Autopsy proves SBT impossible

[Matt Grantham]

There is no missing x-ray.

." (7 HSCA 115)
The next nail on the box demonstrating forgery or tampering
with the autopsy photographs and X-rays is Dr. Humes' clear
statements about having taken chest photographs, which are
missing from the National Archives: "That's one photograph that
we were distressed not to find when we first went through and
catalogued these photographs, (in 1966-7) because I distinctly
recall going to great lengths to try and get the interior upper
6
portion of the right thorax illuminated--you know the technical
difficulties with that, getting the camera positioned and so
forth, and what happened to that film, I don't know. There were
a couple of films that apparently had been exposed to light or
whatever and then not developed, but we never saw that
photograph." (7 HSCA 253) This is more evidence of Robert
Bouck's "burn party."

[Tim Nickerson]

." (7 HSCA 115)
The next nail on the box demonstrating forgery or tampering
with the autopsy photographs and X-rays is Dr. Humes' clear
statements about having taken chest photographs, which are
missing from the National Archives: "That's one photograph that
we were distressed not to find when we first went through and
catalogued these photographs, (in 1966-7) because I distinctly
recall going to great lengths to try and get the interior upper
6
portion of the right thorax illuminated--you know the technical
difficulties with that, getting the camera positioned and so
forth, and what happened to that film, I don't know. There were
a couple of films that apparently had been exposed to light or
whatever and then not developed, but we never saw that
photograph." (7 HSCA 253) This is more evidence of Robert
Bouck's "burn party."

Humes thought that a photograph of the opened upper chest had been taken. A photograph. It's unlikely that such a photograph was taken but that's another matter. There is no missing x-ray.

[Matt Grantham]

Humes thought that a photograph of the opened upper chest had been taken. A photograph. It's unlikely that such a photograph was taken but that's another matter. There is no missing x-ray.

 Semantics Xray of the upper chest correct? Supposedly there is one but I cannot find it

[Gary Craig]

Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.

http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.html

http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.html

Date: 1-21-67 12:00 Noon

Time: 7 mins 25 secs at the end of a 8 mins 31 secs conversation

Phone Conversation between Acting Attorney General Ramsey Clark and President Lyndon Johnson
Re: Autopsy Photos

-snip-

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

-snip-

"It could be contended that that photo could show the course and direction the bullet that entered the lower part of the neck and exited the front part."

-snip-

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that] we don't have."

-snip-

[Matt Grantham]

Here is the Attorney General, in a taped phone call, telling LBJ they don't have the photo of JFK's right lung.
The one Humes testified was taken.

http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.html

http://www.jfklancer.com/Clark.LBJ.html

Date: 1-21-67 12:00 Noon

Time: 7 mins 25 secs at the end of a 8 mins 31 secs conversation

 If the back shot did enter the upper lung , and not just the superficial of a couple of inches that Humes implies, then there is the problem of where is the bullet Stating the obvious I know, but the LN will come hunting that all this is all the riddle that falls at the feet of the CT

Phone Conversation between Acting Attorney General Ramsey Clark and President Lyndon Johnson
Re: Autopsy Photos

-snip-

"That is, there may be a photo missing. Dr. Humes, Commander and Naval doctor, testified before the Warren Commission that this one photo made of the highest portion of the right lung."

-snip-

"It could be contended that that photo could show the course and direction the bullet that entered the lower part of the neck and exited the front part."

-snip-

"We are left with one specific problem. Dr. Humes did testify before the Warren Commission there was such a photo [that] we don't have."

-snip-

[Andrew Mason]

The newbie is not only arrogant but misinformed. Do your research on what the autopsy witnesses said. There was considerable confusion about how the back wound did not exit the president. Again, tired of explaining this, but unless you can manufacture another wound on the rear of the president's body that DID exit on the front, the imbecilic SBT is COMPLETELY OBLITERATED. Never mind all the other evidence that shows the theory is total nonsense. The official autopsy report is such a pack of lies, it should be featured in every forensic textbook as an example of how NOT to conduct an autopsy.
You state:
"If one accepts that JFK's back wound was an entry wound and that no bullet was found in the body, it stands to reason that the bullet transversed his body and could have gone on to strike JBC." No, remember, Humes probed the wound and could feel the end of it with his finger. THE BULLET DID NOT TRAVERSE THE BODY. How could this bullet have been a threat to JBC? Come on SBT folks, let's hear more nonsense explanations of this!

What is more imbecilic? 1. to conclude that the probing of the wound path done by Humes was not determinative of the actual path, or 2. to conclude that a finger-sized bullet just stopped after penetrating a few inches of flesh and striking no bone and then disappeared?

[Matt Grantham]

What is more imbecilic? 1. to conclude that the probing of the wound path done by Humes was not determinative of the actual path, or 2. to conclude that a finger-sized bullet just stopped after penetrating a few inches of flesh and striking no bone and then disappeared?

1-Humes told not to probe the path

2- The bullet you claimed disappeared appeared at either Parkland or with Dr Young

 Haven't we been through this before?