I had a little debate with Barker on my Prayer Woman page... He made the argument that Fritz did not take notes so therefore Hosty's notes were the superior reference...When I pointed-out that Fritz was the one doing the interview and therefore remembered what he asked Oswald and what Oswald answered with Greg didn't respond...His website is a black hole of bogus research where hacks and crazies are cherry-picking anything they can desperately stretch to mean what they wish while banning anyone who shows the refuting evidence...So Barker was saying we should go by the Hosty notes exclusively "because they trump the reports due to their being taken on the spot" ...When I pointed out to him that the Hosty notes failed to mention Oswald going out front with Shelley Greg didn't answer...Greg's group are liars who only cite what they want to hear and ignore that which refutes it...Since we are now being pointed to Hosty by Greg then we should honor his quoting Oswald saying he went to the bus...These Prayer Man idiots also ignore that their preferred and approved source Hosty tells of Oswald having a Coke...Something the great Jim D denied and went after as false but now that it is repeatedly appearing in evidence Jim sneaks off and stays quiet pretending he isn't hearing it...
What Greg's group is ignoring and trying to troll around is Hosty's notes match Fritz's notes perfectly when overlain on each other...Therefore the chronology established in the more accurate Fritz notes must be honored...Fritz's last line told of Oswald going "Out with Shelley in front"...Hosty's last line told of Oswald going "outside to watch the presidential parade"...The honest chronology of both is AFTER Baker confronted Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room...Larry Grayson doppleganger Bart " Ooooh...Shut That Door" Kamp, in his typical boyish deception ignores this obvious context and desperately tries to force this one line over all other intelligent analysis despite his obviously ripping it out of context... And he has schoolyard booby Jim DiEugenio in his knickers, neck-tie, and schoolboy hat giving it his stamp of approval while ignoring how egregiously dishonest it all is...
A more insightful intelligent analysis will see that Hosty omits the part of Fritz's interview where Oswald tells him that Baker confronted him in the 2nd floor lunch room...Hosty does that because he is FBI and is closer to the federal source of the cover-up...Hosty drops the inconvenient detail of Baker because he knows Oswald was in the 2nd floor lunch room during the shots and doesn't want to mention it...Hosty also drops Fritz's mention of Shelley...Oswald slipped there and gave a detail that led to how he got out the rear exit of the Depository...Shelley helped him out the back...Hosty is aware of this and once again drops what is incriminating from his interview...Greg ignorantly doesn't realize that Hosty very much is the better source, but not for the reasons he believes...
What Barker and his band of mis-directionists fail to realize is their own Hosty evidence tells of an Oswald who said he went up to get a Coke and came back to the Domino Room to eat lunch when he then heard the shots...But that doesn't make sense because the correct evidence has Oswald in the 2nd floor lunch room when Baker & Truly came in as more accurately described in Fritz's notes...You can't use Hosty's notes for this because he's dropping the location part for deceptive reasons...If we go by the accurate testimony it doesn't make sense that Oswald went from the Domino Room to the 2nd floor lunch room to get a Coke and then back down to the Domino Room and then back up to the 2nd floor lunch room...It doesn't make sense because it requires Oswald to be buying two Cokes within minutes...If we go by the accurate testimony that is what Barker's scenario actually requires...They know this so they solve it by trying to get rid of the 2nd floor lunch room encounter because they realize it destroys their nutty Prayer Man theory...
I've never gotten an honest answer from the Prayer Man people over the words of the more honest reporter Fritz...Ball tried to bait Fritz into saying Oswald went up to get a Coke in the 2nd floor lunch room...Fritz wouldn't bite because he knew Oswald didn't tell him that:
Mr. BALL. Did he tell you he was up there to get a Coca-Cola?
Mr. FRITZ. He said he had a Coca-Cola.
What Fritz is indirectly saying there is Oswald never told him he went up to get a Coke...He told him he was in the 2nd floor lunch room...Hosty omits the part about Baker confronting Oswald there because he doesn't want to tip people off to where Oswald was...
I think I agree with this logic, which is why I am more convinced that Oswald was in the 2nd floor lunchroom from 12:15 until he heard sirens frequency and left the 2nd floor lunchroom in only his T-shirt, having just bought a coke, to go to the immediate 2nd floor office, to enquire from someone what was the cause of the sirens. He left approx. 30 to 40 sec post shots, and walked into the 2nd floor office, looking for someone, but no one was there. Ms Geneva Hines had left and probably had made a stop into the womens bathroom since this about the only way to have seen people "falling" which were like the Newmans on the GK, which is NOT a perspective possible from the so called west side window that Geneva Hines claims to have seen this happen.
Now if I can prove the Couch film is a composite film of Couch film sequence which actually begins at approx. 5 to 6 sec post shots, otherwise, how is Couch able to have recorded Wiegman in the background on the Grassy Knoll, "TURNING AROUND" which = Weigman has just STOPPED his camera, and you can see this "cut" from the scene of the 2 persons at the Pergola wall, which is 15 sec from when Wiegman jumps from his car. And since Wiegman didn't hear 3rd shot until AFTER he jumped from car, and was running, subtracting 2 sec for that, means Wiegmans continuous running film finally is "CUT" at approximately 13 sec post LAST shot fired.
This means for the Couch film to have caught Weigman turning which at 8 seconds into Couch film is actually at the 13 sec post shots. Which means Couch film HAD to be started at 5 to 6 second post shots to have caught Wiegman at 13 sec post shots.
Also, Couch WC testimony is the their car was about 60 ft from making the turn on Elm st, when the shots were fired, and if the motorcade speed was approx. 15mph average, and since 1mph= approx. 1.5 ft./sec, would mean that the Couch car reached the turn at 3 sec post shots. And Couch also managed catch a glimpse of the rifle being withdrawn, which is like 2 sec post last shot.
Couch then immediately reached for his camera, made a "quick setting" and put camera to his eye and started his sequence of filming that supposedly includes Baker running thru and past Mrs Reid and other office women still supposedly standing there, 25 sec post shots, even thought Mrs Reids own WC testimony contradicts that probability.
Or Baker has to have been filmed by some other camera that began at 25 sec post shots, and at the point in that film many of the office women are NOT in the position and Mrs Reid may have already left.
If those 2 films are merged somehow, overlapped, the composite film has Baker moving thru, like a ghost, right past Mrs Reid.
Why did neither Mrs Reid, NOR Malcolm Couch have an WC testimony of having seen a DPD officer RUNNING right past them?
Malcolm Couch only describes the DPD officer he filmed AFTER he cut his film just after capturing Wiegman on the GK, and this officer has his gun drawn and very clearly captured, JUST AS COUCH describes. So its NOT Baker, that Couch is refering to, when stating have gotten a close up of an DPD officer with gun drawn.
JFK Assassination Forum
