Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Autopsy proves SBT impossible  (Read 11569 times)

Offline Bernd Werner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #290 on: May 24, 2018, 10:55:16 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No. Where is the evidence of a shot from the GK?

The evidence are the 33 people (according to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) testifying that they heard shots from the grassy knoll. According to your interpretation of witness testimony this means, that there was a shooter at the grassy knoll!

Quote
Experience and clinical trials show that witnesses are generally accurate in observing salient details of an event.
A salient detail is a detail that most witnesses of the event recalled.  See: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login

And the Warren Commission surely used multiple choice tests for their interrogations. You can't be serious, can you?

BTW, the book you quote actually supports my point of view on witness testimony, as it focusses on the fallability of such testimony. Quoting a part of the book and neglecting the rest is nothing else than quote mining!

Quote
Experts who provide opinions that do not fit with well corroborated witness accounts are invariably wrong. I can give you many examples.

No, it is indeed vice versa! Witness testimony is actually quite unreliable, I think the Wikipedia article on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  is a good starting point for your own research on that topic.

Quote
Not really. He figured it out. He knew it was not the first shot and he knew that it was not the last shot. And he recalled hearing exactly three shots.

Really?

I would guess it was either the second or third. I wouldn’t say definitely on which one.

I believe that it was the second shot, so I heard the third shot afterwards.

That's not knowing to me, that's guessing!

Futhermore: Tague testified, that there was a fresh bullet mark on the curb.

About 12 to 15 feet right on the top of round of the curb, was the mark that very definitely was fresh, and I would say it was a mark of a bullet.

This contradicts your hypothesis, that all bullets hit Kennedy and/or Connally. Why do you exclude this part of his testimony?

Quote
The problems occur when you fail to consider all the remaining possibilities or when you exclude something as impossible when it isn't.

Well, there is no evidence for your hypothesis of three shots that hit, but there is evidence for a shot that didn't hit. So your hypothesis seems quite impossible.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Who has excluded the impossible?

The Warren Commission (yes, they indeed got something right!).

Quote
I'm still waiting for a LNer to demonstrate the trajectory and body positions of JFK and Connally that makes it work.


And I am still waiting for a conspiracy buff to demonstrate that the single bullet is not possible.

Quote
Where is your evidence that this was even possible?


In contrast to conspiracy buffs, the "lone nutters" did experiments and proved, that the single bullet indeed was possible.

Quote
I can't prove it wasn't possible because that would be proving a negative. It's up to you to at least show that it was possible, so you can exclude the impossible, otherwise, you're stuck with improbable.

That's a very lousy attempt of shifting the burden of proof and actually wrong! You cannot prove, that something doesn't exist, but you can prove, that something didn't happen.

Example: I can prove easily, that the Las Vegas Knights didn't win the Stanley Cup in 2017, because they joined the NHL for the season 2017/18.

Quote
I could post frames of the fireball blasting out of JFK's right temple and the top right side of his head but I'm sure you have some obfuscation for it, so I won't bother.

It is new to me, that a fireball bursted out of Kennedy's head, I always thought it were brain tissue and blood.

Quote
So why did you think the magic bullet crashed thru bones and came out looking so pristine?

Which bones were hit by the bullet?

Quote
Go ahead and draw the red line on Z312 yourself. What angle do you get when you just clear the windshield, providing it did? My graphics weren't intended to be a photogrammetric analysis but don't let me stop you:

1) Using Google Maps, go to a satellite view of the overpass and measure the distance from the overpass to JFK's head at Z312.
2) Find out the height of the overpass at the point where the trajectory angle lines up with JFK's head orientation at Z312.
3) Assume the limo was tipped down 5 degrees on its path down Elm.
4) Use some geometry to see if the bullet cleared the windshield before striking JFK's head. (IMO the knoll shot was the frangible bullet)
5) Exclude the impossible and see what's left.

As I am well aware of the geometrical problems involved, I won't do that. Your analysis is doomed to fail, because your approach is flawed. A line drawn on a two dimensional picture does not reproduce the angle in the three dimensional environment.

Quote
I'm merely proposing that if the head shot came from the front, to have cleared the windshield, then it must have came from the overpass. Simple as that. Never claimed that's how it happened, only that it was possible. See the difference?

OT, but nevertheless totally impossible.
« Last Edit: May 24, 2018, 11:19:49 PM by Bernd Werner »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #290 on: May 24, 2018, 10:55:16 PM »


Online Paul Ernst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
  • Semper peratus semper idem
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #291 on: May 24, 2018, 11:17:05 PM »
 :D

Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2541
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #292 on: May 24, 2018, 11:47:02 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
In contrast to conspiracy buffs, the "lone nutters" did experiments and proved, that the single bullet indeed was possible.

Only if you make a lot of assumptions about contradictory accounts of the wound locations, the exact positions of the limo occupants, and the location of the shooter.

But lots of things are possible.  Can they show that it actually happened?  And so what if it did?  How does that get you to the identity of the shooter?

