body. A well defined zone of discoloration of the edge of the back wound, most pronounced on its upper and outer margins, identifies it as having the characteristics of the entrance wound of a bullet. The wound with its marginal abrasion measures approximately 7 mm. in width by 10 mm. in length. The dimensions of this cutaneous wound are consistent with those of a wound produced by a bullet similar to that which constitutes exhibit CE 399. At the site of and above the tracheotomy incision in the front of the neck, there can be identified the upper half of the circumference of a circular cutaneous wound the appearance of which is characteristic of that of the exit wound of a bullet. The lower half of this circular wound is obscured by the surgically produced tracheotomy incision which transects it. The center of the circular wound is situated approximately 9 cm. below the transverse fold in the skin of the neck described in a preceding paragraph. This indicates that the bullet which produced the two wounds followed a course downward and to the left in Its passage through the body."

http://www.jfklancer.com/ClarkPanel.html

[Tim Nickerson]

Oops, their sketches seem to destroy Tim's sketch of the entry point. They MUST have been mistaken or are LYING.

Thanks for posting these, Gary.

Here's another one for you Ray: