Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members and 38 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 210541 times)

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2560 on: February 11, 2019, 06:19:05 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quite a great new find. Hosty confirms that Oswald is Prayer Man. Doyle can rant and rave all he wants but it does not change the evidence one bit.

Fred
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Where is eyewitness testimony, including numerous employees at the TexasSchoolBookDepository Building that were on the landing, as well as on the stairs and on the sidewalk/street just in front of the TSBD Bldg entrance stairs/landing, that places accused LoneGunmanAssassin, LeeHarveyOswald(1939-1963), on said landing during the fatal shooting of USP JohnKennedySr (1917-1963) and critical wounding of TxG JohnConnallyJr(1917-1993)?

How could Bldg Superintendent RoyTruly(1907-1985), accompanied by DPD Officer MarrionBaker(1930-2011) have brushed by LeeOswald on the landing without seeing him, especially considering that SuperintendentTruly and OfficerBaker encountered MrOswald on the second floor, at the lunchroom about 60-90 seconds after the shots were fired?

Why claim that LeeOswald was on the landing during the assassination/shooting without any of multiple area occupants' testimony/sworn statements' confirming said presence?

Why claim
that DPD Officer MarrionBaker and Bldg Superintendent RoyTruly did not encounter LeeHarveyOswald at the SecondFloorLunchroom some 60-90 seconds after the shots being fired, despite their testimony/sworn statements' confirming said encounter?

Mr Clements, can you provide reliable provable evidence that FBI SA JamesHosty proves/confirms that LeeHarveyOswald is in fact the actual person represented by PrayerPersonImage?
« Last Edit: February 11, 2019, 06:20:46 PM by Larry Trotter »

Offline Larry Trotter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2561 on: February 11, 2019, 07:39:21 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: Prayer Man is Oswald.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? Not even Oswald said he went out front!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: There's lots of evidence pointing to the contrary.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? There's no evidence to the contrary!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: What about Harry Holmes's WC testimony, and...

LONE NUTTER: You call that evidence? Ha ha ha. Nothing to see here!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: What if we were to find hard evidence that Oswald said he went out front?

LONE NUTTER: So you admit you have no hard evidence! Ha ha ha. Try harder!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: Actually, we have just uncovered a note written by Agent James Hosty which states that Oswald said he went out front.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? Oswald was a liar!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: But the Hosty note proves that Captain Fritz and co. lied about what he said in custody.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? Oswald was a liar!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: But the Hosty note corroborates Carolyn Arnold and Sarah Stanton's sighting of Oswald in the lunchroom before the assassination.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? There's absolutely no photographic or film evidence of Oswald in the lunchroom before the assassination. Ha ha ha. Try harder!


I tend to wonder, as I do often wander, to whom this Reply is addressed. I tend to assume that "LONE NUTTER" is a reference to those that embrace the LeeHarveyOswald/LoneGunmanAssassinTheory. And, I tend to assume that "PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE" is a reference to those that embrace the LeeHarveyOswald/PrayerManTheory.

For clarification, I have yet to be able to embrace either theory.
However, I do believe that there is reliable indicative information as positive evidence that RoyTruly and MarrionBaker did encounter LeeOswald at the SecondFloorLunchRoom about 60-90 seconds after the shooting/fatal wounding of JohnKennedySr and shooting/critical wounding of JohnConnallyJr.
« Last Edit: February 15, 2019, 07:48:35 PM by Larry Trotter »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2561 on: February 11, 2019, 07:39:21 PM »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2562 on: February 11, 2019, 09:17:58 PM »
Friends, one cannot but be impressed at the fact that, when the Prayer Man theory was developed over 5 years ago, a bold double inference was made from the available evidence that Mr Oswald had claimed in custody
A) to have gone to the 2nd floor lunchroom for a coke before (not after) the motorcade
B) to have gone out front for the motorcade.

And now we get this stunning confirmation, in the clearest language possible, of that bold double inference:



Tsk tsk. A terrible, terrible week for the anti-Prayer Man zealots  :'(



Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2394
Prayer Woman
« Reply #2563 on: February 11, 2019, 09:40:33 PM »
Alan is not telling the truth...Hosty's notes are clearly in less precise language than Bookhout and Fritz who include more details than Hosty...Bookhout and Fritz include the details of Baker's lunch room encounter with Oswald as well as the mention of Shelley...Alan is not telling the truth and is describing the situation backwards which is typical of Kamp and his followers...And Alan ignores the incriminating reason why Hosty is less precise...

If Alan had more fidelity to credible analysis he would realize Hosty's omitting Baker from the lunchroom encounter is a sign of its real-ness because Hosty is trying to avoid committing himself to a definite time that places Oswald in the lunch room...Hosty knows if he mentions Baker and the timing of the lunch room encounter he'll lock himself in to a time that places Oswald too close to the lunch room at the time of the shots, so he avoids mentioning it...Counter to what Alan contends Hosty is much less clear and the reason so is highly incriminating and backs our evidence...