Online Andrew Mason

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 201
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #293 on: May 25, 2018, 12:02:21 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The evidence are the 33 people (according to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) testifying that they heard shots from the grassy knoll. According to your interpretation of witness testimony this means, that there was a shooter at the grassy knoll!
No it doesn't.  The quality of a witness observation is depends on the ability of a human to make the observation.  Detecting gunshot sounds and the relative spacing is rather easy to do.  Determining where the shots came from is much more difficult. Direction is determined by the brain sensing a time difference between the sound wave front reaching each ear.  The sense of direction can be fooled by reflected sound. Dealey Plaza had many surfaces that reflected sound.  So I would expect that some people would be confused as to the direction of the sound source.  That confusion is reflected in the distribution of witness evidence. 

Having said that, many more witnesses said the sound source was around the TSBD. According the the analysis of earwitness accounts by DM Green for the HSCA (at 8 HSCA 140), the distribution of 178 witnesses was:

TSBD: 49  (27.5%)
GK:  21  (11.8%)
Other: 30  (16.9%)
Unknown: 78   (43.8%)

Quote
BTW, the book you quote actually supports my point of view on witness testimony, as it focusses on the fallability of such testimony. Quoting a part of the book and neglecting the rest is nothing else than quote mining!
Eyewitness identification evidence is problematic. Unless the witness recognized the person at the time of the event, eyewitness identification is really an opinion of a witness that the person being seen in a photograph or lineup is the same person that they saw earlier.

But, fact observation is fundamentally different.  As the studies referred to by Loftus show, where a detail is recalled by most eyewitnesses, accuracy is quite high - around 98%. This makes perfect sense. Where you have many witnesses independently saying the same thing, it boggles the mind to suggest that they all independently made up the same fact!

Any given witness can be wrong.  My point is that you do not have to know anything about and individual's reliability as a witness to determine that if 22+ people independently reported seeing a simple observable fact and 0 reported a different fact, you are making a big mistake if you find in favour of the fact that 0 people observed.






Offline Bernd Werner

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #294 on: May 25, 2018, 12:08:32 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Only if you make a lot of assumptions about contradictory accounts of the wound locations, the exact positions of the limo occupants, and the location of the shooter.

1. There are various photographs and x-rays, that can be used to find out the wound locations.

2. The position of the "limo occupants" can be established by photos and videos.

3. The location of the shooter can be established by aligning the entrance and exit wounds of JFk.

Quote
But lots of things are possible.  Can they show that it actually happened?

And how about you? Can you prove, that the single bullet didn't happen?

Quote
And so what if it did?  How does that get you to the identity of the shooter?

Quite easy, if you know the position of the shooter, you can search this place for further evidence and link it to the shooter.

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
No it doesn't.  The quality of a witness observation is depends on the ability of a human to make the observation.

But that contradicts your previous argument. Just to remind you, you stated:

Quote
An individual witness can be wrong. But if multiple independent witnesses report consistent observations, on what basis can that evidence be disregarded?

It seems, that you are trying to move the goalpost.

Quote
Detecting gunshot sounds and the relative spacing is rather easy to do.
 

Obviously not, as many witnesses (including Tague!) testified, that they thought the first shot was a firecracker or  a backfire of one of the vehicles!

Quote
Determining where the shots came from is much more difficult. Direction is determined by the brain sensing a time difference between the sound wave front reaching each ear.  The sense of direction can be fooled by reflected sound. Dealey Plaza had many surfaces that reflected sound.  So I would expect that some people would be confused as to the direction of the sound source. That confusion is reflected in the distribution of witness evidence. 

While this is surely true (see Zapruders testimony [I do not classify him as an "knoll witness" because of this fact]), can you prove this for every witness?

Quote
Having said that, many more witnesses said the sound source was around the TSBD.


This is of course true, but it is no contradiction to a shooter at the grassy knoll! The common argument is, that a further shooter was present at the grassy knoll and this proves a conspiracy (which is actually not true).

Quote
But, fact observation is fundamentally different.  As the studies referred to by Loftus show, where a detail is recalled by most eyewitnesses, accuracy is quite high - around 98%.


What part of her book are you referring to? Is it table 3.1? If so, did you know, that this table represents the results of a multiple choice test? Now tell me, which investigator uses multiple choice tests for his interrogations?

Quote
Where you have many witnesses independently saying the same thing, it boggles the mind to suggest that they all independently made up the same fact!

I never claimed, that the witnesses made up this fact! You are just putting words in my mouth.You futhermore fell prey to the "argumentum ad populum fallacy". Just because a lot of people said, that something occured, doesn't necessarily mean, that something occured. You have to confirm this accounts by actual facts.

Quote
Any given witness can be wrong.  My point is that you do not have to know anything about and individual's reliability as a witness to determine that if 22+ people independently reported seeing a simple observable fact and 0 reported a different fact, you are making a big mistake if you find in favour of the fact that 0 people observed.

