Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
Brian Doyle and 34 Guests are viewing this topic.

Author Topic: Prayer Woman  (Read 246164 times)

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2530 on: February 11, 2019, 05:00:26 AM »
As I've already stated, no self-respecting researcher will deny the bombshell importance of these words from James Hosty:

O[swald] stated he was present for work at TBD on the morning of 11/22 and at noon went to lunch. He went to 2nd floor to get Coca Cola to eat with lunch and returned to 1st floor to eat lunch. Then went outside to watch P[residential] Parade.


 Thumb1:



« Last Edit: February 11, 2019, 05:01:12 AM by Alan Ford »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2530 on: February 11, 2019, 05:00:26 AM »

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Prayer Woman
« Reply #2531 on: February 11, 2019, 05:08:56 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Friends! Anyone who has been following this issue without bias will understand the scale of the breakthrough that James Hosty's note represents. It proves beyond any question that the interrogation report filed under the sole name of James W. Bookhout was a despicable lie. This report deprived Mr Oswald of his alibi by distorting completely what he had been telling Captain Fritz in custody.

Actually if you go to the Bookhout, Fritz, and Hosty descriptions they are all noticeably similar...All three start at the lunch room encounter in the 2nd floor lunch room and mention a Coke...All three then describe Oswald saying he went downstairs to the 1st floor...And all three then have Oswald going outside...

The only reason Hosty is different than Bookhout and Fritz is because he is omitting the detail of the lunch room encounter because he knows it leads to knowledge of Oswald being in the lunch room during the shots...Hosty also omits mention of Shelley because he is avoiding drawing curiosity over his doings...Hosty is aware Shelley is an Intel insider who helped Oswald out the rear exit so he drops mention of him in order not to draw attention to him and his real doings...

Alan makes a false statement...Bookhout did not deny what Oswald told Fritz and if you look at Bookhout's report he identically repeats Oswald's claim that he went out front with Bill Shelley...It is Hosty who fails to mention this even though they are observing the same interview...

Sorry Alan but that is dishonestly oversimplified...You won't get away with it for the reasons I posted and you foolishly ignored...
« Last Edit: February 11, 2019, 05:10:25 AM by Brian Doyle »

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2532 on: February 11, 2019, 06:16:33 AM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Friends! Anyone who has been following this issue without bias will understand the scale of the breakthrough that James Hosty's note represents. It proves beyond any question that the interrogation report filed under the sole name of James W. Bookhout was a despicable lie. This report deprived Mr Oswald of his alibi by distorting completely what he had been telling Captain Fritz in custody.

Here's the first interrogation report to which Bookhout put his name. It's a joint report written with James Hosty:

Oswald stated that he went to lunch at approximately noon and claimed he ate his lunch on the first floor in the lunch room; however he went to the  second floor where the coca cola machine is located and obtained a bottle of coca cola for his lunch. Oswald claimed to be on the first floor when President John F. Kennedy passed the building.

Here's the Hosty note that has just come to light:

O[swald] stated he was present for work at TBD on the morning of 11/22 and at noon went to lunch. He went to 2nd floor to get Coca Cola to eat with lunch and returned to 1st floor to eat lunch. Then went outside to watch P[residential] Parade.

Now! The thing to note about both of the above is that they are saying the same thing. But with this teeny weeny difference: the Hosty note lays it all out plain and simple, whereas the joint Bookhout/Hosty report uses weasel words to create some ambiguity.

Now!! Just take a look at what happens to Mr Oswald's reported words in the subsequent Bookhout-alone report. It's quite something...

Oswald stated that on November 22, 1963, at the time of the search of the Texas School Book Depository building by Dallas police officers, he was on the second floor of said building, having just purchased a Coca-cola form the soft-drink machine, at which time a police officer came into the room with pistol drawn and asked him if he worked there. Mr. Truly was present and verified that he was an employee and the police officer thereafter left the room and continued through the building. Oswald stated that he took this Coke down to the first floor and stood around and had lunch in the employee?s lunch room. He thereafter went outside and stood around for five or ten minutes with foreman Bill Shelly.

