Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 305958 times)

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Prayer Woman
« Reply #4360 on: May 14, 2019, 01:40:27 PM »

Sandy Larsen proved that the man going up the extension was Lovelady by matching the plaid bars on his shirt to the man on the extension...He then deleted his photo forensic match once he realized it proved the timing of Frazier talking to Sarah...

I find his denial of his own evidence and refusal to discuss it to be less than truthful...

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Prayer Woman
« Reply #4361 on: May 15, 2019, 01:40:35 PM »

It needs to be noted that Sandy Larsen was here yesterday but declined to comment on my calling him out on his matching the plaid bars on Lovelady's shirt with the man on the extension but then deleting it...

In my personal opinion Larsen's lack of response suggests guilt and an indirect admission that he cannot account for this...

It also defines the real purpose of my being censored...

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2984
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4362 on: May 15, 2019, 02:15:17 PM »
It needs to be noted that Sandy Larsen was here yesterday but declined to comment on my calling him out on his matching the plaid bars on Lovelady's shirt with the man on the extension but then deleting it...

In my personal opinion Larsen's lack of response suggests guilt and an indirect admission that he cannot account for this...

It also defines the real purpose of my being censored...

I sent him an email on the subject a couple of months ago, but he never replied.

Don't go into a big rant now about how incredibly unfair the research community is to you. We've all heard it a million times now.

-- MWT  :)
« Last Edit: May 15, 2019, 06:13:03 PM by Thomas Graves »

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Prayer Woman
« Reply #4363 on: May 15, 2019, 03:33:21 PM »
He knows he's guilty of it and he is using the opposition being selectively banned to avoid accounting for it...

The community decided to destroy its credibility rather than admit wrongness on Prayer Man...

I left a message on Frazier's answering machine yesterday...

Davidson takes a long time to answer but then doesn't answer the point...

Greg Parker must have a contact address for Sean Murphy since he collaborated with him...No one asks Parker about this or seeks Murphy (because they know it is BS)...
« Last Edit: May 15, 2019, 04:29:16 PM by Brian Doyle »

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 615
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4364 on: May 15, 2019, 10:41:04 PM »
And now, some 55+ years later, there is still not any eyewitness testimony/statement placing LeeHarveyOswald on the TSBD Bldg Elm St Entrance Landing at 12:30pm CST on 11/22/'63, and/or at the time of the Assassination of JFK Sr and Wounding of JBC Jr. And, among potential eyewitnesses were many co-workers, including BuellWesleyFrazier that LHO rode to work with that very morning, who would have recognized the soon to be, arguably, the most famous accused LoneGunmanAssassin of all time.

We have witnesses claiming there were shots from the knoll Larry but in the end it don't mean nothing because it doesn't prove nothing.
If witnesses really meant something to you which I highly doubt, you wouldn't be wasting your time here, there's a hole in the back of his head the size according to more than one witness and that's all you need apparently... right?
Takes 25yrs for Frazier to tell us he saw LHO walking along Houston and suddenly it's a hard fact to some people in this lil' world of ours.  I just don't get it.  Like you'd change your mind if one was found, or a relative of one who claimed "they told me he/she saw him there", it's ridiculous.

"I didn't shoot nobody", remember?  There's your "witness" right there.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Prayer Woman
« Reply #4365 on: May 15, 2019, 10:58:35 PM »
It's frustrating to be skilled amongst the skill-less...

I advise people to take a look at Andrej Stancak's latest offering on the other forum's Prayer Man Is A Man thread...

FINALLY someone has gotten the height lines correct and adapted them to the internal perspective of the image! Hoorah!

But typical of Stancak he then fudges his calculations in order to force Prayer Man to be Oswald...

Please take a look at Stancak's drawing of the 5 foot 4 line as landing on Frazier's mouth...It is incorrectly drawn...A human head is 8 to 9 inches in length from the top of the head to the chin...Frazier was 6 foot 1/2 inch tall, so that means that if you subtract the 8 inch average head length from Frazier's 6 foot 1/2 inch height you would get 5 foot 4...Which means the 5 foot 4 line should cross at Frazier's chin...But typical of Stancak he tweaks it to run across Frazier's mouth...Frazier's mouth was approximately 2 inches above Frazier's chin...So the height level of Frazier's mouth would be 5 foot 6 and not 5 foot 4 as Stancak incorrectly places it...Stancak is giving wrong measurements according to the known science he pretends to be offering...

Stancak is once again proving our case for us but coming to the wrong conclusions...The fact he has finally shown the correct height lines in his graphic that accurately conform to the internal perspective in Darnell shows that his heights are now deadly accurate IF PROPERLY SHOWN...However he has cheated and placed the 5 foot 4 line at Frazier's mouth when the 8 inch average length for a human head makes that 5 foot 4 level always occur at Frazier's chin...

One look at the Darnell image shows Prayer Man's head to line up with Frazier's chin and therefore proves Prayer Man is exactly Sarah Stanton's 5 foot 4 height...

The reason Stancak has cheated and deliberately violated his own science is because he is trying to force Prayer Man to be 5 foot 2 so he can then add the 7 inches of the step and make him Oswald's 5 foot 9...But he is trapped by his own science and the precision of his now-correct height lines...Nobody points out to Stancak the easily-seen, publicly-presented fatal conflicts in his offerings that he once again ignores...

Thank you very much Mr Stancak...



 
« Last Edit: May 15, 2019, 11:10:50 PM by Brian Doyle »

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 615
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4366 on: May 15, 2019, 11:36:19 PM »

The frame you are showing is the frame in question...
...

PM in that frame is distorted and Chris did far better with the other frame and I appreciate him posting it here for us.  It's a far more natural looking figure and has at least some resemblance to what we see in Darnell and a normal human being w/e sex it is.  It's a major correction but what's done is done.
That's a careful enhancement of Wiegman PM but what you have been focusing on is a freak but some people(you mainly) just cannot unsee it and it's a complete waste of time to try and make them.  We should expect you to at least comment on Chris' "woman" though, if you were an upfront and honest person which i'm sure you are.  AFAIK you have yet to even recognise it's existance but I'd have to go check your response to his recent posts here, something I've been avoiding because it's become such an unbearable chore.

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3357
Prayer Woman
« Reply #4367 on: May 16, 2019, 01:33:50 AM »


Barry...I don't know what you're talking about...The frame Davidson showed is the steady, clear frame that possesses Sarah's face...It possesses a clearly visible female face and therefore proves Prayer Man is not Oswald...

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 615
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4368 on: May 16, 2019, 08:18:04 AM »
There is another frame that provides an alternative take on the Weigman PM and it's a careful and focused enhancement.  Unlike the freak that came about by complete accident.  One big clue for the layman is the big "forehead" coming out of PM's skull in the frame you like, it's actually longer than Herman Munster's(no joke, it really is).

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 615
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #4369 on: May 16, 2019, 01:04:38 PM »
...


The technique was the same for both frames but we have two very different looking faces/heads, so will you at least recognise "the other woman" to begin with Brian?  Perhaps someone can isolate "her from the gif for us(or I could try later)? 

 

Mobile View