Well, to the best of my knowledge no witness ever observed, that a bullet fragmented, therefore it didn't happen (according to YOUR logic).
« Last Edit: May 25, 2018, 12:36:09 AM by Bernd Werner »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #294 on: May 25, 2018, 12:08:32 AM »


Online John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2541
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #295 on: May 25, 2018, 12:39:02 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
1. There are various photographs and x-rays, that can be used to find out the wound locations.

You would think so, wouldn't you?  Unfortunately, different panels examining the same materials couldn't even agree on where the entry wound in the head was located.

Quote
2. The position of the "limo occupants" can be established by photos and videos.

Somewhat.  Unless the areas of interest are not visible in the photos and videos.  And there's the problem of interpolating 3D position from a 2D image.

Quote
3. The location of the shooter can be established by aligning the entrance and exit wounds of JFk.

Assuming you can figure out where those are, IF they are entries or exits, and didn't deflect much in transit.  Then you can only get direction, not distance.  And there's even a margin of error on direction.

Quote
And how about you? Can you prove, that the single bullet didn't happen?

Did I miss your proof that it did happen?  I don't know if it happened or not.  Or even how that helps us determine who did the shooting.

Quote
Quite easy, if you know the position of the shooter, you can search this place for further evidence and link it to the shooter.

Be my guest.

Online Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 916
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #296 on: May 27, 2018, 01:41:46 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Nice try, but several witnesses reported the second and third shots as a "bam-bam" and stressed they were "very close together" (Lee Bowers, et al). If Oswald or any other human was operating the "humanitarian rifle", they would have to cycle the bolt after the second shot and reacquire the target AND fire accurately. Can anyone honestly say that there's such a thing as two shots "very close together" from a bolt action rifle? I think not...

I started this thread knowing there would be many who would concoct scenarios to fit the discredited SBT. But the extent to which folks twist the evidence reminds me of trying to have an intelligent discussion with a Trump supporter. I will state it again because I'm an ineffective communicator. The single bullet theory is impossible because no shots exited from the front of the president's body. Several witnesses saw the president before the SBT could be fabricated. They report the throat wound as one of entrance. End of ballgame for SBT, just from a different direction!

I read that HSCA testing showed the rifle could be fired twice in 1.67 seconds. The catch is that the second one of the two shots missed; only the first could be aimed precisely. I would contend that even just pointing at the target still leaves open the possibility that the shooter could have scored the headshot due to pure dumb luck.

Online Paul Ernst

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 625
  • Semper peratus semper idem
Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #297 on: May 29, 2018, 12:13:49 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The evidence are the 33 people (according to You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login) testifying that they heard shots from the grassy knoll. According to your interpretation of witness testimony this means, that there was a shooter at the grassy knoll!

And the Warren Commission surely used multiple choice tests for their interrogations. You can't be serious, can you?

BTW, the book you quote actually supports my point of view on witness testimony, as it focusses on the fallability of such testimony. Quoting a part of the book and neglecting the rest is nothing else than quote mining!

No, it is indeed vice versa! Witness testimony is actually quite unreliable, I think the Wikipedia article on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login  is a good starting point for your own research on that topic.

Really?

I would guess it was either the second or third. I wouldn’t say definitely on which one.

I believe that it was the second shot, so I heard the third shot afterwards.

That's not knowing to me, that's guessing!

Futhermore: Tague testified, that there was a fresh bullet mark on the curb.

About 12 to 15 feet right on the top of round of the curb, was the mark that very definitely was fresh, and I would say it was a mark of a bullet.

This contradicts your hypothesis, that all bullets hit Kennedy and/or Connally. Why do you exclude this part of his testimony?

Well, there is no evidence for your hypothesis of three shots that hit, but there is evidence for a shot that didn't hit. So your hypothesis seems quite impossible.

The Warren Commission (yes, they indeed got something right!).
 

And I am still waiting for a conspiracy buff to demonstrate that the single bullet is not possible.
 

In contrast to conspiracy buffs, the "lone nutters" did experiments and proved, that the single bullet indeed was possible.

That's a very lousy attempt of shifting the burden of proof and actually wrong! You cannot prove, that something doesn't exist, but you can prove, that something didn't happen.

Example: I can prove easily, that the Las Vegas Knights didn't win the Stanley Cup in 2017, because they joined the NHL for the season 2017/18.

It is new to me, that a fireball bursted out of Kennedy's head, I always thought it were brain tissue and blood.

Which bones were hit by the bullet?

As I am well aware of the geometrical problems involved, I won't do that. Your analysis is doomed to fail, because your approach is flawed. A line drawn on a two dimensional picture does not reproduce the angle in the three dimensional environment.

OT, but nevertheless totally impossible.

In contrast to conspiracy buffs, the "lone nutters" did experiments and proved, that the single bullet indeed was possible.

Show the CT side or demonstrate.

 :D

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Autopsy proves SBT impossible
« Reply #297 on: May 29, 2018, 12:13:49 AM »