This report was written to hide some simple facts, viz.--------------
1. Mr Oswald visited the second-floor lunchroom before the assassination (Ms Carolyn Arnold and Ms Sarah Stanton are 100% vindicated!)
2. Mr Oswald took his Coca Cola down to the first floor and went out front to watch the parade
3. There was no second-floor lunchroom encounter with Officer Baker and Mr Truly.

The mantra of the Anyone-But-LHO-As-Prayer-Person crowd-----------
Oh but that's crazy, Oswald himself never claimed to have gone out to see the President!
-----------can no longer be taken seriously by any self-respecting researcher.

Mr Oswald is Prayer Man.  Thumb1:

There has always been a great oddity contained in the original Hosty/Bookhout interrogation report:

"Oswald claimed to be on the first floor when President John F. Kennedy passed the building."

Sheesh, guys, maybe you could give us some idea of, like, where exactly on the first damn floor he's claiming to have been. Cos, ya know, he is the prime suspect in the assassination and all! Is a bit of detail too much to ask for?

The newly discovered (by Mr. Bart Kamp) handwritten note from James Hosty both gives us the detail we were looking for, and explains why there was no way in hell it was ever going to find its way into an official printed report:

"Then went outside to watch P[residential] Parade."

The game's well and truly up now. Only fools and knaves will continue to cling on to the discredited lunchroom encounter garbage and its attendant idiocies. And only fools and knaves will continue to deny the significance of the figure standing on the west side of the doorway in the Wiegman and Darnell films. It's none other than Mr Oswald.

The arc of the moral universe may be long, friends, but it really does bend toward justice.

This is an historic week in JFK assassination research. Thumb1:


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2532 on: February 11, 2019, 06:16:33 AM »

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Prayer Woman
« Reply #2533 on: February 11, 2019, 06:59:01 AM »
That isn't at all an accurate interpretation of the Hosty notes and Alan Ford is contemptuously ignoring the reasons why just like his mentor Kamp...

The Prayer Man people are fools because the scan will show Sarah Stanton as being the person these evidence fantasists are calling Oswald...Davidson already proved it but they ignored it...
« Last Edit: February 11, 2019, 07:05:57 AM by Brian Doyle »

Offline Frederick Clements

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2534 on: February 11, 2019, 02:08:03 PM »
Quite a great new find. Hosty confirms that Oswald is Prayer Man. Doyle can rant and rave all he wants but it does not change the evidence one bit.

Fred

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2534 on: February 11, 2019, 02:08:03 PM »

Offline Mark A. Oblazney

  • Full Member
  • ***

  • This Member Has Made
    A Forum Donation!
  • Posts: 148
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2535 on: February 11, 2019, 03:15:27 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quite a great new find. Hosty confirms that Oswald is Prayer Man. Doyle can rant and rave all he wants but it does not change the evidence one bit.

Fred

If only...... then, history would have to be re-written.  Got hope?  Nope.  The evidence describes otherwise, but that's just me, see.  It DEFINITELY was some dude taking pictures with a camera.  But what do I know?  I just see a man holding up a (camera?).  I'm sure the original film will conclude it was NOT Sarah, as Mr. Doyle postulates.  But again...... this is all..... Pareidoylia (should we copyright that word?).  This is just an opinion, not a twelve-paragraph analysis.  So there.

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2536 on: February 11, 2019, 03:51:56 PM »
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login
Quite a great new find. Hosty confirms that Oswald is Prayer Man. Doyle can rant and rave all he wants but it does not change the evidence one bit.

Fred

Quite right, Mr Clements! The pathetic bloviations of the usual suspects should not distract us from the magnitude of this discovery.

