Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 355904 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1860 on: July 03, 2018, 05:34:04 PM »
Back to Lovelady in Wiegman!

What is this we are seeing in Altgens?




Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1861 on: July 03, 2018, 05:51:35 PM »
MrDuncanMacRae:

After turning discussions into battles elsewhere, with "aid and comfort", the PrayerManImage/LeeHarveyOswald theory promoters were able to shut down debate, by causing the "disputes" to be severely limited, if at all. And, on one Forum, even to the process of moving "some posted comments" to a "Pit", which is not accessible unless "signed-on", which eliminates non-members, as well as "banned posters". Also, on said forum, there appears to be a "limited timing" applied to some "members" which of course eliminates full access to posting, as after "timed-out", any access is denied.
Surely, MrMacRae, you are aware, so just a 'reminder'.
« Last Edit: July 03, 2018, 05:58:07 PM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2146
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1862 on: July 03, 2018, 06:28:31 PM »
Thank you, Ray! More shameless moderator-baiting from Brian. Not surprising no other forum will have him. Duncan has the patient of a saint  Thumb1:

Friends, in the interests of peace, fraternity and all-round fellowship, I'm going to take a lil 24-hour break from posting to let Brian and Larry cool off. Attacking PM=LHO, and getting annihilated point for point, must be exhausting. Hopefully they will have moved on to Pauline Sanders (a.k.a. Great White Saviour #2) by then!  Thumb1:

Meanwhile, what are we seeing here?



Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1863 on: July 04, 2018, 01:42:29 AM »
Back to Lovelady in Wiegman!

What is this we are seeing in Altgens?


Would it actually be part of a step?
Thought it might be part of someone in the street at first, not sure.

Also Alan that Bell clip is confusing, could be a blue shirt or white/off white, might be on the east side of the rail, can't tell, can't recognise anyone, even Resse or Dean, there might be a slightly better gif out there and I'll keep an eye out.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1864 on: July 04, 2018, 01:44:40 AM »
Nevermind , too high to be a step, could be behind Shelley though.

Offline Barry Pollard

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 600
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1865 on: July 04, 2018, 03:35:39 AM »
Everyone at sometime in their life as had that feeling of being set up, perhaps it was just for a practical joke if your lucky but we know that feeling and don't forget it. Oswald was no chump, what would he have done if he had that feeling on this day? Go along with it and then when he had the chance at the last minute, give 'em the slip? Why not?
The only way to avoid this is to physically stop him, what happens then?  Well think about it and explain how that is even an option?
No chump, no way, never pictured him like that, not once.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1866 on: July 04, 2018, 05:41:03 AM »
Wasn't insulting you personally, Mr Trotter, just your contributions to the discussion---which are thin to the point of utter vacuity.
You, on the other hand, are, I have no doubt, a fine and worthwhile human being!  Thumb1:

"VACUITY"-NOUN-1)lack of thought or intelligence;empty headedness. 2)empty space;emptiness.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1867 on: July 04, 2018, 07:03:59 AM »
So you can't. You, Brian and Larry are the only ones still steering the Good Ship Sarah. Good luck with that!



 ::)No luck needed, as sufficient provable evidence places SarahDeanStanton on the TSBD Bldg entrance landing, just before, at, and just after 12:30pm CST, 11/22/'63, and recorded statement information, from family members, indicative of her large size, but her height at 5'4"-5'6" maximum, has been made.
But, talk about luck, this posted picture from a film of the entrance portal at about 12:31pm CST offers considerable evidence that the only PersonImage seen on the landing just as and/or just seconds after the shooting assassination of JFK Sr, and wounding of JBC Jr, that fits said description, is PrayerPersonImage.

Talk about indicative information being available to establish additional provable evidence that PrayerPersonImage is aka PrayerWomanImage, and said image represents MsSarahDeanStaton.

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1868 on: July 04, 2018, 07:43:33 AM »


No other TSBD entrance stairs/landing occupant confirmed or indicated the presence of LeeHarveyOswald at said time.
No eyewitness confirmed or indicated the presence of LeeHarveyOswald on the entrance landing/stairs at said time.
Neither Bldg Superintendent RoyTruly, or DPD Officer MarrionBaker confirmed or indicated seeing LeeHarveyOswald on the entrance landing/stairs at said time as they had entered the bldg through said entrance.
But, after about 50 years/half a century, someone decided that an otherwise unidentified PersonImage filmed from a moving hand-held camera, from a moving motorcade vehicle some cars behind the PresidentialLimousine, as seen in shadow, in a corner area, must be LeeHarveyOswald, without any confirmation evidence.
So, a History Changing Story was born, never mind contradictory provable evidence.
On the other hand, pictured is a great example of the value of DayLightSavingsTime.


« Last Edit: March 15, 2019, 04:57:27 AM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 445
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #1869 on: July 04, 2018, 08:12:06 AM »
No good reason why this can't be LHO.
No good reason to think it can be any other TSBD employee, and every good reason to think it can't!



The elimination of Sarah Stanton and the fine probative work of Stancak et al, have moved this into the territory of Beyond Reasonable Doubt IMO. The AnybodyButOswald crew are sounding more and more desperate. They're out of alternative candidates!  :'(

Bumped for image preservation to pursue detection of any PersonImage(s), beyond those filmed/pictured, being "inserted into the scene".
However, any  BS: assertions beyond fact need to  Walk:.

 

Mobile View