Can anybody provide proof of a successful reenactment of Oswald's feat?

[Jack Nessan]

How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment? The FBI needed to add 3 shims to the scope mount just so they could hit the target, let alone thread the needle. And why would qualified sharpshooter Oswald not have sighted in the scope when he practiced his ass off, as ALL sharpshooters must do to keep sharp? Ans: because he never even fired CE 139, otherwise, he would have left at least 1 print on it that wasn't put there post-mortem.

Face it, CE 139 was the planted patsy rifle. They used it to shoot magic bullet CE 399 into a swimming pool so they could plant it on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition with no DNA on it. Yeah, not too difficult.

Exactly how do you align a scope to a rifle configured in the manner the carcano had been configured in? The scope mounting is offset to the left side of the barrel. If you align it to be pinpoint with the rifle barrel it is only accurate at one distance. If you align the scope to be parallel with the barrel, LHO would have had to known to estimate the crosshair setting to the left for an accurate shot. 



These were short range not long range shot distances. The use of a scope was not required.

How could anyone possibly have known they would have to "plant" anything at the hospital?

[Jerry Freeman]

These were short range not long range shot distances. The use of a scope was not required.

Begs the question why was a scope left on the rifle then? It provided a distraction if anything.

How could anyone possibly have known they would have to "plant" anything at the hospital?

A nice juicy bullet that could be linked to that rifle was required to further convince the faithful that Oswald did it.

[Jack Nessan]

Begs the question why was a scope left on the rifle then? It provided a distraction if anything. A nice juicy bullet that could be linked to that rifle was required to further convince the faithful that Oswald did it.

In what way would a scope, out of the line of sight of the iron sights, be a distraction? If nothing else it would work as a telescope. The use of the iron sights was in no way hindered by the scope being mounted on the rifle.

Somebody knew in advance that the bullet would pass through JFK's neck and strike JBC in the back? They would both be in Parkland needing medical attention?

Fragments from the second bullet also matched the same rifle. The rifle found on the 6th floor.

[Jerry Freeman]

In what way would a scope, out of the line of sight of the iron sights, be a distraction? If nothing else it would work as a telescope. The use of the iron sights was in no way hindered by the scope being mounted on the rifle.

So why would someone need a telescope? Either a scope was required or it wasn't.

Somebody knew in advance that the bullet would pass through JFK's neck and strike JBC in the back? They would both be in Parkland needing medical attention?

If a bullet was indeed planted...it was while they were there. If the men who were shot and taken to Baylor Hospital ...who knows?

  Fragments from the second bullet also matched the same rifle. The rifle found on the 6th floor.

Someone knew this in advance? 

[Ted Shields]

How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment?

We don't know if it was wonky when he fired it or it got wonky when he stashed the rifle or when it was clumsily handled by the police when they found it before the FBI tested it.

And, if there was a shot from the knoll, how was the left side of his head relatively undamaged? A rifle shot from that close and that trajectory would've went through his head. And hollow point ammo would've blown his head apart like a watermelon.

[Richard Smith]

How about with a wonky scope that no one so far has incorporated into their re-enactment? The FBI needed to add 3 shims to the scope mount just so they could hit the target, let alone thread the needle. And why would qualified sharpshooter Oswald not have sighted in the scope when he practiced his ass off, as ALL sharpshooters must do to keep sharp? Ans: because he never even fired CE 139, otherwise, he would have left at least 1 print on it that wasn't put there post-mortem.

Face it, CE 139 was the planted patsy rifle. They used it to shoot magic bullet CE 399 into a swimming pool so they could plant it on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition with no DNA on it. Yeah, not too difficult.

I've often read CTers claim that the scope was defective.  And could not have been used by Oswald for that reason.  How would anyone know the condition of the scope at the moment of the assassination?  All that is known comes from examining it after the assassination.  That is after the rifle had been placed or dropped between some boxes during Oswald's flight which could have impacted the scope.  In addition, I recall that the scope was removed to check for fingerprints on the rifle.  Does anyone know if this occurred before or after testing the condition of the scope?   If the scope was removed and then replaced by the authorities, that could explain any misalignment.  Even if the scope were misaligned, a shooter who practiced with that rifle could compensate for any deficiency. 

[Jack Nessan]

So why would someone need a telescope? Either a scope was required or it wasn't. If a bullet was indeed planted...it was while they were there. If the men who were shot and taken to Baylor Hospital ...who knows? Someone knew this in advance?

Trojan---"Face it, CE 139 was the planted patsy rifle. They used it to shoot magic bullet CE 399 into a swimming pool so they could plant it on the wrong stretcher in pristine condition with no DNA on it. Yeah, not too difficult"

The claim was the bullet was prefired into  a pool of water so it could be planted to implicate LHO.    " Somebody knew in advance that the bullet would pass through JFK's neck and strike JBC in the back? They would both be in Parkland needing medical attention?"

There was no need to use the scope. There was no need to remove the scope. A choice was made to leave it on the rifle.

Fragments from the second bullet also matched the same rifle. The rifle found on the 6th floor. The fragments were found in the Presidential Limousine. The whole bullet was found in Parkland on a stretcher.

[Jerry Freeman]

Fragments from the second bullet also matched the same rifle. The rifle found on the 6th floor.

Let's explain that. That idea is absolutely impossible. A reach beyond belief.
You just simply cannot match a fragment of a bullet to a rifle. An entire bullet was required. Bullets are matched to weapons by their groove marks. 
1. There is no 'proof' that Lee Oswald fired this rifle and shot anyone.
2. There has been no re-enactment duplicating the proposed shooting attributed by the official report.