Once you realize Hosty is avoiding telling when Oswald went for that Coke then you realize he is trying not to make people aware that it was before the shots, as even Alan admits...The question then arises of when Oswald went up for that Coke and it becomes clear it was well before the shooting and that he was in the lunch room from 12:25 when Carolyn Arnold saw him to 12:31 when Baker & Truly confronted him...

Alan is trying to avoid the obvious that ALL accounts of Fritz's interview start at the lunch room encounter...Counter to what Alan assures us, Hosty is actually the least clear and Bookhout and Fritz both provide the detail of Baker and the timing of the lunch room encounter...

Once you acknowledge that the sequence seen in Hosty's notes has the lunch room encounter as its starting point then the "Went outside to watch the presidential parade" is definitely over 3 minutes after the period of the Darnell Prayer Man image and can't possibly be used as evidence for Oswald being outside at the time of the shots...

The Prayer Man people just ignore Hosty in his book where he details Oswald saying he was in the 1st floor lunch room during the shots...This is the worst sort of dishonest cherry-picking designed to make the evidence say what they want to hear no matter how badly they mangle context...

JFK Assassination Forum

Prayer Woman
« Reply #2563 on: February 11, 2019, 09:40:33 PM »

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1309
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2564 on: February 11, 2019, 09:42:32 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Friends, one cannot but be impressed at the fact that, when the Prayer Man theory was developed over 5 years ago, a bold double inference was made from the available evidence that Mr Oswald had claimed in custody
A) to have gone to the 2nd floor lunchroom for a coke before (not after) the motorcade
B) to have gone out front for the motorcade.

And now we get this stunning confirmation, in the clearest language possible, of that bold double inference:



Tsk tsk. A terrible, terrible week for the anti-Prayer Man zealots  :'(

Alan,

Prayer Man advocates discount the sworn testimonies of Marion Baker, Roy Truly and Jeraldean Reid. They have three or four others committing perjury as well. Methinks your use of "zealots" is misdirected. If you want to see a real zealot, look in the mirror.

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1309
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2565 on: February 11, 2019, 09:46:25 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quite a great new find. Hosty confirms that Oswald is Prayer Man.

How so? 

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2565 on: February 11, 2019, 09:46:25 PM »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2566 on: February 11, 2019, 09:47:58 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Alan,

Prayer Man advocates discount the sworn testimonies of Marion Baker, Roy Truly and Jeraldean Reid. They have three or four others committing perjury as well. Methinks your use of "zealots" is misdirected. If you want to see a real zealot, look in the mirror.

Hello Mr Nickerson!

Do you accept that Mr Oswald did in fact claim to have
A) visited the 2nd floor lunchroom before the motorcade
B) gone out front to watch the motorcade?

If not, how do you explain this from Agent Hosty?



 Thumb1:

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1309
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2567 on: February 11, 2019, 09:52:26 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Friends, one cannot but be impressed at the fact that, when the Prayer Man theory was developed over 5 years ago, a bold double inference was made from the available evidence that Mr Oswald had claimed in custody
A) to have gone to the 2nd floor lunchroom for a coke before (not after) the motorcade
B) to have gone out front for the motorcade.

And now we get this stunning confirmation, in the clearest language possible, of that bold double inference:



Tsk tsk. A terrible, terrible week for the anti-Prayer Man zealots  :'(

The highlighted text is not a confirmation of anything.  It's already well established (confirmed) that Oswald was a liar. Hosty was merely recording some of Oswald's lies.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2567 on: February 11, 2019, 09:52:26 PM »

Online Thomas Graves

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1021
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2568 on: February 11, 2019, 09:57:29 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The highlighted text is not a confirmation of anything.  It's already well established (confirmed) that Oswald was a liar. Hosty was merely recording some of Oswald's lies.

Tim,

Well put.

--Mudd Wrassler Tommy  :)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1283
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2569 on: February 11, 2019, 10:00:28 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
The highlighted text is not a confirmation of anything.  It's already well established (confirmed) that Oswald was a liar. Hosty was merely recording some of Oswald's lies.

Aha! 'Hosty was merely recording some of Oswald's lies'. So you accept that Agent Hosty's note accurately reflects what the evil Mr Oswald had been claiming. This means you now accept that the evil Mr Oswald did in fact claim to have been out front after all.

Good on you, Mr Nickerson-------you're making progress  Thumb1:

Now! Let's look at the evil Mr Oswald's 'lies', shall we?

1. I visited the 2nd floor lunchroom before the assassination.

Question! Were Carolyn Arnold and Sarah Stanton privy to the Hosty note that Bart Kamp has just uncovered?

2. I went out front to watch the motorcade.

Question! Why did Messrs Hosty, Bookhout, Fritz & co. suppress this 'lie' in their official reports and testimony?

Thanking you in advance for your reply, Mr Nickerson  Thumb1:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2569 on: February 11, 2019, 10:00:28 PM »

 

Mobile View