1. We now know with 100% certainty that Mr Oswald told Captain Fritz he went out front for the motorcade.
2. We also therefore know with 100% certainty that Fritz, Bookhout, Hosty, Kelley and friends suppressed this explosive claim in their official reports and testimony.
3. We also know with 100% certainty that Mr Oswald told Captain Fritz he visited the 2nd-floor lunchroom before the assassination.
4. We also therefore know with 100% certainty that this claim, along with Ms Carolyn Arnold's corroboration of it, was suppressed.

Bottom line:
--------------Mr Oswald told the truth about his movements around the time of the assassination.
--------------Accordingly, Captain Fritz and friends lied.

As has been recognised for several years now by those with eyes to see, the only person who didn't completely suppress the alibi which Mr Oswald supplied to his interrogators was Postal Inspector, Mr Harry D. Holmes.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2536 on: February 11, 2019, 03:51:56 PM »

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Prayer Woman
« Reply #2537 on: February 11, 2019, 04:17:25 PM »
Obviously some people are bullet heads and there is no point posting because no matter how much evidence you post they ignore it and stick to their own uncredible thoughts...It is highly damaging to the CT side to have a large percentage of members who have no analysis skills and simply grab on to a theory because it sounds good...These people like the idea of Oswald being out front so they stick to it and ignore all evidence that shows otherwise...

A few years ago Chris Davidson enhanced the steady frame from the Wiegman film with modern digital photo tech...He got challenged on his metadata by persons who thought he would not be able to produce it...When he produced it and posted it at the Education Forum and proved he did nothing to alter the film and only used simple brightness and contrast adjustments to bring out what the human eye could not see the opposition did not honestly acknowledge it...3 years ago Chris Davidson proved Prayer Man was a woman...The Prayer Man people are pretending that didn't happen but they are fools because they are only digging their own graves as far as credibility once we get the 6th Floor Museum copy that will only prove it more...The Prayer Man people ignore conclusive proof and keep trying to make Prayer Man Oswald no matter what they are shown...Because they are led by Bart Kamp they delude themselves that the Hosty notes are somehow going to make this go away and not apply to them...Their websites ban anyone who dares mention this factual history...

The posters on the Education Forum exist under the deliberate delusion that Debra Conway did not show Buell Frazier my arguments and Buell Frazier did not agree with her that Prayer Man was Sarah Stanton...That is a mentally unhealthy non-reality that the Prayer Man people deliberately conduct in order to only hear what they want to hear and ignore everything else - including Frazier himself...

JFK Assassination Forum

Prayer Woman
« Reply #2537 on: February 11, 2019, 04:17:25 PM »

Online Brian Doyle

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Prayer Woman
« Reply #2538 on: February 11, 2019, 04:18:29 PM »
Alan Ford will not answer why, if Hosty is the better source, does he not mention Shelley like Bookhout and Fritz do?

Offline Alan Ford

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2539 on: February 11, 2019, 04:26:26 PM »
PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: Prayer Man is Oswald.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? Not even Oswald said he went out front!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: There's lots of evidence pointing to the contrary.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? There's no evidence to the contrary!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: What about Harry Holmes's WC testimony, and...

LONE NUTTER: You call that evidence? Ha ha ha. Nothing to see here!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: What if we were to find hard evidence that Oswald said he went out front?

LONE NUTTER: So you admit you have no hard evidence! Ha ha ha. Try harder!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: Actually, we have just uncovered a note written by Agent James Hosty which states that Oswald said he went out front.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? Oswald was a liar!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: But the Hosty note proves that Captain Fritz and co. lied about what he said in custody.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? Oswald was a liar!

PRAYER-MAN-IS-OSWALD ADVOCATE: But the Hosty note corroborates Carolyn Arnold and Sarah Stanton's sighting of Oswald in the lunchroom before the assassination.

LONE NUTTER: Are you nuts? There's absolutely no photographic or film evidence of Oswald in the lunchroom before the assassination. Ha ha ha. Try harder!

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Prayer Woman
« Reply #2539 on: February 11, 2019, 04:26:26 PM »

 

Mobile View